Sports โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 75 days, net +222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 30,712โ31,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Oct 2026, 22:07
31,000
-9
27 Oct 2026, 20:07
31,009
+15
26 Oct 2026, 19:20
30,994
+31
25 Oct 2026, 16:59
30,963
-32
24 Oct 2026, 20:19
30,995
-3
23 Oct 2026, 22:10
30,998
-23
22 Oct 2026, 22:49
31,021
+2
21 Oct 2026, 20:11
31,019
-2
20 Oct 2026, 18:51
31,021
+8
19 Oct 2026, 20:00
31,013
+10
18 Oct 2026, 20:27
31,003
+1
17 Oct 2026, 18:29
31,002
+11
16 Oct 2026, 17:20
30,991
-14
15 Oct 2026, 17:44
31,005
+17
14 Oct 2026, 20:27
30,988
-5
13 Oct 2026, 11:35
30,993
-59
9 Oct 2026, 12:17
31,052
+19
5 Oct 2026, 01:22
31,033
-88
27 Sept 2026, 23:57
31,121
+30
17 Sept 2026, 15:37
31,091
first reading
Engagement
300 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
5.72%
avg views รท 31,000 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
119 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
119
of 300 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
300 (9 August 2026 โ 27 October 2026)
Views total
210,934
Reactions total
โ
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Oct 2026, 08:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 16s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
โฝ๏ธ Italy
โ Torino ๐ Como
โ Como to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Italy
โ AS Roma ๐ Cagliari
โ AS Roma to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Italy
โ Sassuolo ๐ Lazio
โ Lazio to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Moldova
โ Dacia Buiucani ๐ Univer Comrat
โ Dacia Buiucani to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Bosnia and Herzegovina
โ Tomislav ๐ FK Sarajevo
โ FK Sarajevo to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Uganda
โ NEC FC ๐ Ntugasโฆ
โฝ๏ธ Spain
โ Sevilla ๐ Osasuna
โ Sevilla to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ France
โ PSG ๐ Lyon
โ Paris SG to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ France
โ Boulogne ๐ Reims
โ Reims to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Portugal
โ Santa Clara ๐ Benfica
โ Benfica to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Singapore
โ Geylang ๐ Hougang
โ Geylang to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Indonesia
โ FC Bhayangkara ๐ PSM Makassar
โ FC Bhayangkara โฆ
I am happy to announce to you that today's four fulltime draws, a ticket I received from my source and posted into the WhatsApp VIP group this morning, won successfully.
It's okay that I may not have 1000+ odds to offer my VIP Members or VIP Games doesn't come daily but trust me, with the four fulltime draws ticket I normally receive and post every weekend [Saturday and Sunday] is enough to make you and I a perfect โฆ
โฝ๏ธ Spain
โ Barcelona ๐ Real Madrid
โ Barcelona to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Italy
โ Udinese ๐ AC Milan
โ AC Milan to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Spain
โ Real Sociedad ๐ Levante
โ Real Sociedad to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Italy
โ Lecce ๐ Juventus
โ Juventus to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ Germany
โ Freiburg ๐ Bayern Munich
โ Bayern Munich to win
=========================
โฝ๏ธ England
โ Sunderland ๐ Leโฆ
I HAVE POSTED THE EIGHTH FULLTIME DRAWS TICKET FOR THIS MONTH INTO THE WHATSAPP VIP GROUP CHAT.
The odds are [ 4.87, 4.65, 4.65 & 4.30 ] Respectively, but when accumulated in single ticket , itโs [ 452.80 ] Odds which is very much available in all online betting site worldwide.
I will advise you not to give up due to your past experience with those fake tipster on telegram but instead of that , subscribe to my Whatโฆ
๐ฅI HAVE RECEIVED THE EIGHTH FULLTIME DRAWS TICKET FOR THIS MONTH, FROM MY SOURCE.
โป๏ธTIPS: Four Accurate Fulltime Draw Matches.
โป๏ธACCURACY: 100% Safe , Stake High โ
โป๏ธHOW TO GET THE TICKET: Make payment for the WhatsApp VIP Group subscription and the fulltime draws ticket, Because that's where I will post today's ticket & all ticket for this month.
Message me now to get Today's fulltime draws ticket.
@DailyAccuraโฆ
Good morning & Happy new week everyone, be awesome today๐ฝ
๐ Beautiful New Day๐คด๐ Top Subscribers of Daily Accurate Tips channel
Remember that โEvery great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the worldโ
๐๐See yourself as being successful with every interaction that you will participate in, as it will give you thโฆ
Signed Engr Emmanuel
Showing the 12 most recent of 300 posts we hold for @DailySureFreeTips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@DailySureFreeTips edited 8 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 October 2026
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DailySureFreeTips named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@footballfreebet899 named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 โ 19 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 12 October 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@footballfreebet6321 named in 1 post, 29 September 2026 โ 29 September 2026 ยท confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฌ โจโ (@DailySureFreeTips), 31,000 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DailySureFreeTips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.