Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚热点新闻

Channel

东南亚热点新闻

@DFFJTZI

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

58,614subscribers

-11,678 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722155156
TypeChannel
Usernames@DFFJTZI @newsxxnx
Description权威国际新闻,深度报道。 东南亚视角看中国与世界。 #东南亚 #缅甸 #柬埔寨 #泰国 #马来西亚 #越南
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DFFJTZI

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

58,61470,29264,4536 August 2026 — 70,292 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,180 subscribers8 August 2026 — 69,965 subscribers9 August 2026 — 69,740 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69,537 subscribers11 August 2026 — 69,358 subscribers13 August 2026 — 69,062 subscribers14 August 2026 — 68,921 subscribers15 August 2026 — 68,743 subscribers16 August 2026 — 68,453 subscribers17 August 2026 — 68,218 subscribers18 August 2026 — 63,677 subscribers19 August 2026 — 63,571 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,680 subscribers22 August 2026 — 60,631 subscribers24 August 2026 — 60,397 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,246 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,046 subscribers27 August 2026 — 59,970 subscribers28 August 2026 — 59,834 subscribers29 August 2026 — 59,640 subscribers30 August 2026 — 59,500 subscribers31 August 2026 — 59,377 subscribers1 September 2026 — 59,210 subscribers2 September 2026 — 59,020 subscribers3 September 2026 — 58,883 subscribers6 September 2026 — 58,614 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net -11,678. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,862–72,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 06:1958,614-269
3 Sept 2026, 23:5858,883-137
2 Sept 2026, 11:2259,020-190
1 Sept 2026, 09:2659,210-167
31 Aug 2026, 12:3759,377-123
30 Aug 2026, 13:1959,500-140
29 Aug 2026, 11:3459,640-194
28 Aug 2026, 12:2859,834-136
27 Aug 2026, 09:5659,970-76
26 Aug 2026, 08:0360,046-200
25 Aug 2026, 04:5760,246-151
24 Aug 2026, 03:1360,397-234
22 Aug 2026, 10:1460,631-49
20 Aug 2026, 23:0860,680-2,891
19 Aug 2026, 19:4363,571-106
18 Aug 2026, 21:0363,677-4,541
17 Aug 2026, 21:3368,218-235
16 Aug 2026, 22:0368,453-290
15 Aug 2026, 18:1268,743-178
14 Aug 2026, 09:3568,921first reading

Engagement

563 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.28%
avg views ÷ 58,614 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,920
511 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.036%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
511
of 563 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 511 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held563 (6 August 20266 September 2026)
Views total981,300
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,350
Videos
1,680
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 03m
Average length
1m 24s

Measured directly from 131 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1034.5%
724.1%
🔥413.8%
👏310.3%
🤣26.90%
🎉13.45%
😱13.45%
🥰13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 563 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 563 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#泰国 女子一人演两角谈网恋5年,泰国商人被骗700多万泰铢后嫌疑人落网 泰国中央调查局公路警察9月3日公布一起持续多年的网恋诈骗案。43岁女子帕查丽一人假扮“女友”和“姐姐”,陪一名泰国商人“谈恋爱”超过5年,前后骗走700多万泰铢,最终在华富里府被捕。 2020年,帕查丽通过LINE使用年轻女子照片,化名“艾尔”主动接近受害者。两人聊了几个月后发展成恋爱关系,但双方一直没有真正见面。 之后,她又凭空弄出一个“姐姐奥”,自己同时扮演两个角色,让受害者以为自己一直在和一对姐妹分别联系。 接下来的几年里,“艾尔”不断以交通费、住宿费、生活费等理由要钱,还多次声称马上可以继承遗产,等遗产到账就把所有钱还清。 受害者前后转出超过700万泰铢,甚至卖掉部分个人资产继续给钱。 直到2026年2月,受害者开始觉得不对劲,分别录下与“艾尔”和“奥”的电话。两段录音反复比较后,他发现两人的声音几乎一模一样,这才发现所谓“女友”和“姐

6 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC117 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#悬赏 #LiXUe #李雪 此人说她的老公和英国学校校长是十几年朋友,所以介绍我儿子去英国读书,她代为学校帮收学费,但是说要一次性交费USD210200,所以本人转到她的ABA账户,一直问她要缴纳学费的收据清单一直找借口不给,后面本人发邮件向英国学校官方核实确认:LiXUe中文名字李雪仅向学校缴纳6个月学费,剩余学费(USD180000)被她私自留存。本人多次联系她都不回复,也拒绝见面,刻意逃避不想归还剩余学费。我已经取派出所报警立案了,警察去她家已经不在家了。此人还到处去吹牛逼认识什么北京柬埔寨马来西亚大官员等,骗吃骗喝。门牌号,L33A,L35A 街V-16A,谁看见此人请告知我,重赏5000美金。

