The descending resistance on $INJ has broken, target $8.30 now in play.
❤8

Channel
@DamiDefiinsider
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,615subscribers
-485 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001633439254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DamiDefiinsider |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DamiDefiinsider |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:14 | 9,615 | -16 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:11 | 9,631 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 9,643 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 9,661 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 9,677 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 9,686 | -15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 9,701 | -15 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 9,716 | -29 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 9,745 | -38 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 9,783 | -63 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 9,846 | -25 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 9,871 | -24 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 9,895 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:28 | 9,939 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 9,958 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 9,975 | -21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 9,996 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 10,012 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 10,020 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 10,024 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (27 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,272 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
339 reactions across 46 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 243 | 71.7% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 12.1% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.885% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.295% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The descending resistance on $INJ has broken, target $8.30 now in play.
❤8
$BTC has bounced from the 200-day EMA into the $80K–$81K area I was watching. Turn on your notis 🔔
❤5
$INJ has bounced from rising support near $6.85 and is testing the descending trendline around $7.60 on the 4H chart. What stands out to me is where the last two rallies stopped, first near $9.20, then near $8.20. I’m still waiting for a close above the line. If buyers get that close and hold the trendline on a pullback, I’d watch $8.00–$8.20 first. A 4H close below that support would weaken the case for another …
❤6
$BTC is testing the daily EMA200 around $76,464, alongside horizontal support roughly between $75.5K and $76.5K. I see a potential bounce attempt here because this area also supported price during the August and September consolidation. I’m watching whether buyers can defend this area and reclaim $78K–$78.5K. That would improve the short-term picture and bring $80K–$81K back into focus, although the sequence of lo…
❤6
Ten catalysts hit the crypto calendar this week, led by the US midterm elections on Nov 3, Zcash’s NU7 upgrade around Nov 5 and the jobs report on Nov 6. Crypto watchlist for November 2-8: $NEAR: HSP-029 Vote to Cut Max Issuance from 2.5% to 1.6% | Nov 2 $AKT: Governance Vote on Migration to Solana | Nov 2 $TRX: Committee Proposal 108 Activation | Nov 2 $BTC: US Midterm Elections | Nov 3 $XLM: Protocol 30 Testnet V…
👍4❤2
🚨 New Wealth Vault is live On Tuesday I posted $HYPE right here at $78. I gave you three levels: $82, then $88, then $94 to $96. All three hit in under three days. HYPE topped out near $96.70. That's +24%. The day after my post, the company that owns the New York Stock Exchange announced it's bringing Hyperliquid's tech to US markets. Now the real question: what do we do from here? In this edition: 🔹 Why HYPE …
❤3
$HYPE has followed through on the reversal setup I posted on October 27. I was watching whether the $75–$77 support zone could hold and produce a clear daily break above the descending trendline. That support held, price broke the downtrend, and the move has now cleared both $82–$83 and $88. The previous daily candle also wicked through my $94–$96 target zone toward $97, so all three areas from the original post h…
❤1
$HYPE is compressing above the $75–$77 support zone on the daily chart, also a descending trendline I see a potential reversal attempt here because this zone aligns with the old June highs and the base of Septembers mini pump. I’m still waiting for a clear daily close above the descending trendline. The MACD is becoming less negative, which could mean selling momentum is easing, although a bullish crossover has no…
❤4🔥2
New Wealth Vault edition is live 🤝 Three weeks ago I gave you 5 coins for Q4, each with a buy zone and a level that proves me wrong. This month's pullback delivered those buy zones. 🟢 HYPE: in the buy zone at $79.92 🟢 TAO: in the buy zone at $273.76 🟢 AAVE: hit our $179 target first, now back in the buy zone at $152.91 None of the 5 have hit their invalidation level. And the coins I said NOT to add? Every one fe…
❤3👍2
10 crypto catalysts land this week, and $SOL’s biggest upgrade ever is one of them. Monday opens with CME futures going live for $BCH and $UNI Crypto watchlist for the week of October 19: https://x.com/DamiDefi/status/2112098545763524731?s=20
❤5
$ETH is testing the $2,380–$2,400 support band on the daily chart after pulling back from roughly $2,800. I’m watching this as a potential rebound from the same base that supported the August and September consolidation. My first upside checkpoint is $2,500, followed by the drawn resistance near $2,550. A daily close above $2,550 and a subsequent hold would strengthen the case for a return toward $2,780–$2,800. C…
🔥5❤1
$ICP is pulling back toward rising support on the 4H chart Price is around $3.10, with the trendline currently near $3.00. I expect a rebound toward $3.25 if buyers defend that support. Target 1: $3.25 Target 2: $3.40 Target 3: $3.56–$3.60 Invalidation: A 4H close below rising support, currently around $3.00. Watch for a rejection wick near $3.00 followed by a bullish 4H close. A reclaim and hold of $3.25 would …
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @DamiDefiinsider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Defi Insider by DamiDefi 🔭” (@DamiDefiinsider), 9,615 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DamiDefiinsider.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.