DGroup Capital Channel pinned a photo

Channel
DGroup Capital Channel
@DGroup_Channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,599subscribers
-12,618 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001654257233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DGroup_Channel |
| Description | Welcome to Dgroup Capital – A Leading Global Community Marketing for all crypto projects 🚀|#Airdrop #AMA| Group Chat: @DGroup_Capital 👤DM for Marketing: @Mai_ThanhVN ▶️ We connect 300+ KOL Network. 💎 More info: https://beacons.ai/dgroup.capital |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DGroup_Channel |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 22,599 | -1,121 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 23,720 | -380 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 24,100 | -64 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 24,164 | -355 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 24,519 | -1,211 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 25,730 | +9,231 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 16,499 | -1,890 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 18,389 | -446 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 18,835 | -67 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 18,902 | -571 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:53 | 19,473 | -565 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 20,038 | -43 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 20,081 | -641 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 20,722 | -1,330 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 22,052 | -390 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 22,442 | -640 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 23,082 | -783 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 23,865 | -234 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 24,099 | -374 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 24,473 | first reading |
Engagement
155 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.8%
- avg views ÷ 22,599 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,660
- 51 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.98%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 53
- of 155 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 155 (1 August 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 135,501 |
| Reactions total | 4,036 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 14:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 550
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 321
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,817 reactions across 152 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,292 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 1,185 | 11.0% | |
| 🎉 | 1,180 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,152 | 10.6% | |
| 💯 | 803 | 7.42% | |
| 🥰 | 758 | 7.01% | |
| ❤🔥 | 754 | 6.97% | |
| 😍 | 718 | 6.64% | |
| 🤩 | 714 | 6.60% | |
| 😁 | 508 | 4.70% | |
| 🏆 | 291 | 2.69% | |
| ⚡ | 150 | 1.39% | |
| 🐳 | 149 | 1.38% | |
| 🌭 | 147 | 1.36% | |
| 🍾 | 144 | 1.33% | |
| 🍓 | 140 | 1.29% | |
| 👌 | 137 | 1.27% | |
| 🤡 | 130 | 1.20% | |
| 💋 | 119 | 1.10% | |
| 🙈 | 118 | 1.09% | |
| 29 further kinds | 228 | 2.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 152 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,817 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💸 Bitcoin Slides to $82.7K as Market Liquidations Approach $550M Bitcoin fell to an October low of approximately $82,734 as escalating tensions involving Iran pushed oil prices and global bond yields higher, triggering a broader sell-off across risk assets. Total crypto liquidations reached nearly $547 million within 24 hours a 235% increase with Ether accounting for around $174 million. ETH dropped roughly 5%, whi…
❤🔥11🥰11💯10🎉9🤩9❤8😍6🔥5
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
DGroup Capital is proud to announce that we are an official Media Partner of Cyprus Fintech Week 2027 🇨🇾 On 5 May 2027, Cyprus Fintech Week will bring fintech leaders, founders, investors and technology professionals together in Paphos for a day of ideas and connections across the future of finance. From banking and payments to trading, digital assets, AI, cybersecurity and blockchain, the event will create space f…
❤23❤🔥21💯21🎉19🥰19👍18🔥13🤩13
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
Hyperliquid’s Singapore Status Raises Regulatory Questions! Hyperliquid Labs has confirmed that its registered headquarters are in Singapore, but the Monetary Authority of Singapore says it does not consider the decentralized trading platform to fall within its regulatory jurisdiction. MAS told the Financial Times that it was unaware of Hyperliquid being regulated in any major jurisdiction. Hyperliquid, meanwhile, …
👍25❤🔥22🎉19🔥18💯17😍17❤16🤩13
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
💸 Winklevoss Files for Spot Zcash ETF Under Ticker WINK! Winklevoss Asset Services has filed an S-1 registration statement with the U.S. SEC for a spot Zcash ETF expected to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker WINK. The proposed fund would: • Hold ZEC directly to track its market price • Charge an annual management fee of 0.25% • Use Gemini Trust Company to custody the assets • Operate as a passive investment vehicle …
❤12🌭10🏆10💋9👌8🍓7🕊6👾1
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
🪙 Solana Launches Institutional Settlement Infrastructure The Solana Foundation has introduced Solana DvP, an open-source settlement program designed for banks, custodians, exchanges and other financial institutions. DvP or Delivery-versus-Payment ensures that an asset and its corresponding payment are transferred simultaneously within a single atomic transaction. Either both sides settle together or neither does, …
🥰13❤12🎉9👍8🤩8❤🔥7😍7💯6
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
DGroup Capital is proud to be an official Media Partner of ClickUp Comes to Cyprus🇨🇾! For the first time, ClickUp is bringing its team to Cyprus for an in-person event in Limassol. It’s an opportunity for business owners, managers and teams to see how the platform supports project management and daily workflows, directly from a ClickUp representative. The evening will feature live demonstrations, including how AI a…
⚡9🍓9🍾9👌9🏆8💋8💯7🌭6
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