6 Sept 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#菲律宾 一中国男子利用签证续签搞敲诈勒索被抓 菲律宾国家调查局(NBI)昨天通报,国调局探员日前在帕赛市设伏,当场逮捕一名中国籍男子。 该嫌疑人假称在移民局拥有“人脉”,骗取多名外籍人士护照后,以每本15万比索索要“赎金”,否则拒不归还。 警方在诱捕行动中追回22本中、越等国受害者护照。国调局局长马蒂巴格表示,将以抢劫敲诈、诈骗、严重胁迫及妨碍司法等多项罪名向法院提控该嫌犯,并提醒外籍人士切勿轻信此类“关系”中介。

6 Sept 2026, 13:24 UTC125 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 #老挝万象三江 #娜娜酒店 刚刚被老挝警察包围了,现场正在检查护照和违禁品,所有人都被赶到大厅,今晚三江正在大查,老挝警察到处突击查房,刚刚我朋友在网吧上网也被检查了,大伙小心。

6 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC134 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#群友爆料:包装自己是活菩萨,其实是活阎王;表面做善事,实际是恶魔。 相信很多人刷到很多抖音和快手在缅甸,当阳、万海、木姐、三佛塔等地的救援团队,发布在当地很有实力,能在大多数或者任何园区救人出来,送回国。实际这是新型诈骗,保护伞是他们,正义团队也是他们。 只有一部分那种被榨取干净、做不出业绩,或者被折磨成神经病的人,被公司交给武装人员,然后救援团队拍照宣传,找家人。他们拍照发抖音、快手等社交软件,联系上家人,赎金少则十五万,多则四五十万,才放人回国。披着救援的名义敲诈。 如果接到没价值的“猪仔”,一个多月都联系不上家人,也拿不出钱,会买衣服、理发、包装,教“猪仔”打字、拍自愿视频,让“猪仔”在赌场或者有点实力的当兵人手里借高利贷,把“猪仔”进行二次以上转卖到园区公司。 他们有专用的买卖人头进行交流的群,接单送“猪仔”去出钱买人的公司,支持强押到公司。实际他们就是蛇鼠一窝,背后的恶魔,联合起来披着合法的名义进行诈骗。

6 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#萨拉称长期遭威胁 菲律宾警方回应 目前没有发现已证实威胁 菲律宾副总统萨拉·杜特尔特近日公开表示,自己自2023年以来一直受到 #威胁和骚扰,并称担心孩子安全。 不过,菲律宾国家警察总长何塞·梅伦西奥·纳尔塔特斯回应称,截至目前,萨拉本人及其家人并未向警方正式报告 #相关威胁,警方也没有监测到已证实的安全威胁。 纳尔塔特斯表示,警方已经注意到副总统的担忧,愿意接收她提供的相关文件、报告或证词,并将持续关注其安全。 此前,萨拉因涉嫌发表针对总统马科斯及其家人的 #严重威胁言论,被法院签发逮捕令。她随后缴纳保释金,警方在其前往法院期间提供了安全保障。 目前,围绕萨拉安全问题及其与马科斯政府之间的政治和司法纠纷仍在持续。

6 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#菲律宾 众议院拟调查电力合作社交易!前议员警告涉嫌被私人资本接管 菲律宾众议院近日支持推动调查 SOCOTECO II 与 IGNITE 电力能源公司之间的合资交易,前众议员卡洛斯·萨拉特更公开警告,交易可能导致电力合作社资产和消费者权益受到影响。 萨拉特 #质疑,相关全民公投推进过快,在协议细节、法律问题及透明度仍存在争议的情况下就安排投票,可能让消费者无法充分了解交易对未来电费和管理权的影响。 他呼吁众议院能源委员会立即展开调查,并建议在调查完成、相关文件充分公开前,暂缓全民公投。 支持者认为,SOCOTECO II作为电力合作社,其资产本质上属于消费者成员,不能成为私人资本牟利的工具。 目前,众议院将进一步审查这项交易 #是否存在违规、透明度不足及公共资产私有化等问题。

