#泰国资讯::泰老警方联手打击跨国电诈团伙,32人遭签发逮捕令,17名嫌疑人落网 11月5日,泰国网络安全警察分局(ACSC)宣布,成功破获一起涉及泰国与老挝的跨国电信诈骗案件,共有32名嫌疑人被法院签发逮捕令,目前已有17人被警方抓获。 据泰国警方通报,此案源于老挝波乔省(Bokeo)警方此前开展的打击网络诈骗行动。老挝警方在顿蓬县(Ton Pheung)查获相关诈骗人员及作案设备后,将案件线索移交泰国方面,双方随后展开跨境警务合作。 调查发现,该犯罪团伙组织严密、分工明确,长期利用境外窝点实施电话诈骗。团伙成员首先冒充移动通信运营商工作人员,谎称受害人的电话号码涉嫌违法犯罪,随后将电话转接给冒充普吉府市警局警察的诈骗人员。 诈骗人员通过LINE视频通话与受害者联系,穿着类似警察制服的服装,并使用伪造的政府文件、法院命令及银行账户资料,制造受害人涉嫌犯罪的假象,进一步威胁恐吓受害人,要求将资金转入指定的傀儡账户。 泰…

Channel
【实时】东南亚大事件
@DNY3030
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
175,737subscribers
+114,653 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001910076738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @DNY3030 @nb520 |
| Description | 「海外风云多变幻,人间烟火最关情」 🌐 涵盖区域: #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #泰国 #缅甸 #迪拜 #马来西亚 ✨ 功能板块: #爆料 #求助 #曝光,一应俱全 🔗 关注不迷路:@KK88 📌️️️️️️ 商务/投稿:@my111 @yukio668 欢迎各界知情人士提供线索,匿名安全有保障 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 116 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNY3030 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:26 | 175,737 | -13 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:06 | 175,750 | -70 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:25 | 175,820 | -24 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:44 | 175,844 | -282 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 176,126 | -170 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:24 | 176,296 | -101 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:51 | 176,397 | -64 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:07 | 176,461 | -44 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:29 | 176,505 | -145 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 176,650 | -269 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:06 | 176,919 | -149 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 177,068 | -53 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 177,121 | -130 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 177,251 | -201 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 177,452 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 177,458 | -130 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 177,588 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 177,585 | +1,058 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 176,527 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 176,541 | first reading |
Engagement
2,247 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.59%
- avg views ÷ 175,737 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,800
- 757 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.414%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 757
- of 2,247 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 454 of 757 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,247 (7 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,120,412 |
| Reactions total | 6,119 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 11:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈47,200
- Videos
- ≈11,000
- Links
- ≈32,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6h 34m
- Average length
- 1m 43s
Measured directly from 229 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,274 reactions across 525 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,090 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 984 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 855 | 13.6% | |
| 🤩 | 849 | 13.5% | |
| 🥰 | 841 | 13.4% | |
| 🎉 | 823 | 13.1% | |
| 👏 | 787 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5186433302118008597 | 9 | 0.143% | |
| custom 6145332910418301717 | 7 | 0.112% | |
| custom 5059806104179967649 | 6 | 0.096% | |
| custom 6145560990361587971 | 6 | 0.096% | |
| custom 6052864768501357304 | 4 | 0.064% | |
| custom 6145393997738153846 | 4 | 0.064% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.032% | |
| custom 6337065932753477180 | 1 | 0.016% | |
