Channel
@DanielShabrokh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,346subscribers
-904 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001737152441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DanielShabrokh |
| Description | Seeing patterns others overlook. For better decisions in an uncertain world. JD & PhD — Australia 📷 instagram.com/danielshabrokh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DanielShabrokh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 39,346 | -163 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 39,509 | -49 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 39,558 | -47 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 39,605 | -45 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 39,650 | -44 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 39,694 | -47 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 39,741 | -62 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 39,803 | -53 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 39,856 | -43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 39,899 | -57 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 39,956 | -35 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 39,991 | -84 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 40,075 | -92 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 40,167 | -62 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 40,229 | -21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 40,250 | first reading |
116 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 116 (17 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 116,198 |
| Reactions total | 2,565 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 00:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,565 reactions across 116 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,019 | 78.7% | |
| 👍 | 257 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 107 | 4.17% | |
| 👌 | 73 | 2.85% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 1.09% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 0.936% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 0.468% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 0.351% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 0.312% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 0.273% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 0.273% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.195% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.117% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.078% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.078% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.039% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.039% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اگر هدفت واقعاً برات مهمه، اجازه نده حواسپرتیهای کوچک، آیندهی بزرگت رو خراب کنن. هر چیزی که تو رو از هدفت دور میکنه، ارزش زمان و انرژی تو رو نداره. تمرکزت رو حفظ کن، آرام پیش برو و به جای اینکه هر روز دنبال نتیجه باشی، هر روز دنبال پیشرفت باش. نتیجه خودش در زمان درست از راه میرسه. 🎯🍀
❤23🔥1
آدمها بیشتر از حرفهات، مرزهات رو جدی میگیرن.
❤10👍1👏1
▪️ بدترین مقایسه این نیست که خودت رو با یک آدم موفق مقایسه کنی. بدترش اینه که خودت رو با یک نسخه خیالی از خودت مقایسه کنی. “ اگر اون موقع شروع کرده بودم…” “ اگر فلان تصمیم رو گرفته بودم…” “ اگر فلان فرصت رو از دست نمیدادم…” این فکرها گذشته رو تغییر نمیدن،فقط انرژی امروزت رو میگیرن. گذشته دیگه سرمایهگذاری قابل برگشت نیست.اما امروز هنوز سرمایهی توئه. پولت رو که از دست بدی شاید دوباره بسازیش،اما زمانت رو نه.
❤18💯3
“ دیگه دیر شده. “ یکی از خطرناکترین جملههاست. ۲۵ سالته؟ میگی کاش ۲۰ سالگی شروع میکردم. ۳۰ سالته؟ میگی کاش ۲۵ سالگی شروع میکردم. ۴۰ سالته؟ میگی کاش ۳۰ سالگی شروع میکردم. و این داستان میتونه تا آخر عمر ادامه پیدا کنه. یک روز متوجه میشی: سن تو مشکل اصلی نبود،این بود که هر روز شروع کردن رو عقب انداختی. بهترین زمان شروع شاید گذشته باشه. اما دومین زمان خوب؟ “ همین امروز “
❤20
🔸قرار نیست همیشه باهوشترین آدم اتاق باشی،قرار نیست همیشه خوششانس باشی،قرار نیست همیشه انگیزه داشته باشی. اما میتونی کسی باشی که: زودتر یاد میگیره،اشتباهش رو میپذیره، از شکست فرار نمیکنه،پولش رو مدیریت میکنه،و وقتی چیزی رو شروع کرد،قبل از نتیجه گرفتن رهاش نمیکنه. برتری واقعی همیشه در استعداد نیست،گاهی در دوام اوردنه،خیلیها میتونستن موفق بشن… فقط زودتر از زمانی که قرار بود نتیجه بگیرن،تسلیم شدن.
❤12
وقتی شهریور از نیمه گذشت باید کمکم به پاییز خوش آمد گفت ... روزتون بخیر✨🍃
❤16
🔹اعتماد به نفس با صبح تا شب گفتن من خوب و دوست داشتنی و قویم ساخته نمیشه،اعتماد به نفس اینجوری ساخته میشه که بری یه کار درستی رو واقعا انجام بدی.
❤15
بعضیها دنبال پولن بعضیها دنبال جایگاهی که پول به سمتش حرکت میکنه.
❤14
پولی که برای تحتتأثیر قرار دادن دیگران خرج میکنی، معمولاً تو رو فقیرتر و اونها رو فقط چند دقیقه سرگرم میکنه.
❤21👍4
▪️مغز انسان برای ثروتمند شدن ساخته نشده،برای زنده ماندن ساخته شده. برای همین معمولاً: سود سریع رو دوست داریم،از ضرر میترسیم،پاداش فوری رو به نتیجهی دیرتر ترجیح میدیم،چیزهایی که الان داریم رو بیشتر از فرصتهای آینده ارزشگذاری میکنیم. مشکل اینجاست که ثروت معمولاً برعکس این رفتارها ساخته میشه. پس گاهی برای پیشرفت مالی،لازم نیست فقط پول بیشتری یاد بگیری. باید خودت و خطاهای ذهن خودت رو بشناسی. هوش مالی بدون شناخت روا…
❤11👍3
🔸یکی از مهارتهای مالی که کمتر دربارهاش حرف میزنن: نه گفتن نه به خریدی که لازم نداری،نه به معاملهای که نمیفهمی،نه به شراکتی که بهش اعتماد نداری،نه به کاری که فقط به خاطر پول میخوای انجام بدی،نه به سبک زندگیای که توان پرداختش رو نداری. هر “نه” درست، میتونه از یک ضرر بزرگ جلوگیری کنه. گاهی ثروتمند شدن با “بیشتر به دست آوردن” شروع نمیشه، با کمتر از دست دادن شروع میشه.
❤10👏3
🔹اگر تمام زندگی مالیات به یک منبع درآمد وابسته باشه،آسیبپذیری. نه به این معنی که باید همزمان ۵ شغل داشته باشی،اتفاقاً برعکس. اول یک مهارت اصلی بساز،درآمد اصلیات رو قوی کن.بعد به مرور، راههای دیگری برای درآمد ایجاد کن. هدف این نیست که همیشه بیشتر کار کنی. هدف اینه که کمکم وابستگی مالی ات به یک نقطه کمتر بشه. امنیت مالی یعنی وقتی یک در بسته شد،تمام مسیر زندگیات بسته نشه.
❤8👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @DanielShabrokh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daniel Shabrokh ” (@DanielShabrokh), 39,346 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DanielShabrokh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.