Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东莞靠谱出击报告

Channel

东莞靠谱出击报告

@DGKPCJ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10,060subscribers

+2,224 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003089443744
TypeChannel
Username@DGKPCJ
Description各群报告榜鱼龙混杂,为方便群友。此报告榜将靠谱出击选手设为管理自已分享报告。如发表不靠谱报告,将踢出发表权限。(限发表98在榜老师报告) 出现在此的好评报告不容易,对老师是种认可,能在此发表报告的群友,也说明在东莞有一定公信力,老师接待应更加细心周到😋
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DGKPCJ

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,83610,0608,9487 August 2026 — 7,836 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,838 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,960 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,163 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,347 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,448 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,533 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,603 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,678 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,717 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,796 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,822 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,834 subscribers1 October 2026 — 9,130 subscribers7 October 2026 — 9,223 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,568 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,802 subscribers19 October 2026 — 9,839 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,861 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,896 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,953 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,985 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,012 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,049 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,053 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,049 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,060 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,502–10,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 07:1110,060+11
6 Nov 2026, 09:3510,049-4
5 Nov 2026, 09:5110,053+4
4 Nov 2026, 08:3910,049+37
3 Nov 2026, 05:1810,012+27
31 Oct 2026, 02:099,985+32
28 Oct 2026, 08:399,953+57
25 Oct 2026, 18:259,896+35
22 Oct 2026, 08:079,861+22
19 Oct 2026, 05:299,839+37
16 Oct 2026, 08:359,802+234
13 Oct 2026, 16:019,568+345
7 Oct 2026, 11:379,223+93
1 Oct 2026, 02:579,130+296
16 Sept 2026, 13:198,834+12
12 Sept 2026, 20:158,822+26
8 Sept 2026, 18:198,796+79
3 Sept 2026, 01:028,717+39
30 Aug 2026, 13:188,678+75
27 Aug 2026, 07:238,603first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 10,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held116 (1 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total37,703
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
26
Videos
3
Links
743

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 70 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14184.4%
👍105.99%
😁95.39%
👏31.80%
💩31.80%
🤮10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (12.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 06:34 UTC525 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11.8 验证留名:白小纯 所在位置:松山湖 老师名称:米🉑 老师电报:@MiKo6888 上课价格:700p 妹子年龄:嫩妹,很润 总体评分(满分10分): 9 容貌评分:9 身材评分:9 服务评分:8 环境评分:10 自由评论: 《临江仙·再返米🉑》 曾记惊鸿人海里,春云半掩星眸。 几朝思绪涨如潮。分襟犹带笑,私语渐成谣。 谁信重逢秋绝时,风前鬓影萧萧。 旧歌重听怯深宵。街灯明灭处,匆匆不见卿。 欲知详情请看这里 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

❤2

Signed 通天教主白小纯

8 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC584 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11月初 验证留名:白小纯 所在位置:松山湖 老师名称:叁月 老师电报:@Sanyue51 上课价格:p 妹子年龄:服务型爱师 总体评分(满分10分): 9 容貌评分:8 身材评分:8 服务评分:10(情绪价值拉满) 环境评分:10 自由评论: 《七绝·叁月》 玖月秋霖润如酥, 遥看草色近无时。 一年最是秋好处, 绝胜烟霞满帝畿。 初夜 再回首 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

❤2

Signed 通天教主白小纯

7 Nov 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11.6 验证留名:小牙签 所在位置:虎门 老师名称:#曦曦 老师电报:@mo_asao1005 上课价格:1100包时 妹子年龄:问就18,实际课表写了 总体评分(满分10分): 10(叠个甲:萝卜青菜各有所爱) 容貌评分: 10 身材评分:10 服务评分:10 环境评分:7 自由评论: 有一句怎么说来着,哦是久别胜新婚,好大宝一回家就是两个月,把我憋坏了,两颗铃铛都装得满满当当,终于可以释放了。好大宝休息两个月皮肤是变得又白又嫩紧致,已经被彻底榨干了,以至于到现在才缓过来,写个报告。 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): t.me/+I3kbipSXArw1MWU1 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

❤2

Signed 大大 牙签(唯系卿心)

6 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC969 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11.03 验证留名:小DD 所在位置:大朗 老师名称:#子涵 老师电报:@zihang520 上课价格:600/P 妹子年龄:20 总体评分(满分10分): 容貌评分: 8 身材评分: 9 服务评分: 10 环境评分: 8 自由评论: 等待酒局上号闲聊,热情打招呼邀约大战。 内心os:十五十六,唔劈唔舒服,反正时间尚早。 居然翘班去逛商场,电梯一起上楼,开门反手打个措手不及。双方大战三百回合,归功于最近的养精蓄锐,打得那叫一个不相上下热火朝天。可依旧未能满钟下课,但再次体验了常服作战还是美滋滋的😁 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

👍2

Signed 小滨州 (小DD)