| custom 6339061829825730551 | 1 | 0.016% | |
| custom 6339347505280457039 | 1 | 0.016% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.016% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.016% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.016% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.016% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 565 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,274 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DNY3030. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 289 of 757 posts held from the last 30 days (38.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#马来新闻:甲州警方昨日在甲市新兴商业区的哥打沙班达花园民宅展开取缔行动,侦破一个以中国公民为目标的“爱情陷阱”与虚假加密货币交易诈骗集团。 马六甲中央警区主任哈林阿答斯发文告表示,警方在此次行动中扣查11名中国籍男子、1名中国籍女子及1名台湾籍男子,众人年龄介于24岁至36岁,同时充公价值约5万令吉的物品。 充公物品包括12台笔记本电脑、1台桌面型电脑、26架各品牌手机及一台路由器。 他说,初步调查,嫌犯是于今年2月至9月间,分别乘飞机从菲律宾、台湾、老挝及中国入境马来西亚,嫌犯均持旅游签证入境,相信在甲州已运作约3个月。他们主要是通过Telegram、QQ及Soul等社交平台物色受害者。 “诈骗分子以甜言蜜语和虚假承诺诱导受害者,诱使对方在虚假的加密货币交易中汇款,并谎称可获得丰厚回酬。受害者所遭受的实际损失金额仍在调查中。” 他指出,所有嫌犯将被延扣4天至本月8日。警方援引刑事法典第420条文(欺骗)及1959/…
🎉6❤4👍4👏3🔥3🥰3
Posted without readable text
❤5🔥5👏4🤩3🥰3🎉2👍2
#老挝资讯:万象市赛塔尼县昌库村查获一网络犯罪团伙 逮捕27名犯罪嫌疑人 11 月 5 日,老挝公安部专项特勤小组对位于老挝万象市赛塔尼县昌库村(Ban Changkhou)第 24 组的一处出租屋展开突击行动,成功捣毁一个从事网络犯罪及非法网络赌博的犯罪团伙,现场逮捕 27 名涉案犯罪嫌疑人。其中,中国籍 26 人,泰国籍 1 人;现场查获扣押作案工具包括手机 805 部、台式电脑 32 台以及笔记本电脑 3 台。 行动结束后,一名女子主动联系执法人员,试图办理取保候审将上述犯罪团伙人员保释出狱。执法人员随即将其控制并展开调查审讯。经查,该名女子名为普维(Nang Pouvieng),现年 31 岁,职业为翻译,户籍位于万象省开乌多姆县萨马基赛村,现居住于万象市西科达崩县拉欣村。 目前,警方正对该案作进一步深入侦查与扩线深挖,全力追查其同伙及幕后主脑。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🫥 一站式东南亚导航:@KK88 ✈️ 免费能量/…
🎉4👏4❤3🔥3🤩3🥰2👍1
金边金街人气回暖?生意仍冷清 11月3日,记者走访金边金街发现,街区人流较此前有所增加,多数餐饮、美容、服装及奶茶店正常营业,还有新店正在装修。部分商户表示,进入10月后,街上的中国面孔比前几个月多了。 今年5月,警方突袭金街一处非法赌场,带走100多人,此后多家娱乐场所关闭,街区生意明显下滑。 不过,记者回访3家餐厅发现,营业额仍处于较低水平。商户反映,虽然街上的人开始多了,但进店消费的顾客并未明显增加。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🫥 一站式东南亚导航:@KK88 ✈️ 免费能量/查U:@hu520 🙂 投稿/商务:@my111
👏5🤩5🎉4🔥3👍2🥰1
#群友爆料:*柬埔寨金边,天一日料店*此店老板,股东之一阿斌。欠一些蔬菜食材款。一直拖延不付。耍赖不认账。我们这边是正常批发食材生意,有报警警察也立案,证据充足。 本地警察让我们找到他人自会抓他。此人找借口说在中国,从年前说到年后过来处理,一直不敢出来处理。怕警察抓。 四千多块钱而已,你一个开餐厅的连给你送菜的人都骗。有何诚信去开餐厅。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🫥 一站式东南亚导航:@KK88 ✈️ 免费能量/查U:@hu520 🙂 投稿/商务:@my111
👍5🔥4🥰4🎉3👏3🤩3❤2
#币圈新闻:11月4日—5日,比特币升破80500美元,日内涨4.23%。
🎉7👍4👏3🔥2🤩2❤1🥰1
#网友投稿 ⚠️【公开举报|请相关部门关注调查】 外号「老万」,人称「万总」 湖北人。 据本人掌握的情况,该人士曾在金运园区创大公司任职,期间得到老板陈心的大力扶持,一步步获得重要职位。然而此人心怀不轨,后来与老板发生矛盾、甚至背后大力度的辱骂老板。 据相关人员反映,该人士曾负责操盘所谓的「英伟达」项目,该项目涉嫌以传销模式运作,涉及资金据称高达3亿元,具体金额有待相关部门核实。 更令人关注的是,关于园区内部管理方式,有员工反映存在殴打、辱骂及体罚现象。 本人表弟曾在老万下面工作。据其向本人反映,因为没有完成业绩,曾遭到殴打,导致双腿骨折。除此之外,员工还被要求上班期间长时间站立,下班后进行鸭子步、扛水桶,以及使用PVC管进行体罚等行为。 据本人了解,该人士后来又参与操盘所谓的「远东黄金」及「BP石油」项目。 其中:远东黄金:据称涉及资金约5000万元。BP石油:具体涉及资金目前未知。 目前还有相关人员向本人反…
🤩5❤3👏3🔥3🎉2👍2🥰1
😄😄😄 #西港 生记门口查车 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🫥 一站式东南亚导航:@KK88 ✈️ 免费能量/查U:@hu520 🙂 投稿/商务:@my111
🎉7🤩5👍4❤3👏1🔥1
Location, posted without a caption
👍7👏5🤩5❤3🎉2🔥2🥰2
😄😄😄 中国驻文莱使馆紧急提醒:近期电信诈骗频发,有中国公民因网络私下交易遭受重大损失 11月4日发布,近日,中国驻文莱大使馆发布安全提醒称,近期在文莱中国公民遭遇电信网络诈骗的案件频发,部分人员因轻信陌生人,通过网络进行私下交易,最终蒙受重大经济损失。 针对近期发生的诈骗案件,使馆提醒在文中国公民提高警惕,谨防各类电信网络诈骗。 使馆指出,不法分子诈骗手段不断翻新,尤其需要警惕冒充中国驻外使领馆、国内政府部门及执法人员的诈骗行为。诈骗分子通常以当事人涉嫌案件、护照或证件存在问题等理由,通过电话、微信等方式索要个人信息、银行账户、短信验证码,甚至要求缴纳所谓的保证金。 此外,日常购物及换汇应通过正规机构或合法平台办理,切勿轻信陌生人的私下交易,不点击来历不明的邮件及网页链接。涉及大额转账汇款时,务必通过多个可靠渠道核实信息。 使馆特别提醒,如不幸遭遇诈骗,应立即向文莱当地警方报案。 如果被骗资金通过中国境内银行账户或支…
❤4👍4👏4🥰4🤩3🎉2🔥1
#群友反馈:金三角特区将迎来联合检查 10-15号万象和国内联合在特区检查护照和电诈,特区最近是不太安稳,各位还是多注意安全吧。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🫥 一站式东南亚导航:@KK88 ✈️ 免费能量/查U:@hu520 🙂 投稿/商务:@my111
🥰5🎉4❤3👍3🔥3👏1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,247 posts we hold for @DNY3030. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DNY3030 named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 81 posts, 18 October 2026 – 30 October 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【实时】东南亚大事件” (@DNY3030), 175,737 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNY3030.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.