Photo, posted without a caption
🤬5😢3🙏2❤1

Channel
@DNR_SCKK
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
14,627subscribers
-147 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001136723856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DNR_SCKK |
| Description | Управление АГиП ДНР по вопросам документирования военных преступлений Украины - официальная информация о последствиях военных преступлений Украины. Регистрация РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/69d5f6b7202100fe1682d7e6 |
| Created | 25 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNR_SCKK |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:54 | 14,627 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:20 | 14,626 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:47 | 14,623 | +3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 14,620 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:15 | 14,614 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 14,620 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 14,619 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 14,621 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 14,619 | +9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:40 | 14,610 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 14,614 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 14,607 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 14,608 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:34 | 14,609 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:39 | 14,610 | +4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 14,606 | +2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 14,604 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 14,603 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 14,606 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 14,613 | first reading |
128 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 128 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 90,170 |
| Reactions total | 420 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 05:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,999 reactions across 124 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 830 | 41.5% | |
| 🤬 | 677 | 33.9% | |
| 😢 | 343 | 17.2% | |
| ❤ | 88 | 4.40% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 1.35% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 0.95% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 0.65% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.05% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,071 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
🤬5😢3🙏2❤1
Два человека погибли, еще пятнадцать мирных жителей Республики, в том числе ребенок, пострадали сегодня из-за атак БПЛА ВФУ 📍В результате ночных ударов в Куйбышевском районе Донецка погибли женщины 1938 и 1975 г.р. Также ранены: женщина 1961 г.р., мужчины 1946 и 1964 г.р., пострадали мужчина 1991 г.р., девочка 2017 г.р., парень 2008 г.р. 📍В Кировском районе Донецка вследствие атаки на жилой дом ранена женщина 1993 …
😢9🤬6🙏2
Photo, posted without a caption
😢10🤬8🙏3❤1
Шесть мирных жителей Республики пострадали сегодня из-за атак ударных БПЛА ВФУ. 📍В Киевском районе Донецка ранен мужчина 1985 г.р. 📍В Центрально-Городском районе Горловки при атаке на автобус городского маршрута ранены мужчины 1963 и 1970 г.р. 📍В Никитовском районе Горловки ранен мужчина 1960 г.р. 📍На автодороге Волноваха-Тельманово вблизи села Гранитное Тельмановского муниципального округа при атаке на грузовой …
😢14🤬4🙏2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤬14😢6🙏1
Один человек погиб, еще пять мирных жителей Республики пострадали сегодня из-за атак ударных БПЛА ВФУ. 📍В Пролетарском районе Донецка в результате атаки на автозаправочную станцию во время заправки автобусов городских маршрутов погиб водитель автобуса - мужчина (персональные данные устанавливаются), ранения средней степени тяжести получили водители автобусов - мужчины 1970, 1969 и 1965 г.р. 📍В Докучаевске из-за ата…
🤬18😢3🙏2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏6🤬5😢3💔1
#Военные_преступления_Украины_в_цифрах ⚡️❗️Официально о последствиях вооруженных атак ВСУ на территории Республики (за период с 17.02.2022 по 02.11.2026; 23:00). @DNR_SCKK
🤬14😢1🙏1
Два мирных жителя Республики пострадали сегодня из-за атак ударных БПЛА ВФУ 📍В поселке Свободное Амвросиевского муниципального округа в результате атаки на жилой дом пострадала женщина 1938 г.р. 📍В Ясиноватой пострадал мужчина 1977 г.р. Повреждены три жилые домостроения, пять объектов гражданской инфраструктуры, грузовые автомобили в городских округах Макеевка, Торез, Докучаевск, Горловка, Амвросиевском, Кураховск…
🙏14🤬4😢4💔1
Photo, posted without a caption
😢10🤬3💔2🙏2
На территории Республики 1 ноября из-за атак ударных БПЛА ВФУ погибли два человека, в том числе подросток, еще восемь мирных жителей, в том числе ребенок, пострадали 📍В Кировском районе Донецка погиб подросток, мальчик 2010 г.р., ранен парень 2008 г.р. 📍В Горняцком районе Макеевки вследствие атаки на легковой автомобиль погиб мужчина 1963 г.р., тяжело ранена девочка 2014 г.р., также ранена ее мама, женщина 1989 г.р…
😢7🙏6💔5🤬4❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏7🤬6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @DNR_SCKK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|---|
| YouTube | UCozFRGFyd9tyidNGq3O2buA |
| Official site | https://dnr-sckk.ru/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Факты военных преступлений Украины” (@DNR_SCKK), 14,627 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNR_SCKK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.