6 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#群友投稿 谁来监督赌场? 场地是赌场的,荷官是赌场的,牌具是赌场的,牌靴是赌场的,监控也是赌场的。 消费者唯一拥有的,就是自己的钱。 赌场说:“我们要防止玩家作弊。” 可以。 但谁来监督赌场?一个赌场每天流动的是巨额资金。 这些国家连普通社会治理都存在贪污腐败、利益输送和监管失灵。面对赌场这种巨大利益场景,凭什么只要求消费者一句:“相信我们。” 更讽刺的是,大家心里都明白:赌场里的钱,本身就可能牵涉各种复杂的利益关系。 当地的利益集团也知道,有些赌客的钱未必干净; 赌客的钱可能是从别人那里坑蒙拐骗来的; 可一旦进入赌场这个巨大利益场,最后到底是谁在骗谁? 如果普通人被杀了,想讨一个说法都未必容易。 你的钱可能是坑蒙拐骗别人来的,当地的利益集团也可能反过来坑蒙拐骗你。 到了最后,普通消费者拿着自己的钱,却可能面对一个自己根本无法独立验证的封闭系统。 设备由赌场提供,荷官由赌场管理,监控由赌场掌控,发生争议时关键证据也掌握

6 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC129 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨新闻 86名涉嫌网络诈骗及其他犯罪活动的越南公民被遣返 9月6日据柬埔寨内政部消息,9月4日,在副首相兼内政部长萨尔索卡的指导下,柬埔寨移民总局将86名越南公民遣返回国,其中包括28名女性。 柬方表示,这些人员涉嫌非法越境、吸DU、有组织犯罪、非法居留、无证工作及网络诈骗等违法犯罪活动。 柬埔寨当局强调,将继续依法打击网络诈骗及其他跨境犯罪活动,并加强对非法居留和违法外国人的调查、处理及遣返,以维护国家安全和社会秩序。

5 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC253 viewsread 6 September 2026
Photo

#群友投稿 最近跟同事出去玩,好几个同事都找了兰卡妹子,除了有点黑,都挺好看的,看得我心痒痒。 问他们怎么找的也不说,想问下群里的大屌们,这些兰卡妹子都怎么找的,单身30年了,黄金右手撸不动了,想找个兰卡妹子共度余生了。

5 Sept 2026, 15:48 UTC238 viewsread 6 September 2026
Photo

#群友投稿 我们公司在九月1号晚上从柬埔寨到的老挝乌多姆赛省猛塞县 3号凌晨刚确定准备开工,设备电脑那些刚弄好,确定5号开工,4号马上就有30多个老挝乌多姆赛省猛塞县的警察过来,应该是当地人举报,现在老挝哪里都抓得严,老挝警察也想捞钱,那时候我在外面,所以我没事,下面业务员拍照发给我,我就马上开车过去场地看, 目前我们老板正在跟老挝警察谈价格,今天刚问到老板确定下来,有护照的3万人民币,没有护照的五万人民币,目前正在筹钱赎人, 60几个人算是没有护照的跟有护照的也要40万美金,60多部电脑跟100多部手机设备也都收走了,赎设备目前也还在谈价格。

5 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC236 viewsread 6 September 2026
Photo

#西港“太空人”被曝多次换名躲纠纷,贵州籍电子烟卖家遭实名投诉。 网友投稿曝光一名贵州籍男子。此人在Telegram上原名“太空人”,后改名“蜡笔小新”,现用名“A.爱都爱了”,目前待在西港,据称从事电子烟生意。爆料人称多次沟通无果,对方既不解决问题也不给说法,甚至回避见面。爆料人放话:“给你说了有钱钱打发,没钱话打发。”“你就在西港那么大的地方呆着,有碰面的时候。”并表示将持续在各大社交平台曝光,直到对方出来把事情解决。 一个名字改三次的人,你指望他能有什么担当?太空人、蜡笔小新、爱都爱了——名字换得比谁都勤,事情躲得比谁都远。西港不大,圈子更小,你今天躲得了这个号,明天换得了那个名,但脸是换不掉的。提醒东南亚的华人朋友,跟此人打交道前先想想:一个连自己叫什么都不敢固定的人,能靠谱到哪里去?希望这位当事人尽早出面把事情解决,躲不是办法,越躲名越臭。

Showing the 12 most recent of 563 posts we hold for @DFFJTZI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚热点新闻” (@DFFJTZI), 58,614 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DFFJTZI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.