info lagu galau segalau galau galaunya

Channel
#12 ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
@DAGGERsq
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
1,871subscribers
-80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001368547816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DAGGERsq |
| Created | 10 October 2020 โ measured โ cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DAGGERsq |
Topic
Music โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 1,871 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 1,876 | -14 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 1,890 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 1,899 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 1,905 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 1,909 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 1,913 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 1,918 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 1,924 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 1,934 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 1,942 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 1,950 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 1,951 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 1,951 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 24 February 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
61 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 34 | 55.7% | |
| ๐ | 15 | 24.6% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 6.56% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 6.56% | |
| ๐ฅ | 2 | 3.28% | |
| ๐คก | 2 | 3.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2024 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/+xX6gmdxNNqY2NzM1
emng ada yg nungguin nih? ๐
cooming soon.
๐
hai
โค13
#12 ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ pinned ยซPEMBRITAHUANโผ๏ธ saya selaku owner dari @daggersq ingin memberitahukan kepada seluruh member atau subscriber @daggersq bahwasannya dagger squad resmi bubar, adapun yang bersangkutan dengan dagger seperti logo, tema, nama dll tidak boleh di fotocopy/plagiatโฆยป
PEMBRITAHUANโผ๏ธ saya selaku owner dari @daggersq ingin memberitahukan kepada seluruh member atau subscriber @daggersq bahwasannya dagger squad resmi bubar, adapun yang bersangkutan dengan dagger seperti logo, tema, nama dll tidak boleh di fotocopy/plagiat karna kami sudah mengclaim semua di atas tersebut, jika ada yang ketahuan memakai maka kami akan tindak lanjutin, terimakasih. โ deboy.
๐15โค6
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐1
โ## closed โผ๏ธ ##โ
๐4๐1
Photo, posted without a caption
โค๏ธ ๐ฌ โ๏ธ โขโข โ ใ ใ Liked by @daggersq and 10.931.124 others BERKIBARLAH DAGGERKU ๐ฆ๐ฑ # โ โ โโโโโโโ โ โ #
โค15๐ฅ2๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DAGGERsq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
back gaa?
- yaa27%
- YAAAAAA!!!!!73%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2024 to 17 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 235 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@OFCWHYVERN ยท 384 postsBUBAR
@seindahsenyumanmu ยท 2294 posts๐unwoniest
@eunwoniest ยท 153 posts๐ข๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐
@ofcrkj ยท 3323 postsPAID PROMOTE DAGGER
@ppdagger ยท 23 postsOPMEM - OFC RAVENOUS
@ravenousofc ยท 153 postsCLOSE | ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
@ROYALCARIBBEANHOSPITAL ยท 363 posts๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ร๐๐
@ZACHORYOFFICIAL ยท 873 posts[ HIRMIN ] AL๐MNILรNTE ๐
@alumnilontee ยท 252 posts๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ค ๐๐ฒ๐๐ข ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ง
@ANAKNYAIOFC ยท 172 postsแทแฉGแฉแKแฉแแฉ แชEแชIแฏEแY
@BagaskaraDeliveryrp ยท 82 postsโฝ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฝ [BUBAR]
@DOMEST1CA ยท 432 posts๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
@DRAXERTYOFC ยท 172 posts๐๐ช๐ข๐ข๐๐๐จ ๐ฟ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฎ
@gummiesdelivery_mv_mv_mv ยท 192 posts๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ || BUBAR
@MOONROWSCHOOL ยท 852 postsMEMORIES โก
@OFCHYSMELAND ยท 162 postsARSIP LรฮNJING_GฮNKโ๐ฒ๐ช
@ofcmppsloanjing ยท 2592 postsRADEN AYU
@ofcradenayu ยท 82 posts๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฆ
@OfficialDeinos ยท 202 postsPOSTER RIGEL
@officialrigel ยท 842 posts๐ฃ๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ @๐ต๐ฝ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ฝ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐น
@PrimaryClinic ยท 322 postsREXVENDER MPPS
@rexvendermpps ยท 652 posts๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐'๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐
@SNMRETROSQ ยท 212 postsLIST PS
@terpikatsenyumanmuu ยท 32 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ#12 ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐โ (@DAGGERsq), 1,871 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DAGGERsq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.