Channel
@CzNnk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003848271182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CzNnk |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 20 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CzNnk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 32 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 31 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 29 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 28 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 28 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368436393871700187 | 7 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5368420596981988451 | 6 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5368576676093523690 | 6 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5249009601231224691 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5253704563126452166 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5368406578208731567 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5368456971060015720 | 3 | 9.68% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И так... На один год ближе к пенсии 🤩С днем рождения меня!! Спасибо родные, что поздравили. Пока день идёт на перекосяк. Однако я верю, что всё наладится.
custom 53684065782087315672custom 53685766760935236902custom 52490096012312246911
В общем, сейчас у меня нет косплеев с собой. Они в Питере пока (спасибо, дорогая грузоперевозка) . Соответственно, я черпаю идеи с идентити. Может вкину целый лист с коспланами. Ибо тот, что в закрепе уже не актуален
custom 53684363938717001872
Я сделаю вот так вот, якобы случайно
🎉 До вашего дня рождения осталось 3 дня!
А чтовы хотите тут увидеть? Грустный пост? не, не судьба. В августе того года я приехала в мск и под август этого свалила с него. Хочу сказать, что сутки в двухэтажном поезде (причем купе) оказались не хуже консервной банки : пьяные мужики, вонь, противные попутчики, отсутствие еды и пространства. Пока я ехала, думала какой блэкаут Вам сделать, в итоге не надумала. Все, кого я достала своим присутствием извиняйте…
custom 53684363938717001872
Вы здесь, а меня уже нет
custom 53685766760935236901
Я не буду пока выкладывать фото Давайте поговорим о насущном... Где искать посредника для тао бао 😨
Сегодня конкурсные списки
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53684205969819884512custom 53684363938717001871
Мы не выдвинулись, Шерлок.
custom 53684205969819884511
Анонс 🪨🪨🪨Рᴇбяᴛ, ну ʙозᴩᴀᴄᴛу нужно 🪨🪨🪨 ᴄооᴛʙᴇᴛᴄᴛʙоʙᴀᴛь.... По϶ᴛоʍу я буду 26.07 нᴀ ᴋиᴋо ʙ ᴋоᴄᴨᴧᴇᴇ ʙᴇᴧиᴋоᴦо дᴇдᴀ! Буду рада провести этот день в компании прелестной Тарталетки🥺
custom 53684569710600157203custom 52537045631264521662custom 53684205969819884512custom 53684363938717001872custom 52490096012312246911custom 53684065782087315671
Чтож.. Прошёл день с кошачьей вечеринки(вечера встреч и семьи). Отдельная благодарность Реки за столь прекрасный парик. Лично мне, данное мероприятие вызвало чувство отторжения. Благо я находилась со своими друзьями, так бы неприменно пришла-ушла. Я ни копеички не потратила на это днище. Организация - говно Людей -мало Музыка и развлечения? - тухло. Если Вы так ненавидите свою аудиторию и хотите сэкономить на н…
custom 53685766760935236903custom 52490096012312246911custom 52537045631264521661custom 53684205969819884511
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @CzNnk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Когда тигры курили” (@CzNnk), 32 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CzNnk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.