Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Daniil Bógdan

Channel

Daniil Bógdan

@DaniilBogdanFilm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,094subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003699484650
TypeChannel
Username@DaniilBogdanFilm
Created13 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DaniilBogdanFilm

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0821,0961,0895 August 2026 — 1,082 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,082 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,084 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,086 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,087 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,094 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,096 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,093 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,085 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,094 subscribers1,0945 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,080–1,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 21:191,094+9
12 Sept 2026, 13:391,085-8
3 Sept 2026, 09:231,093-3
30 Aug 2026, 22:341,096+2
27 Aug 2026, 22:091,094+7
25 Aug 2026, 03:561,087+4
22 Aug 2026, 04:251,083-2
18 Aug 2026, 12:441,085-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:061,086+2
12 Aug 2026, 18:231,084+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:021,083+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:221,082no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:181,082first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 13 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3,293 reactions across 10 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏88726.9%
🔥76323.2%
💯58417.7%
👍55716.9%
3009.11%
😁431.31%
😢220.668%
🤡220.668%
😱190.577%
👎180.547%
😭140.425%
130.395%
🤔90.273%
💊80.243%
❤‍🔥70.213%
💩60.182%
🏆40.121%
👀40.121%
🍾30.091%
🥰30.091%
5 further kinds70.213%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DaniilBogdanFilm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC417 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Монополия ИИ В сети развернулся спор вокруг ИИ-клипа на песню «Монополия». Такого рода хейт вокруг нейронок – дело нередкое, когда какой-то автор или крупный бренд впервые их используют и оказываются непонятыми своей аудиторией, так что это интересно разобрать. Во-первых, от авторов, сформировавших свою фанатскую базу традиционно созданным контентом, ожидают того же и впредь. Люди могут с удовольствием смотреть раб

10👍8💯8🌚1

13 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,350 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Прилипучая песенка из ролика про блокировку Telegram, многие просили поделиться 🎶

🔥37👍10🏆4😁4🥰2

2 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC≈80,300 views510 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Мы все эти годы гордились тем, что в России лучшие цифровые сервисы — на голову выше европейских — и у нас лучшие IT-специалисты, чьи продукты превосходили западные аналоги. Телеграм придумал русский, и им пользуется миллиард человек по всему миру. Он стал незаменим как независимая защищенная информационная площадка, позволяющая свободно общаться и самореализовываться. И это очередное доказательство того, что наши лю

💯313🔥100👍4519😁13🤡6💩5🍾3

9 Apr 2026, 09:20 UTC≈8,100 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Земля, которую мы любим Все, наверное, видели фотографии Земли, недавно опубликованные NASA. Последний раз человек фотографировал её целиком в 1972 году – с миссии «Аполлон-17». Наша планета существует примерно 4,5 миллиарда лет, и её существование в том виде, в каком мы её знаем – результат цепочки совпадений, вероятность которой настолько мала, что её можно считать нулевой. По сути – это чудо. По ряду оценок вер

👍25😱188🔥4👎2🥱2

7 Apr 2026, 08:32 UTC≈9,370 views63 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как общаться с ИИ Несколько наблюдений и советов из практики 1. Нейросети ленивы По ощущениям, они заточены на то, чтобы дать минимально необходимое для ответа. Даже если текст получается объёмным, эта экономия всё равно сказывается на качестве. На ответ выделена ограниченная порция энергии, и чем крупнее задача, тем сильнее модель размазывает её – примерно как кубик масла по большому куску хлеба. Поэтому крупную з

👍3413🔥95❤‍🔥2

31 Mar 2026, 08:27 UTC≈8,620 views71 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Выбор текстовых нейросетей Я перепробовал почти все популярные языковые модели на платных подписках, по итогу выбрал две для повседневной работы. Claude от Anthropic – основная модель, после него сложно возвращаться на что-то другое. Достоинства: минимализм в ответах, у модели нет задачи нагрузить тебя тонной ненужной инфы. Не общается с тобой как отсталым, почти не лизоблюдничает, не заточен на поддержание прокра

👍519❤‍🔥5🔥4🤔1🤡1

24 Mar 2026, 17:46 UTC≈12,900 views535 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как создавался ролик «Можно, а зачем?» Забегая вперед, сразу скажу: новый ролик уже в работе, так что буду рад, если поддержите подпиской здесь в Telegram и на YouTube. Итак, работа над этим клипом заняла около двух месяцев, в процессе было сгенерировано более 6 тысяч изображений и свыше 2 тысяч видео. Потенциальных героев оказалось значительно больше, чем можно уместить в одном ролике, поэтому выбор строился по пр

👍287125🔥83👏35👌1👎1💩1🤡1

23 Mar 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,210,000 views1,657 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

«Можно, а зачем?» – слова топ-менеджера АвтоВАЗа, ставшие мемом. Но что, если бы этот вопрос в своё время задавали те, кем мы до сих пор гордимся? Те, кто покорял космос, укрощал атом и строил передовые самолёты? YouTube [4K]

👏852🔥469💯134102👍36😢22👎13🤡13

22 Mar 2026, 07:33 UTC≈11,900 views182 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Заблокировать нельзя догнать И запятую здесь, к сожалению, ставим не мы с вами. Минцифры подготовило законопроект о "трансграничных технологиях ИИ". Если коротко – правовая база для блокировки иностранных моделей. Официальный старт с 2027 года. Цель, думаю, очевидна – расчистить рынок для YandexGPT и GigaChat. Чтобы понять, очень условно и примерно, ориентируясь на ИИ-бенчмарки, где находятся Яндекс и GigaChat в м

💯127👍24😭146👀4😁3🤔2🤡1

19 Mar 2026, 13:10 UTC≈8,760 views132 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Первый пост Никогда не показывайте на оценку ИИ ваши авторские тексты, максимум – проверка на грамматические ошибки. Иначе он сведет вас с ума, особенно если у вас есть склонности к перфекционизму. Даже первоначально здравые замечания, непременно скатятся в бесконечный поток правок и противоречий. В финале вас ждет максимально безликий текст и эмоциональное истощение) В общем, здесь я буду писать про кино и ИИ,

🔥57👍37😁1916💯2🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @DaniilBogdanFilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Daniil Bógdan” (@DaniilBogdanFilm), 1,094 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DaniilBogdanFilm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.