Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تفکر رتبه‌برتر | دکتر راستگو 🩺

Channel

تفکر رتبه‌برتر | دکتر راستگو 🩺

@DASTYARI_RASTGOO

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

552subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168268406
TypeChannel
Username@DASTYARI_RASTGOO
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DASTYARI_RASTGOO

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

552561556.57 August 2026 — 561 subscribers7 August 2026 — 561 subscribers15 August 2026 — 560 subscribers28 August 2026 — 561 subscribers3 September 2026 — 557 subscribers11 September 2026 — 552 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 551–562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 22:38552-5
3 Sept 2026, 13:17557-4
28 Aug 2026, 05:34561+1
15 Aug 2026, 01:15560-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:00561no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:48561first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

293 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22576.8%
🔥3913.3%
👍206.83%
👏72.39%
🥰20.683%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 22 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Nov 2025, 09:34 UTC578 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تو مگو همه به جنگند و ز صلح من چه آید تو یکی نِه‌ای هزاری، تو چراغ خود برافروز

21🔥2

22 Nov 2025, 09:32 UTC644 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لطفا و لطفا در تعیین هدفتون بلند پرواز باشید به این نگاه نکنید الان توی چه وضعیتی هستین، برای رسیدن به هدفتون هیچوقت به کم قانع نشید. موقعی که وارد مسیر میشید میبینید همه چیز دست در دست هم میده که نزدیک بشید به هدفتون

23🔥3

8 Oct 2025, 17:30 UTC≈2,760 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اون روزایی که با وجود خستگی، باز می‌شینی پای کتاب، اون لحظه‌هایی که با بی‌حوصلگی ولی ادامه می‌دی، دقیقاً همون جا نقطه‌ی تغییره. هیچ قله‌ای یه‌شبه فتح نشده. اگه ادامه بدی، یه روز می‌فهمی تموم اون روزای خاکستری، پله‌هایی بودن که بی‌سروصدا تو رو بردن بالا

20🔥3👏1

8 Oct 2025, 17:29 UTC≈2,680 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بعضی وقتا همه‌چی رو درست انجام می‌دی، ولی نتیجه‌ای که می‌خوای نمی‌گیری. ساعت مطالعه‌ت خوبه، مرور داری، تست می‌زنی… اما بازم حس می‌کنی پیشرفت نمی‌کنی. می‌خوام یه جمله رو از ته دل بگم: “رشد، همیشه با سروصدا همراه نیست.” خیلیا فکر می‌کنن تا وقتی حس فوق‌العاده‌ای ندارن یعنی دارن اشتباه می‌رن. در حالی که واقعیت برعکسه. پیشرفت واقعی معمولاً بی‌صداست، خسته‌کننده‌ست و حتی گاهی شبیه درجا زدنه

17🔥3🥰1

25 Sept 2025, 13:25 UTC≈3,580 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

واقعیت اینه که هر کسی توی مسیر خودش حرکت می‌کنه. چیزی که مهمه تداوم خودته، نه سرعت بقیه یادت باشه: “رقیب اصلی تو دیروز خودتی”

21🥰1

25 Sept 2025, 13:24 UTC≈3,330 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یکی از بزرگترین خطاهایی که موقع درس خوندن و آماده شدن برای دستیاری مرتکب میشیم، مقایسه کردن با بقیه‌ست. اون دوستم ۱۰ ساعت می‌خونه، من ۳ ساعت اون یکی میگه ۵ بار مرور کرده، من فقط ۲ بار یکی میگه همه تستا رو بلده، من نصفشو این مقایسه‌ها جز خورد کردن انگیزه هیچ فایده‌ای نداره

19🔥1

16 Sept 2025, 07:18 UTC≈1,320 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

واقعیت اینه توی‌ دور اول نهایتا ۳۵ درصد مطالب رو مسلط میشید که اونم در صورت عدم مرور مناسب کمتر میشه با هر دور مطالعه بیشتر، حدود ۵-۱۰ درصد مطالب بیشتر توی ذهنتون وارد میشه لطفا اهداف فضایی برای خودتون تعیین نکنید رمز موفقیت کاهش وسواس روی هر دور مطالعه و افزایش مرور هست

15👍4👏1

16 Sept 2025, 07:17 UTC947 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وقتی با بچه های دستیاری صحبت می‌کنم مکرر با این جملات مواجه میشم: خوندم ولی حس یادگیری ندارم تسلط صد در صد وجود نداره انگار هیچی نخوندم نکته ای که باید همیشه یادتون باشه برخلاف مطالب زردی که همیشه شنیدیم، توی مطالعه داشتن یا نداشتن حس یادگیری ملاک نیست هدف فقط یه چیزه: قالب مشخصی رو شکل بدین برای دورهای آخرتون

14👏1

8 Sept 2025, 09:50 UTC943 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مهم‌ترین فاکتور موفقیت توی آزمون دستیاری چیه؟ پایه خوب؟ منبع عالی؟ مرور زیاد؟ . . . هیچ کدوم مهم‌ترین فاکتور تداومه موقعی که شما روزی ۲ ساعت مطالعه مداوم داشته باشین به مراتب بهتر از اینه یه روز ۴ ساعت و یه روز هیچی

🔥63

6 Sept 2025, 12:08 UTC891 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

این جمله رو همیشه به یاد داشته باشین: ((بزرگ‌ترین ریسک، ریسک نکردنه))

👍6👏4

6 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC857 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

باید بدونیم همیشه این فکرا وجود دارن اون چیزی که ما رو شکل میده، جرئت اقدام کردنه چیزی که ما رو تبدیل به انسان میکنه همون حسی که ‌اولین بار پرواز رو‌ به انسان یاد داد همون حسی که پای ما رو به فضا باز کرد همون‌ حسی که بدون توقف در حال گسترش دادن مرزهای دانشه همون تمایل ورود به دنیای ناشناخته ها

14

6 Sept 2025, 12:06 UTC760 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یکی از چیزایی که همیشه وقتی اول مسیر هستیم اذیتمون میکنه، ترس از نشدنه اگه رشته مورد نظرم قبول نشم چی؟ اگه کاری که شروع کردم نگیره چی؟ اگه نتونم به کشور مد نظر مهاجرت کنم چی؟

10👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DASTYARI_RASTGOO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تفکر رتبه‌برتر | دکتر راستگو 🩺” (@DASTYARI_RASTGOO), 552 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DASTYARI_RASTGOO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.