6 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC897 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:10.31 验证留名:小DD 所在位置:大朗 老师名称:#奶茶 老师电报:@hdswww666 上课价格:600/P 妹子年龄:20+ 总体评分(满分10分): 容貌评分: 9 身材评分:8 服务评分:10 环境评分:10 自由评论: 太久没喝奶茶了,临时约上奶茶尾课去学习学习 这次甜份十足,还会撒娇,老夫的心要被勾住了!! 不愧是狼嫂,白白净净的好喝 爱喝 经常要喝 本次体验课十分好评:浅喉,动力火车,腿软出门 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

👍1

Signed 小滨州 (小DD)

6 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC898 viewsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11月初 验证留名:紧急联络人 所在位置:大朗 老师名称:宝宝 老师电报:@dlbb008 上课价格:6p 妹子年龄:19 总体评分(满分10分): 8.8 容貌评分: 8 身材评分:9 服务评分:8 环境评分:9 自由评论: 三返 和宝宝熟络不少 有跟她说了下上课时的一些小缺点(厚密们去了和我说的🤣🤣🤣)望改进 依然相处舒服 会再返 之前的的车评 车评 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

Signed 烟 花

6 Nov 2026, 02:11 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 上课时间:2026-11-02 验证留名:奔儿波霸 所在位置:#大朗 老师名称:#念念 老师电报:@niannian3232 上课价格:600p 妹子年龄:18 总体评分(满分10分):10 容貌评分:9 身材评分:9 服务评分:10 环境评分:9 自由评论: 不带滤镜的评论 【优点】 有点飒的机车小姐姐,性格爽朗,待客热情。妆后颜值8-9分,很好看。身材匀称,皮肤光滑,B胸但挺拔,屁股大且翘。敏感,做爱投入,反馈好。 【缺点】 黄皮偏黑,身上较多伤(骑机车摔得)。 带滤镜的评论 第5️⃣次出击 今天是战损版,妆容没掉完,但已经花了好多,不过颜值还是很漂亮。妹妹一点力气都没了,而且腿疼13疼。所以主要是聊天,看妹妹买头盔,等妹妹恢复了一点体力我们才试着做了一会儿,喜欢跟妹妹做爱的感觉。 妹妹又要休息出去玩…

❤2

Signed 奔儿 波霸

5 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11-5 验证留名:jane 所在位置:厚街 老师名称:泡沫 老师电报:@paomodepo 上课价格:600 妹子年龄:20 总体评分(满分10分): 9 容貌评分: 9 身材评分:9 服务评分:9 环境评分:9 自由评论:老师佛系程度有点超乎想象啊…约了几次才约到!狼哥是不是你包月了… 具体怎么样可参考上一篇报告 在厚街,那么近,有空就可以过来打卡,不用跑那么远了 狼叔别电我,我不是有心的,我真的忘记帮你拿嫂子的内裤跟内衣(老师的蕾丝透明内衣+内裤) 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

Signed Jane-戒黄导师

4 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,020 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11.04 验证留名:大善人 所在位置:南城 老师名称:#佳(夹)念 老师电报:@JJ57005 上课价格:688P 妹子年龄:20 总体评分(满分10分): 9 容貌评分: 9 身材评分:9 服务评分:10 环境评分:9 自由评论: 感觉佳念已经不需要靠报告来证明自己了,为了水积分还是写一下。 优点:很好聊天,地方干净卫生,嫩妹,无敌老虎钳永动机(已经断了),舌吻换动作什么都很配合,氛围感满满 缺点:胸比较小(我不吃胸,小小的也很可爱!),烟嗓非甜妹音(我也喜欢),打飞机的技术比较差(她说基本没有需要她打的) 小黄文: 约了很久才约到佳念,一直放我飞机,结果到了楼下还罚站了十分钟(过程我说看到一个两百斤肥婆上去了她说那就是她)。几经波折终于进门,看到一个可可爱爱小嫩妹,和烟嗓形成…

❤4😁1

Signed 大善人(耶耶爱徒版)

3 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,330 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:11.03 验证留名:大善人 所在位置:南城 老师名称:#小白兔 老师电报:@ZGXBT 上课价格:600P 妹子年龄:18 总体评分(满分10分): 6 容貌评分: 8 身材评分:6 服务评分:3 环境评分:5 自由评论: 好的地方在于,确实嫩妹,紧,我秒了,人照很对版,态度比较积极,身材比较高挑,腿不错,任盘任🐍。 不好的在于,有点小肚子,真的太新人了,几乎没有主动性,但要求啥基本也有,但我喜欢比较主动的,然后很害羞,不让盯着看,体位啥的都要教才行,没有服装(说是在买了) 没灵感写小黄文了,总结一下,喜欢开发嫩妹的,频道样子喜欢的可以去看看,其他控就一般吧。 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉…

❤3

Signed 大善人(耶耶爱徒版)

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @DGKPCJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DGKPCJ edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东莞靠谱出击报告” (@DGKPCJ), 10,060 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DGKPCJ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.