ZachXBT Fronted $349,700 to Infiltrate a Lazarus-Linked Laundering Network Onchain investigator ZachXBT revealed that he posed as a client of a Chinese laundering syndicate allegedly responsible for moving more than $1 billion across multiple hacks linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. To earn the group’s trust, he fronted 349,700 USDC and conducted transactions with a contact known as “Jimmy Green,” accepting an …
❤12🤩10🎉9🥰8😍6👍5🔥5❤🔥4
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
DGroup Capital Channel pinned a photo
EINSTEIN AI TRADING & AUTOMATION IN ONE PLATFORM Tired of switching between multiple tools to analyze markets, identify signals and manage your trades? Einstein brings AI-powered market analysis and trading automation together in one streamlined platform. 🎁 GET 20% OFF WITH CODE: "DGROUPCAPITAL20" What Einstein offers: - AI Asset Analysis: Analyze trends, momentum, volatility and risk - Trading Bots: Grid Bot, DCA…
❤18🔥10😍10💯7👍6❤🔥3🎉3🤩2
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
CFTC Moves to Bring Leveraged Crypto Trading Under Federal Oversight Following the Clarity Act’s failure to advance in Congress, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed two rules aimed at creating a federal pathway for crypto exchanges offering leveraged or margined trading to retail investors. Under the framework, participating platforms would face CFTC supervision, including registration, marke…
⚡12🍾12🌭11🐳9🍓7👌7🏆5🕊5
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
💸 Bitcoin Corporate Bitcoin Treasuries Keep Growing Two of the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin holders have expanded their positions but through very different strategies. Strategy purchased another 334 BTC for $28.7 million, paying an average of approximately $85,839 per Bitcoin. The Michael Saylor-led company now holds exactly 848,000 BTC, representing more than 4% of Bitcoin’s maximum 21 million supply. Meanw…
👌10🌭9🏆8🕊7🤡6🍓5🍾5🐳5
Signed Mai Thanh |DGroup
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @DGroup_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@DGroup_Channel edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@EliteCryptoCalls · 3,504#1
@asteroid_ventures_channel · 4,702#2
@Memegems_Channel · 1,488#3
@CryptoSolutionAnn · 58,501#4
@imcommunityit · 1,760#5
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 275,966#6
@skyrimcall · 9,832#7
@GlobalExploreCalls · 33,550#8
@MetaBlockchainNews · 88,496#9
@cryptoastronautnews · 56,150#10
@Dr_Crypto_Chemist_Plays · 1,716#11
@shineigems · 15,508#12
@CryptoWorldClub_News · 118,870#13
@CryptoBitBull_Channel · 1,043#14
@Future_Lounge_Calls · 9,048#15
@GobellCallss · 4,542#16
@DTCGroupchannel · 5,498#17
@geekchatNews · 6,901#18
@cryptopandaann · 55,934#19
@degenable · 1,302#20
@decentralizedclub · 4,100#21
@cryptominers_news · 9,766#22
@diamondalphacalls · 2,187#23
@belfsreviews · 2,389#24
@crypto_whale_global_annn · 41,837#25
@DCACalls · 2,731#26
@cryptocatcalls · 8,079#27
@R5Gems · 1,518#28
@crypto_millennial · 5,187#29
@BasedCryptoCall · 290#30
@CryptoHEATPlays · 370#31
@cryptwallstreetcalls · 2,641#32
@CryptoArenaOfficialAnn · 32,511#33
@CryptoFi_news · 44,172#34
@DubaicryptowhalesNews · 52,820#35
@divacalls · 703#36
@metamoonshots · 35,447#37
@brownie_eth · 899#38
@Crypto_Trust_CommunityAnn · 62,401#39
@SunriseVenturesAnn · 110,027#40
@Chihiros_gambles · 359#41
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 115,906#42
@cryptodetectorann · 28,940#43
@borutoDiary · 964#44
@InayaNews · 4,213#45
@CIAinsiders · 683#46
@Cryptocity_News · 5,818#47
@BigBangCall · 17,462#48
@elite333calls · 2,415#49
@APEDGEMSCALLS · 3,311#50
@Crypto_Rush_News · 8,163#51
@WaltonCalls · 3,364#52
@CrizalAlpha · 3,872#53
@CryptoTVOT_News · 241,147#54
@dackoo_official · 17,488#55
@GlobalCryptoBullsANN · 7,445#56
@Crypto_FinderNews · 131,813#57
@cryptonationama · 2,772#58
@cryptoclashann · 16,175#59
@LowCarbonToken · 100,698#60
@BazzysResearch · 1,576#61
@MetaWhaleNews · 32,119#62
@Acidonmeliketheraincalls · 3,369#63
@CryptoMoonShootNews1 · 195,027#64
@trucallchannelno1 · 749#65
@CryptoPandaGems_1 · 31,304#66
@Tork_LabsAnn · 51,707#67
@BlockchainExpressAnn · 31,002#68
@fxrickofficial · 20,009#69
@Crypto_InfinityNews · 81,137#70
@Crypto_Planet_GlobalChannel · 53,818#71
@CryptoWolf_News · 50,640#72
@CryptoPowerAnn · 55,668#73
@CryptoAvenueNews · 155,221#74
@satoshi_club_events · 9,823#75
@ElonMuskCallz · 3,235#76
@blockchainsecrets · 1,406#77
@AlextheGreatCalls · 909#78
@Africanwhalescall · 1,895#79
@andyshoutout · 2,383#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@GlobalExploreCalls · 33,550
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 September 2026
@Cookiesales · 70,413
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@dtectoken · 20,687
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
@CryptoSolutionAnn · 58,501
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@CryptoWorldClub_News · 118,870
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@Gemhunterrs · 1,006,039
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
@DubaicryptowhalesNews · 52,820
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026
@BlockchainExpressAnn · 31,002
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
@CryptoAvenueNews · 155,221
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
@satoshi_club_channel · 35,983
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@CryptoArenaOfficialAnn · 32,511
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@MetaWhaleNews · 32,119
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@cryptopandaann · 55,934
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 115,906
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@CryptoFi_news · 44,172
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
@CoinLabVerseNews · 121,527
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
@CryptoMoonShootNews1 · 195,027
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
@Tork_LabsAnn · 51,707
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
@LowCarbonToken · 100,698
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@Crypto_PoolzAnn · 50,697
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
@SunriseVenturesAnn · 110,027
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@Cryptoelephant_News · 161,275
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DGroup Capital Channel” (@DGroup_Channel), 22,599 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DGroup_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.