Early Projects Radar: 9 Fresh Names This Week This week's theme: markets for things that never had one. People, internet trends, pre-IPO shares, private credit before maturity, even trading card packs. 9 early-stage projects with real products, from perps on city rents to a market where you back a person before they make it.

Channel
Cryptoz Trade
@Cryptoz_trade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
148,355subscribers
-5,398 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001551741394 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptoz_trade |
| Description | @MouseHomies |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptoz_trade |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 148,355 | -356 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 148,711 | -276 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 148,987 | -320 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 149,307 | -345 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 149,652 | -347 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 149,999 | -559 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 150,558 | -271 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 150,829 | -220 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:12 | 151,049 | -173 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:05 | 151,222 | -134 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 151,356 | -151 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 151,507 | -115 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 151,622 | -148 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 151,770 | -94 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 151,864 | -109 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 151,973 | -124 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 152,097 | -181 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 152,278 | -154 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 152,432 | -107 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 152,539 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.136%
- avg views ÷ 148,355 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 203
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (7 April 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 405 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 21:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 575
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 245
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Guys, I see all your messages and requests for a new signal ⚡️ But please understand: signals like these are very rare Finding so many recently has been more a matter of luck, so we can’t expect this to keep happening all the time My team and I are working 24/7 to find a new signal, and we’ll share it here as soon as we find one Thanks to every one of you for being so active and supportive 🙏 📌 Pin our channel and…
What "moved" in the last 24 hours Bybit USDT Perpetual 🔥 92.6% ARIAUSDT 31.8% CYSUSDT 27.2% AKEUSDT Binance USDⓈ-M 🔥 46.3% FUNUSDT 38.4% LPTUSDT 26.6% DASHUSDT OKX USDT-M USDC-M 🔥 122.9% RAVE-USDT-SWAP 58.2% SOON-USDT-SWAP 46.4% UP-USDT-SWAP Subscribe to the Community here. CScalp | WebCScalp | Trader’s Diary @cryptoz_trade
What "moved" in the last 24 hours Bybit USDT Perpetual 🔥 270.3% RAVEUSDT 2688.7% ARIAUSDT 164.4% PARTIUSDT Binance USDⓈ-M 🔥 25.3% ZECUSDT 24.5% DASHUSDT 18.7% ENJUSDT OKX USDT-M USDC-M 🔥 267.9% RAVE-USDT-SWAP 165.9% PARTI-USDT-SWAP 85.9% OFC-USDT-SWAP Subscribe to the Community here. CScalp | WebCScalp | Trader’s Diary @cryptoz_trade
1m TF. The TRU asset is currently in an active decline. History shows bearish candles with large wicks, indicating aggressive selling. Buyers’ stop orders are expected to be just beyond the support levels. This may allow the downward move to continue. Considering these factors, an impulsive breakout is possible if the asset remains near the support levels and selling volume increases. Targets for closing: 0.007050…
1h TF. SIREN is showing growth, forming accumulation before a series of new highs. Market volumes are above average, indicating buying activity. This suggests buyers want to push the price up to break past previous highs. Local lows are rising, and the price approached the 0.76150 level. I plan to enter a trade when I see increased activity near this level, which could trigger a stop-loss hunt among sellers. @crypt…
1h TF. ### Local Growth as a Signal for a Decline The price is currently around the 71k mark. The current upward movement doesn’t look reliable. Therefore, I’m considering taking a short position. #### Technical Picture: I expect one more local maximum. The price may reach the FTA zone (71,900 – 72,800) for manipulation and liquidity gathering. In this zone, I’ll be paying close attention to sellers’ reactions to …
5m TF. The SIRENUSDT instrument continues to show a local uptrend. Currently, large volumes are coming in. Trading is happening right under the key horizontal resistance level. We expect stop losses of participants who opened short positions to be triggered. The ideal scenario is the formation of consolidation before the breakout. This will create conditions for a strong price movement, driven by mass stop-loss acti…
What "moved" in the last 24 hours Bybit USDT Perpetual 🔥 102.5% ENJUSDT 76.6% HIPPOUSDT 72.6% 4USDT Binance USDⓈ-M 🔥 94.5% ENJUSDT 13.8% ALGOUSDT 11.8% XMRUSDT OKX USDT-M USDC-M 🔥 98.4% ENJ-USDT-SWAP 43.6% FARTCOIN-USDT-SWAP 33% LAB-USDT-SWAP Subscribe to the Community here. CScalp | WebCScalp | Trader’s Diary @cryptoz_trade
30m TF. The instrument has formed a cascade of resistance levels. Behind each level, short stop orders from participants can be expected. Active consolidation of new lows and increasing volume indicate buyer interest. Before entering a trade, wait for consolidation and increased activity in the order book before the breakout of levels. 1st target level — 3.096 2nd target level — 3.116 3rd target level — 3.128 Fre…
30m TF. The active ENA has two resistance levels. They formed after several attempts and have accumulated liquidity. Trading volumes are increasing. Price lows are compressing towards the levels, forming a triangle. This indicates local buyer dominance. Before entering a trade, I wait for accumulation near the resistance levels. I also expect buyer activity in the order book before the breakout. Targets with partia…
30m TF. Right now, EDGE has pulled back into a local correction after liquidity was taken out. It’s returning to a key support area around 1.00, where an ascending trendline also runs. Despite the pullback from the highs zone, the structure remains bullish. The asset is holding in an upward move, and the current dip looks like a buildup before a rise. Price has come back into the buyers’ interest zone and is close …
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Cryptoz_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptoz Trade” (@Cryptoz_trade), 148,355 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptoz_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.