10 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC3 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @astreaoverhPhoto
ֹ ⏤ ֹ @ . сефа
Channel
ĐЕØ𝐍𝐈Ṧ ﾒ archive
@DNSarch1ve
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003480281256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DNSarch1ve |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNSarch1ve |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 36 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 37 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 38 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 45 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 45 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
10 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC3 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @astreaoverh
отмените отмену днс быстрее
10 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC4 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
https://t.me/vv3xar/3176 але блять твоему аккаунту было 6 мать его часов кто ьебя ссаться будет ты себя видел нахуй
10 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
https://t.me/vv3xar/3193 Ну, так-то, по факту человек говорит. Очень странно, что такие вещи в целом приходится объяснять. Если у них сейчас союз, это значит, что она поддерживает хорошие отношения. Союз при дерьмовых отношениях невозможен, потому что двум сторонам не выгоден. Более того, напоминаю про ваше же отношение к Люмьеру из-за ебаного Ре*р* в составе их администрации и как вы отнеслись к тому, что он ушел с…
10 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC8 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
блять удивительные вещи - реира НЕ анонимно срёт только ###)) даже войд, выступающий против - аноним.
10 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
https://t.me/vv3xar/3214 И почему вообще такие люди не в бане?
10 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
Я дико извиняюсь конечно, а в чем суть вообще фильтрации по членам определенного флуда, если от их лица пропускаются тейки?
10 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC11 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
https://t.me/vv3xar/3177 а в чем обида если мне напрямую сказали, что проблема в новом акке?
10 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC11 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
https://t.me/vv3xar/3178 ну так и в чем твоя проблема? к слову угадали же, раз ты обидки кидаешь, там таких сжирают
10 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC10 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
https://t.me/vv3xar/3181 так это же не я побежал что они ссутся когда меня не взяли)) просто принял и все, да и думаю, на вопрос "куда твинк принимают" тебе ### никто не кидал
10 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC8 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
какой смысл в запрете на ### если здесь его обсжудают
10 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC9 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vv3xar
https://t.me/vv3xar/3182 ну маладэс, ток ты ошибся в своих умозаключениях я изначально в анкету админам первого флуда вписал что ищу флуды где не ссут брать с новым акком ### мне эмберлин нахваливали из-за союза и говорили, что там крутые ребята я просил сс на все проекты, лавки/хейты и прочее, за одно и инфо на этот чат, раз его хвалят я в шоках что это: толи корона, толи паранойя в обычном тейке про поиск новых фл…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DNSarch1ve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ĐЕØ𝐍𝐈Ṧ ﾒ archive” (@DNSarch1ve), 36 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNSarch1ve.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.