Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π—§π—›π—˜ 𝗖π—₯π—œπ—•

Channel

π—§π—›π—˜ 𝗖π—₯π—œπ—•

@D_CRIB

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

6,417subscribers

-3,562 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002302917849
TypeChannel
Username@D_CRIB
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/D_CRIB

Growth

6,4179,9798,1987 August 2026 β€” 9,979 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 9,979 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 9,959 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 9,772 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 9,716 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 9,576 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 9,464 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 9,299 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 9,070 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 8,264 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 7,532 subscribers7 September 2026 β€” 6,417 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net -3,562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,883–10,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:386,417-1,115
2 Sept 2026, 12:247,532-732
30 Aug 2026, 05:148,264-806
27 Aug 2026, 00:149,070-229
24 Aug 2026, 00:069,299-165
20 Aug 2026, 07:359,464-112
17 Aug 2026, 09:539,576-140
13 Aug 2026, 09:489,716-56
10 Aug 2026, 17:539,772-187
8 Aug 2026, 02:519,959-20
7 Aug 2026, 15:159,979no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:039,979first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,088 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘28113.5%
πŸŽ‰27513.2%
❀26412.6%
πŸ¦„25412.2%
🀩25312.1%
πŸ”₯24811.9%
😁1969.39%
❀‍πŸ”₯874.17%
πŸ₯°833.98%
πŸ’―773.69%
😍703.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 2,088 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTCβ‰ˆ3,060 views229 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $OnlyMarms This looks kinda funny narra tbh, so aped some. https://x.com/Rainmaker1973/status/2082101341137056215 https://dexscreener.com/solana/6bv1jm1debpeeeovhorajftbmvdkqidc9mxyrqwfgoxz

πŸ¦„76❀30πŸ”₯29πŸ‘27πŸŽ‰25🀩22😁20

20 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTCβ‰ˆ4,090 views124 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $BOWYER Aped this one, i tested the bot it works pretty gucci. Lately, Virtual launches are horrendous but it's kinda low so took my chances. https://github.com/BowyerApp/bowyer 0xaF4C10fEf50059d1e3E8aB1C80E46DB6A76098B4

🀩25😁24πŸŽ‰20❀19πŸ‘19πŸ”₯17

18 Jul 2026, 05:55 UTCβ‰ˆ3,100 views134 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $APPLCAT Just woke up and aped this. Meme + RWA is a narrative I like, and seeing Vlad mention it gave me another reason to take a look. Not an early entry like the usual CRIB gems, it's already had a decent move. Don't chase green candles. DYOR. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4bed05783e5a478cdcf84517f0a19645b26b32d3

πŸ¦„30πŸŽ‰27πŸ‘20❀18🀩16πŸ”₯12😁11

18 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTCβ‰ˆ2,950 views52 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

πŸ‘11🀩10πŸŽ‰9❀8😁8πŸ”₯6

17 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTCβ‰ˆ3,780 views123 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”΅ $TSG APed some, Cobie tweet so hence its pumping. https://dexscreener.com/base/0x5e4c78bf666d78fa1e751abc84cf9933d17b1736d4605f400173ac63ac52b1f8

❀24πŸŽ‰24πŸ‘21😁20🀩19πŸ”₯15

17 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTCβ‰ˆ2,790 views102 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $p0 Grabbed a bag. Solid tech. The only thing holding it back, in my opinion, is the Bags App launch. On a stronger launchpad, this could've had a much bigger send. Either way, I'm bullish on the vision and will be watching this closely. The OS for creators πŸ‘‡ https://x.com/Crypto_Litty/status/2078053547174703418 https://dexscreener.com/solana/i1qcvutpv37h6wnqzq3etac3oye9ksjjs7rxa4j7prp

❀25πŸ‘20😁19πŸŽ‰16🀩12πŸ”₯10

17 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTCβ‰ˆ2,550 views130 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $VANTIS Aped this, launched on Virtual and its like first AI software factory on RH chain. Virtuals launch, so normally they go slowly. So hopefully this will run. https://x.com/vantis_ai/status/2077809652709093794 And the dev is $jtvo dev btw https://x.com/lucaxyzz 0xB6d695d5fbcEbD837f6b9f214c9BeeE8bA90762B https://app.virtuals.io/virtuals/111724

🀩22πŸŽ‰19πŸ”₯19πŸ‘16❀14😁12❀‍πŸ”₯8πŸ’―8

16 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTCβ‰ˆ2,850 views135 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $SOLdiers Aped some in this dip, would love to see a good runner on sol CHAIN. https://dexscreener.com/solana/b4jm2z5daqncjtsfm4f8v5pc88ka8fk3oycswefsq9br

πŸŽ‰26πŸ‘22πŸ”₯19πŸ₯°15❀13πŸ’―9😁9❀‍πŸ”₯8

16 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTCβ‰ˆ2,120 views159 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $Shrek Aped this some here, looks like the main runner for Bow fun launchpad, and since the Noxa situation is really really bad so i am expecting to see runners on other launchpads. Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x493110ced08094d7ba7edb7fa4acbd49d11f8bb5 CA: 0x4cAAfd62303421b8d93c87F1c465F657FF893b03

❀‍πŸ”₯26🀩22πŸ”₯20πŸ₯°19πŸŽ‰17πŸ‘16❀14πŸ’―14

14 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTCβ‰ˆ4,830 views236 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🚨 THE CRIB | EARLY GEM πŸͺ™ $ROBBINGHOOD πŸ“Š Market Cap: $33.2K πŸ’§ Liquidity: $13.6K πŸ“ˆ Volume: $30.1K ⏱️ Age: 13 Minutes ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 Initial Thoughts β€’ Fresh launch β€’ Decent early volume β€’ Worth watching for a trend reversal β€’ micro-cap ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ πŸ“„ Contract Address 6fkhFEPL1KjipJkAuJg6gCQmHsnvwfhJXUyjV2Tspump ⚠️ NFA/DYOR https://dexscreener.com/solana/8y7wwhTi3Y29cgHYKnruBrm231rhq1Z2QdmHbUQEio1V

πŸ¦„88❀26πŸŽ‰20πŸ‘20🀩18πŸ”₯16😁14πŸ₯°13

10 Jul 2026, 22:23 UTCβ‰ˆ3,520 views96 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $DEXBULL Aped this some, been watching since launch thought it might be just some farm but its holding and going pretty well despite of all volume at RH chain rn. So bought some here, as i see Dextools following them and openly supporting too. https://x.com/DEXToolsApp/status/2075152451540295861 6xCtR2Eq1VumsoRdNutcfSQfLMk7xUa2BrMx18tqpump

πŸ¦„20❀15πŸ”₯11❀‍πŸ”₯9πŸ’―8πŸ₯°8😍8πŸ‘7

9 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTCβ‰ˆ2,220 views86 reactionsread 28 August 2026

πŸ”΅ $B420 JUST wokeup and aped this new base token 0xB200000000000000000000231d6C1F1CE455ba32 https://dexscreener.com/base/0x36543216f3e01e4f69c92c043440306196db83f030acedb182bf87f40f3b33df

🀩15πŸ”₯14πŸ‘11❀10πŸŽ‰8❀‍πŸ”₯7πŸ’―7😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @D_CRIB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ—§π—›π—˜ 𝗖π—₯π—œπ—•β€ (@D_CRIB), 6,417 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/D_CRIB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.