Are you holding 1coin? Dipped to 17k and now 34k within 24hrs Ca 0xe43eF1fE041Ba9E8da87E8C5bFD583B3b46A1111
❤3

Channel
@Cryptoscouters1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
909subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001903289018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptoscouters1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptoscouters1 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 909 | -12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 921 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:05 | 925 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 936 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 946 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 961 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 960 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 960 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 27.8% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Are you holding 1coin? Dipped to 17k and now 34k within 24hrs Ca 0xe43eF1fE041Ba9E8da87E8C5bFD583B3b46A1111
❤3
*IF YOU WANT TO BE MAKING MONEY WITH AI TRADING EVERYDAY SIGN UP WITH THIS LINK* COMPLETELY FREE, NO INVESTMENT NEEDED. YOU WILL BE GIVEN 24 DOLLARS BONUS AND THE AI WILL BE TRADIG AND DROPPING PROFIT FOR YOU EVERYDAY WITH THE 24 DOLLARS. IT IS AUTOMATIC, HANDSFREE. NO PREVIOUS KNOWLEDGE OR DAILY COMMITMENT NEEDED. SEE EVIDENCE OF WITHDRAWAL ABOVE. THAT ACCOUNT UP THERE MAKES 3 DOLLARS PLUS DAILY. *FOR FREE* @a…
❤1
August is a busy month so be ready to cashout well
Happy new month guys I went on holidays to get some tools ready
I've been thinking about a pattern that keeps repeating in crypto. The biggest fortunes rarely come from buying established ecosystems. They come from showing up before everyone else believes. Over the years, I've watched new blockchains launch. In almost every cycle, the first wave of quality tokens produced some of the most explosive returns. Not because every project succeeded—but because being early in the rig…
🤝✨ If you want to be trusted, be honest. Trust is built through truth, consistency, and integrity. People may forget what you said, but they will always remember whether they could rely on your words and actions. Honesty creates strong relationships, earns respect, and gives you peace of mind. 🌿💯❤️ 🌟 Be truthful even when it's difficult, because trust takes years to build but only moments to break. Let honesty be th…
They lied to us 😆 🤣 Happy friday to all of us.
😁1
Dear meme traders, I'm writing to share five reasons why you should start using BaseBot for your trades today. 1. It's 10x faster than most trading bots. 2. It detects honeypots and scam tokens instantly when you paste the contract address (CA). 3. It makes bridging assets across multiple chains quick and easy. 4. You can set alerts to monitor price movements, developer sells, and market cap changes, whether the…
Good morning hunters 🍵
Robinhood Chain needs more than tokens—it needs an ecosystem. An ecosystem where builders can launch, creators can educate, communities can grow, and investors can discover opportunities early. Our mission is to become the growth hub of Robinhood Chain through 8 powerful utilities, including a launchpad, media network, community growth engine, educational content, X Spaces, YouTube coverage, builder support, and st…
👍4
A friend from the United States is launching an ecosystem on robinhood soon. He has contacted me for partnership and am already building community on whatsapp. Make sure you are recognised in the ecosystem for future benefits.
🔥2👍1
Like, retweet and comment guys https://x.com/i/status/2079501623236182366
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cryptoscouters1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALPHA HUNTERS HQ” (@Cryptoscouters1), 909 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptoscouters1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.