唯一官方 服务号 telegram ( https://t.me/+42777 ) 唯一官方 解除+86限制无法私聊的机器人 @SpamBot 唯一官网 https://telegram.org/ 除唯一官方服务号以外的都是假冒骗子号,并且服务号不会发中文汉字信息 除唯一官方解除限制解除无法私聊机器人以外,其余都是假冒骗子号,并且也不会用中文信息回复 认清楚唯一官网,并且官网也不会以中文显示!
❤20

Channel
@DBnewgirl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12,251subscribers
-540 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002459220987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DBnewgirl |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DBnewgirl |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 12,251 | -26 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 12,277 | -33 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 12,310 | -28 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 12,338 | -32 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 12,370 | -36 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 12,406 | -36 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 12,442 | -18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 12,460 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 12,468 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 12,477 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 12,489 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 12,505 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 12,517 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 12,529 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 12,544 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 12,556 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 12,562 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 12,579 | -34 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 12,613 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 12,626 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 4 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
120 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 95.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.33% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2025 to 15 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
唯一官方 服务号 telegram ( https://t.me/+42777 ) 唯一官方 解除+86限制无法私聊的机器人 @SpamBot 唯一官网 https://telegram.org/ 除唯一官方服务号以外的都是假冒骗子号,并且服务号不会发中文汉字信息 除唯一官方解除限制解除无法私聊机器人以外,其余都是假冒骗子号,并且也不会用中文信息回复 认清楚唯一官网,并且官网也不会以中文显示!
❤20
1,私聊你说,我朋友,我小号,我另一个号怎么不能私聊你 2,私聊说你怎么被标记欺诈,标记风险不解除会封号的 3,假冒telegram官方给你发一条消息说你账号有注销风险,有安全限制的要你去解除的 上述一切都是盗号骗子的套路 #检验机器人真假 点击 @SpamBot 不是这个的都是假的盗号的
❤17👍4
再提醒一次: 图中的是假的,是盗号的 一切私聊让你解除什么私聊限制,不解除就会注销或者封号的都是盗号的 官方封禁你根本不用通知你,所有不看提醒被盗号的都活该 别人说什么你就信什么,别人发什么你就点什么,你不被骗谁被骗呢? tg的规则是账号在谁手上,谁就拥有账号,不是你有手机号账号就一定是你的 不看提示被盗号的以后一律别再群里乱叫诉苦哭惨了
❤20
@tongtong160 #童童 #沈阳 #浑南区 #视频认证
❤16
@Jiu_Yue66688 #九月 #视频认证 #沈阳 #铁西区
❤12
- - - - 🥂𝗛𝗮𝗽𝗽𝘆 ଘ(੭ˊᵕˋ)੭* ✩‧₊🥂- - - - 👑海选模式 莞式服务 至尊享受👑 ♨环境高端优雅,颜值巅峰,服务天花板,致 力打造SPA届的理想天堂 ❥约友、请客有面子,这里玩的嗨、玩的刺激、让您体验前所未有的感觉 、洗浴会所、高端SPA、商务KTV、 出击交流群 https://t.me/changchun1122 长春会所资料 https://t.me/changchun000 TG:金宝经理:@qwsz123 电话:13944917736 QQ : 3031484457 24小时电话开机、欢迎骚扰
❤18
@yueyuedaren #悦悦 #沈阳 #上门 #视频认证
❤5👏1
老客户都知道的品质❤️沈阳首家高端连锁情趣小公主体验店 【新凤公馆】全国各大狼友群全部置顶 各地均好评如潮😍 全国连锁门店 东三省各大城市均有直营店 沈阳市为主营总店 全程无人模式 独立公寓酒店标配保障私密性 高端服务只做品质 带给老板顶级体验!🤝不是所有成体馆都叫新凤 所见即所得 来自于新凤定制🥰 口碑说明一切https://t.me/XinF98 频道欢迎鉴赏 新凤欢迎各位老板光临❤️ 客服 @XinF888 ⚡️
❤7
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @DBnewgirl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DBnewgirl named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上新资源频道东北人嫖向全宇宙沈阳大连哈尔滨” (@DBnewgirl), 12,251 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DBnewgirl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.