Channel
@Cryptothreadsno1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
164subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002303976285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptothreadsno1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptothreadsno1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 164 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 164 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 164 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
⚠️OVER 500 MILLION SAND MINTED IN SUSPECTED SECURITY BREACH AT THE SANDBOX On the Base network, a serious vulnerability is putting The Sandbox - the metaverse project backed by Animoca Brands, which raised $93 million in a 2021 funding round - at risk of losing control over its token supply. An attacker reportedly gained minting permissions and has been able to mint $SAND arbitrarily, creating over 500 million tok…
🔥 ZCASH ETF TOOK A BIG STEP FORWARD - SEC RECEIVES 5TH AMENDMENT Grayscale renamed the fund "The Zcash ETF," set to list on NYSE Arca under ticker ZCH with a 2.5% annual fee, aiming to become the first US ETF to directly track ZEC – which is up nearly 10% in the past 24 hours. 🔗 https://x.com/CryptoThreadsX/status/2091046236535333280 Website | X | Facebook | IG | Telegram | LinkedIn | Youtube | Medium
A FORMER WHITE HOUSE ECONOMIC ADVISER JUST CALLED BESSENT'S PLAN "A FOOL'S GAME." Just one day after the U.S. Treasury pumped $4B into a bond buyback - the same move that helped Bitcoin surge to 70K - the entire yield drop got wiped out. The 30-year yield snapped back to 5.27%, while national debt just crossed $40 trillion. Bessent says he's ready to buy back even more. But can he really outrun the deficit and infl…
Cryptothreads.io pinned a photo
Cryptothreads.io × Fintoq - GIVEAWAY IS LIVE!🔥 💰 50 $USDT 🏆 5 winners → Follow @CryptoThreadsX @fintoq_ai → Like + Repost → Drop your wallet (TRC20) on this post https://x.com/CryptoThreadsX/status/2090743655904797011 ⏰ 3 DAYS Good luck! 🍀 Note: Prize distribution will be handled directly by Fintoq. Cryptothreads.io acts solely as the event host. DYOR. Website | X | Facebook | IG | Telegram | LinkedIn | Youtub…
🇺🇸 WHITE HOUSE CRYPTO MEETING: EVERY MAJOR POLICY POINT COVERED Trump just held a closed-door meeting with the CEOs of Coinbase, Ripple, Kraken, Chainlink, Robinhood, plus NYSE and NASDAQ - but two of the biggest prediction market platforms got cut from the room at the last minute over a betting scandal tied to Trump's own speeches. 👀 And that's just the opening. In the same week: - The SEC quietly proposed a new f…
🚨 MANTRA CRASHES 18%, ENTIRE BLOCKCHAIN FROZEN AFTER EXPLOIT - WHAT'S GOING ON? Overnight (UTC), MANTRA's OM token plunged from $0.0050 to a record low of $0.0041 in just minutes, with trading volume surging nearly 600%. Shortly after, the MANTRA network officially halted block production - all transactions, deposits, withdrawals, and endpoints were frozen. The cause? MANTRA's team confirmed an attacker exploited a…
🚨 $6 BILLION WIPED OUT IN 3 DAYS - SHORT SELLERS GET CRUSHED BTC is closing in on $76,000, and behind this rally is a nightmare for traders who bet on the downside. - 3 straight days, nearly $6B in short positions liquidated - Fear & Greed Index jumped from 46 → 62, hitting "Greed" for the first time in 10 months - One trader with a 23-win streak and $49M in profits just got wrecked for almost $24M on a single posi…
🚨 JUSTIN SUN WON A ROUND IN HIS LEGAL BATTLE AGAINST THE TRUMP FAMILY'S CRYPTO EMPIRE A court just rejected World Liberty Financial's request to seal the case, allowing Sun's multi-hundred-million-dollar lawsuit - in which he accuses WLF of installing a "backdoor" to freeze his own $WLFI tokens - to proceed publicly. 🔗 https://x.com/CryptoThreadsX/status/2090623258186109287 Website | X | Facebook | IG | Telegram…
🔥 BTC BREAKS THE $73,000 MARK AND THE MARKET JUST WITNESSED ONE OF THE BIGGEST "MASSACRES" IN HISTORY - $3.3 BILLION wiped out in liquidations within 24 hours. - 189,000+ traders got liquidated. - 92% of them were SHORT positions. This also marks the largest short squeeze ever recorded. 🔗 https://x.com/CryptoThreadsX/status/2090601548820979885 Website | X | Facebook | IG | Telegram | LinkedIn | Youtube | Medium
🚨 OVER 150 POLYMARKET WALLETS SUSPECTED OF CASHING IN ON LEAKED MILITARY SECRETS Reuters reports that research group ACDC found 152 wallets on Polymarket placing eerily accurate bets on military markets right before sensitive events, raking in $8 million and raising fresh concerns about insider trading on classified information. 🔗 https://x.com/CryptoThreadsX/status/2090433383893742006 Website | X | Facebook | IG…
🚨 THE ONCE-RICHEST TYCOON IN ASIA GOT A LIFE SENTENCE Hui Ka Yan - founder of Evergrande - was sentenced to life in prison by a Shenzhen court and had all his assets confiscated, while the group was fined $2.3 billion for large-scale financial fraud, closing a tragic chapter for an empire that once carried $300 billion in debt and shook China's economy. 🔗 https://x.com/CryptoThreadsX/status/2090429957621404078 We…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cryptothreadsno1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Cryptothreadsno1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptothreads.io” (@Cryptothreadsno1), 164 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptothreadsno1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.