Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 37 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 489–495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 17:58
490
-2
10 Sept 2026, 17:41
492
-1
26 Aug 2026, 14:56
493
-1
12 Aug 2026, 12:25
494
no change
12 Aug 2026, 11:47
494
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32m 02s
Average length
2m 17s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
27
52.9%
❤
7
13.7%
🤔
4
7.84%
🤣
3
5.88%
🤬
3
5.88%
⚡
1
1.96%
🌭
1
1.96%
👎
1
1.96%
👏
1
1.96%
🔥
1
1.96%
🖕
1
1.96%
🥰
1
1.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2023 to 20 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😎🇺🇸🌻Our beautiful Lady Melania showing how she use Medicinal Garden Kit in her garden. She grows her flowers using this seeds from the Medicinal Garden Kit, they are highly powerful and clinically proven with healthy benefits for the flowers.🪴
Get your seeds here
MedicalGardenKitOfficial for fresh and beautiful look for your garden like in fairytale 🧚🌸
More evidence that humanity had a reset in the early new century of 1900...
Join
👇🏻👇🏻
@DarkNet_SecretRevealed
Follow our backup channel 👇
https://t.me/+unaF8VMk4jMzZjdk
The Plants That Will Disappear First in a Crisis
In a crisis, people will turn to plants once again for both food and medicine.
And there are some plants that will vanish faster than all others.
So the only way to make sure you have them when you need them is to grow them in your own backyard.
CLICK👉The Plants That Will Disappear First in a Crisis
I’ve gathered all the seeds for growing these plants and placed t…
Imagine this - posted in 1896 and we're paying for power in 2023.. Tesla is rolling in his grave.
Free energy has been suppressed because it would create freedom for all humanity.
Share ‼️
Join
👇🏻👇🏻
@DarkNet_SecretRevealed
Follow our backup channel 👇
https://t.me/+unaF8VMk4jMzZjdk
It was all a plan to chip the population so they can be tracked with 5G,then exterminated for the global depopulation agenda.
Share ‼️
Join
👇🏻👇🏻
@DarkNet_SecretRevealed
Follow our backup channel 👇
https://t.me/+unaF8VMk4jMzZjdk
💥BQQQQQQQM💥HOW DISINFORMATION WORKS! - It was 1946 and this lost educational film on despotism was required curriculum at every high school in America. The associated test on 11 pages quizzed students on the concepts. By 1967, this film was removed from all libraries. If this isn't brainwashing the youth to blindly obey without a question, I don't know what is - THOUGHTS? 🍿🇺🇸 SHARE!!
Join
👇🏻👇🏻
@DarkNet_SecretReveal…
‼️EXPOSING MILITARY CORRUPTION‼️
It was all planned!
TREASON
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
‼️SHARE SHARE SHARE‼️
Join
👇🏻👇🏻
@DarkNet_SecretRevealed
Follow our backup channel 👇
https://t.me/+unaF8VMk4jMzZjdk
What's wrong with your right eye? Second 3 👀
Share ‼️
Join
👇🏻👇🏻
@DarkNet_SecretRevealed
Follow our backup channel 👇
https://t.me/+unaF8VMk4jMzZjdk
🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DarkNet_SecretRevealed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Darknet - All SECRET REVEALED” (@DarkNet_SecretRevealed), 490 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DarkNet_SecretRevealed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.