13 measurements spanning 35 days, net +682. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,375–3,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 12:38
3,159
+12
7 Sept 2026, 01:38
3,147
+43
2 Sept 2026, 00:58
3,104
+60
30 Aug 2026, 03:16
3,044
+55
27 Aug 2026, 10:16
2,989
+30
24 Aug 2026, 16:28
2,959
+3
20 Aug 2026, 17:03
2,956
+10
17 Aug 2026, 10:15
2,946
+11
13 Aug 2026, 16:06
2,935
+8
10 Aug 2026, 22:11
2,927
+447
7 Aug 2026, 17:54
2,480
+3
7 Aug 2026, 14:33
2,477
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:19
2,477
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 38s
Average length
1m 19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
67
90.5%
🫡
4
5.41%
👍
2
2.70%
🔥
1
1.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لأن راحتكم ورأيكم هما بوصلتنا الحقيقية اللي بنتحرك بيها، ولأننا دايما بنسمعكم وبنهتم بكل تفصيلة بتشاركونا بيها... ❤️✨
ونظراً للإقبال والتواصل الكبير من عدد كبير من زمايلكم، قررنا ناخد خطوة تضمن إن الكل يكون حاضر ومستفيد:
🔥 تأجيل الميتنج ليوم الجمعة القادم! 🔥
ومش بس كده... هينزل فوت (Poll) جديد قريب جداً، عشان أنتم اللي تختاروا الوقت المثالي والأنسب لكم بالظبط.
خليكم مستعدين، ورتبوا أوقاتكم... اللي جاي أفضل بكتير!…
عشان نجاوب على كل أسئلتكم بخصوص تفاصيل الدفعة الجديدة من الـ PI Fellowship، ونشرح عملياً إزاي هنستفيد من "قواعد البيانات المغلقة" وننقل الريسيرش لمستوى الشغل المؤسسي.. قررنا نعمل ميتنج لايف مفتوح! 🚀
عشان نضمن إن الوقت يكون مناسب للجميع، اختار المعاد ؟
الجمعة بكرة الساعة 537%
الجمعة بكرة الساعة 8:3068%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
إحنا مش ضد الكورسات. بالعكس، أي كورس ممكن يديك معلومة.
لكن البحث العلمي الحقيقي مش بيتبني بالمشاهدة فقط، بتتعلّم لما تطبق، تغلط، تاخد Feedback، وتشتغل بإيدك على Projects حقيقية.
وده بالضبط اللي اتبنى عليه
PI Fellowship Program
و اللى هتلاقي فيه
✔️ Private One-to-One Mentorship
✔️ Multiple Publication Opportunities
✔️ Exclusive Research Community
✔️ Global Seniors Networking
✔️ Paid Research Contracts
✔️ Funded Pu…
السر دايماً في "الشغل المؤسسي" 🏢
الفرق الحقيقي بين إنك تتعلم وتشتغل ريسيرش تحت مظلة شركة معتمدة، وبين إنك تتعلمه بشكل فردي في اي مكان ، بيظهر بوضوح في "الإمكانيات والصلاحيات". العمل المؤسسي بيوفرلك بنية تحتية، تغطية قانونية، وصلاحيات وصول مستحيل تتوفر بمجهود فردي.
وتأكيداً على رؤيتنا في توفير أقوى بيئة بحثية متكاملة، يسعدنا الإعلان عن مفاجأة جديدة:
🔥 New Exclusive Closed Database Added to PI Fellowship! 🔥 ❤💪
نجح…
We are delighted to welcome Dr. Yehia Nabil to NextGen Research Hub.
As our community continues to grow, we remain committed to bringing together passionate professionals who share the same vision of advancing medical research and empowering future researchers.
Welcome to the team, Dr. Yehia. We look forward to the journey ahead.
استمراراً للجهود البحثية المكثفة والمتابعة
المستمرة لخريجي البرامج التدريبية..
تخرج هذه الورقة البحثية للنور لتثبت أن المنهجية القوية (High Methodology) لا ترتبط بالأقدمية. الورقة تجمع باحترافية بين التحليل السريري (Clinical Meta-Analysis) ودقة الاختبارات التشخيصية (DTA).
الإنجاز الاستثنائي هنا هو أن هذا العمل تم تصميمه وتنفيذه بالكامل بأيدي باحثين لم يمر على تخرجهم من البرنامج التدريبي سوى 6 أشهر فقط، وبطبيعة الح…
الريسيرش مش مجرد "أرقام" بنتباهى بيها.. الريسيرش الحقيقي "عقول" بتقود! 🚀
زي ما واضح في الصورة
دي مش مجرد جروبات، دي 12 فكرة بحثية جديدة بدأناهم في 3 أسابيع بس وخلاص بيخلصوا ، بقيادة خريجين الدفعة الأخيرة!
والافكار اللي قبليهم اللي بداناها الشهر اللي فات اترفعوا كلهم
في NextGen مش بنتباهى بإننا تخطينا 230
بحث منشور.
الإنجاز الحقيقي بالنسبة لنا هو:
✅هل الطالب بيعرف يشتغل ويحلل داتا لوحده تماماً؟ ✅هل يقدر يليد (L…
🛑 عايز تخلي بحثك الـ Observational بقوة الـ RCT؟
(السر اللي المجلات الكبيرة بتدور عليه!) 🚀
أكبر مشكلة في الدراسات الرصدية (زي الـ Cohort) هي الـ Confounding factors.. المجموعتين ببساطة مش متكافئين. لو استخدمت الـ Regression العادي، إنت يادوب بتعمل "تعديل إحصائي"، وده كتير بيكون غير مقنع لمجلات الـ Q1.
💡 الحل :
Propensity Score Matching (PSM)
بدل ما تحاول تظبط الأرقام في الآخر، الـ PSM بيخليك تبني مجموعتين متطابقت…
🧠 أكتر سؤالين بيتكرروا على البوت.. وإجابتهم باختصار! 🚀
كتير من الزملاء بيبعتوا يسألونا نقاط مهمة جداً بخصوص الانضمام للـ PI Fellowship، وحابين نجاوب عليهم بكل صراحة ووضوح:
❓ 1. هل الكورس ينفع لطلبة سنة أولى وتانية وتالتة؟
إجابتنا باختصار: ألف مبروك، إنت في المكان الصح!
الكورس بيبدأ معاك من الصفر (الـ Basics) بأسلوب بسيط ومنهجي جداً، لغاية ما يوصلك لمرحلة الاحتراف اللي مش هتحتاج بعدها لأي كورسات تانية.
مش كلام نظر…
مش كل برنامج بيعلمك البحث العلمي او بتنشر في اخره يبقى برنامج مناسب ليك
البرنامج الصح هو اللي بيخليك independent researcher💪
قادر يستغل المهارات بتاعته في تكوين مستقبل مهني ليك وتستغل المهارة دي في الدخل المادي 🤑
ابعت كلمة Wave واستغل خصم المجموعات 😉
@DrbinjNRH_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DRBINJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
عشان نجاوب على كل أسئلتكم بخصوص تفاصيل الدفعة الجديدة من الـ PI Fellowship، ونشرح عملياً إزاي هنستفيد من "قواعد البيانات المغلقة" وننقل الريسيرش لمستوى الشغل المؤسسي.. قررنا نعمل ميتنج لايف مفتوح! 🚀
عشان نضمن إن الوقت يكون مناسب للجميع، اختار المعاد ؟
الجمعة بكرة الساعة 537%
الجمعة بكرة الساعة 8:3068%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NextGen Research Hub (NRH)” (@DRBINJ), 3,159 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DRBINJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.