Selling Erebor 8 b valuation 10/0/0 Have big ticket

Channel
🕴️ Cybertim Ventures 🕴️
@Cybertim_OTC
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,948subscribers
-71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001515272930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cybertim_OTC |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cybertim_OTC |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 3,948 | -11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 3,959 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 3,969 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 3,975 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 3,979 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 3,989 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 3,994 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 3,997 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 4,007 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 4,011 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 4,017 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 4,019 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 4,019 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 53.8% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🕴️ Cybertim Ventures 🕴️ pinned «📚 CYBERTIM VENTURES — CONTENT LIBRARY Navigate by hashtag ↓ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ #Education — VC Fundamentals ├─ Valuation Methods ├─ Term Sheets ├─ Cap Tables ├─ SAFE vs Priced └─ Due Diligence #Deal — Live Opportunities ├─ Pre-IPO Allocations ├─ Secondary…»
📚 CYBERTIM VENTURES — CONTENT LIBRARY Navigate by hashtag ↓ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ #Education — VC Fundamentals ├─ Valuation Methods ├─ Term Sheets ├─ Cap Tables ├─ SAFE vs Priced └─ Due Diligence #Deal — Live Opportunities ├─ Pre-IPO Allocations ├─ Secondary Blocks ├─ Direct Cap Table └─ LP Swaps #News — Market Intel ├─ Funding Rounds ├─ IPO Pipeline ├─ M&A Activity └─ Regulatory #Insights — Analysis ├─ Sector Deep D…
Signed kimi
We are investing into *Moonshot AI (Kimi)’s Series G primary* round ($50B) with our own direct cap table SPV This would be our 3rd time investing. Write to invite you to join us as a co-investor &/or partner. *Details* • Valuation: *USD50B* • Share Type: *Primary shares* • Structure: *Cap Table SPV* - Moonshot I • Total Allocation: *USD500M* • Requirements: Minimum *USD10M*; LoI, PoF & investor profi…
BUY SIDE Fuse Energy 20M Fireworks 50M no carry L1 Generalist AI 10M CommonWealth Fusion 5M Ayar Labs 1-15M no carry Cognition 1M, 5M Applied Intuition 1-3M Helion 5M Substrate 1.5 M Core Automation 5M
These are the direct buyers and sellers I'm currently working with. Let me know if anything looks like a fit. BUY SIDE Boring – $20–30M Neuralink – $50M Anduril – $50M ElevenLabs – $25M ElevenLabs – $20M ElevenLabs – $10M ElevenLabs – $2–3M Base Power – $5M Base Power – $200–300K Rapyd – $20M Anthropic – $50M Anthropic – $10M Anthropic – $1–3M Revolut – $100M Revolut – $10M ClickHouse – $10–20M Figure AI – $5M Iso…
Bytedance 560 bn +5% Us ubos ok 0/0 structure
We have a clean $100 million Cursor position for sale at a $52.5 billion valuation via direct transfer. As you know, SpaceX holds a call option to acquire Cursor for $60 billion later in 2026. Recent reports (mid-to-late May 2026) state SpaceX plans to proceed with the acquisition ~30 days after its IPO, targeting a July 2026 close if the IPO occurs around June 12 Direct transfer of shares 2.5% total fees
Bids (Demand) ElevenLabs: $2m. $12bn valuation. --- Anthropic: $30m. Seeking best offers. Single layer SPV 0/0 --- Waymo: $5m. Single layer SPV 0/0. Seeking best offers --- Crusoe: $2m. Seeking best offers. --- anthropic --- Cartesia ai --- Cursoe ai --- Waymo --- Whoop --- Lightmatter --- Prometheus --- Skild AI — $6M @ $14B (highest priority) --- Physical Intelligence — primary $5–10M --- …
Gunzilla nodes WTS 70+ rares 30+ epics 4+ legendary DM @CEO_Cybertim
Bids (Demand) Databricks: $2m. $210/share. Single layer SPV 0/0 ElevenLabs: $2m. $12bn valuation. Anthropic: $30m. $350bn+10%. Single layer SPV 0/0 Kalshi: $10m. $14bn valuation. Single layer SPV 0/0 Helsing: Up to $20m. Seeking best offers Applied Intuition: $20m. Seeking best offers Asks (Offers) ShieldAI: $5m. $165/share. Single layer SPV 0/0 TogetherAI: $7m available. $195/share. Direct on cap table …
Dealflow Supply *SpaceX* (KYC by Tuesday) 83M | 1.25T | 8.5/0/0 | L1 *Prometheus* (Keystone is GP) TBA *Shieldai* (Direct to GP) 90M | $153.7 pps | 3.5/0.5/0 | L1 *MoonshotAi* (Direct to GP) 18M | $18Bn | 3/1/10 | L1 *Polymarket* (Direct to GP) 100M | $151.7 pps | 1/0/5 | L1 *ByteDance* (Direct to seller mandate, POF needs to be from HK) 400M | $550Bn | 5/0/0 | DTC/L1 *Neuralink* (Direct to GP) 50M | $38Bn | …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cybertim_OTC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Cybertim_OTC named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@na_morozhenoe · 1,695,344
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 31 August 2026
@YanucovihInCrypto · 39,829
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🕴️ Cybertim Ventures 🕴️” (@Cybertim_OTC), 3,948 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cybertim_OTC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.