guys ?

Channel
CRYPTO PRIME 💰
@Cryptoprime06
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,571subscribers
-93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001143702879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptoprime06 |
| Created | 4 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptoprime06 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 6,571 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 6,582 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 6,591 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 6,597 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 6,604 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 6,620 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 6,630 | -18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 6,648 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 6,654 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 6,660 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 6,664 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 6,664 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.04%
- avg views ÷ 6,571 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 200
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (4 July 2025 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Iran's currency has collapsed and is now officially worth $0. Iran needs Bitcoin .
Bitcoin in green mode yesterday now red mode today! Either way we stay together 👑🚀
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 OVER $100 BILLION WIPED OUT FROM CRYPTO MARKET IN LAST 24 HOURS. WELCOME TO BULL MARKET VOLATILITY
UPDATE: The probability of a U.S. Federal Reserve rate cut in September has risen to 99.8%
I just don't know the fking username of my tg... Fuck.. 😁 @primechief06 . Lemme know in dms
You guys wanna learn or I simply start sharing only setups and signals.. leme know in dms of marcus (my colleague just want to fking rename everything ) @Cryptoprime06
What if I told you every price action, in every market is controlled by an algo.. would u believe. U better do because it's the truth. The big Algo .. bank knows.. BlackRock knows.. every billionaire knows. Retail.. hahaha
When I was off , I did pretty much home work for the new techniques ... Slowly slowly learn and let it sink in.
Whole day 24hr... Quarter 6h Quarter of 6h ..is 90 m So qqq'q remaining for the D, W close.. And if it closes like this ... Then read a bit of OHLC (open high low close) cause that gonna happen this upcoming week. Pure alpha as per qt (quarterly theory).
#bitcoin : Breakdown.... Whatever goes up ... Goes down too. Master any direction ... Simple. Real game start after 115.7k cause of altcoin play. Or else one more wave up (most probably) then DOWN.
SSMT: the laser-precise beacon for market tops and bottoms. With accuracy of 95%.
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Cryptoprime06. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 28,527
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO PRIME 💰” (@Cryptoprime06), 6,571 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptoprime06.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.