Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dâroul Qur'ân Wal Hadîth

Channel

Dâroul Qur'ân Wal Hadîth

@Daroul_Quran_Wal_Hadith

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,147subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001427837297
TypeChannel
Username@Daroul_Quran_Wal_Hadith
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Daroul_Quran_Wal_Hadith

Growth

1,1471,1511,1495 September 2026 — 1,151 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,151 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,150 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,148 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,147 subscribers5 September 202619 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,146–1,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:151,147-1
15 Sept 2026, 07:551,148-2
7 Sept 2026, 19:211,150-1
5 Sept 2026, 13:221,151no change
5 Sept 2026, 12:471,151first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.01%
avg views ÷ 1,147 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held20 (21 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total69
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC32 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @Dourous_Salih_Idi_NjikamVoice message

Fichier audio de انجيفنجو محمد نورالدين

1 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC37 viewsread 5 September 2026

🎙️ *CONSEILS ADRESSÉS À CERTAINS FRÈRES SALAFIS D'ALGÉRIE* 🗣️ Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdillah Bâ Mūssa _(discipline du Sheikh Mouqbil et grand savant du Yemen)_ 📌 *Sujet* : ⚔️ Les guerres de leadership entre certains prédicateurs salafis. 📅 *Date de publication de l’audio original sur YouTube* : 🌙 16 Rabīʿ al-Awwal 1448 H (30 août 2026) 🎧 L’audio original en langue arabe ainsi que son lien YouTube accompagnent cette…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC122 viewsread 5 September 2026
File

Document de انجيفنجو محمد نورالدين

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC123 viewsread 5 September 2026

- Le fait de se baser sur sa propre compréhension dans ce domaine sans revenir aux grands savants profondément enracinés dans la science, tout en *appliquant les paroles des salafs aux situations concrètes de façon erronée*. - Une mauvaise compréhension de la manière d'appliquer les règles de la religion aux personnes. - Le fait de *s'attacher aveuglément à des opinions ou à des personnes, au lieu de suivre la v…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC89 viewsread 5 September 2026

*-Cheikh Rabî‘ ibn Hâdî Al-Madkhalî,* qui est l’un de ceux qui ont le plus écrit et parlé pour exposer les erreurs des Hadâdiyya et réfuter leurs ambiguïtés. *-Cheikh ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Abd Allah Al-Jâbirî*, qui a également Prononcé de nombreuses paroles et leçons sur ce sujet. *-Cheikh Muhammad ibn Hâdî Al-Madkhalî*, à travers des cours et des conférences, il explique l’exagération dans la pratique du tabdî‘ (le fait de d…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC53 viewsread 5 September 2026

L’un des plus graves dangers qu'ils représentent est le fait qu'ils se revendiquent de la salafiyya, utilisent les paroles des imams salafs et affichent leur attachement au Coran et à la Sunna selon la compréhension des pieux prédécesseurs. En réalité, ils s’écartent de cette voie. C’est pourquoi les savants contemporains de la Sunna les ont réfutés et ont expliqué qu’ils étaient tombés dans l’exagération dans leur a…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC45 viewsread 5 September 2026

*Le Haddâdisme : un mal et une source de discorde* ✍️ Écrit par : Le noble sheikh: Pr Abdessalâm Ibn Sâlim As-Souhaymî: _Professeur de droit islamique (fiqh) à la Faculté de la Charia de l'Université islamique de Médine et enseignant à la Mosquée du Prophète ﷺ_ _(Qu'Allah lui pardonne ainsi qu'à ses parents et à tous les musulmans)_ *Introduction* Au nom d'Allah, le Tout Miséricordieux, le Très Miséricordieux Le…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC37 viewsread 5 September 2026

- Le fait de se baser sur sa propre compréhension dans ce domaine sans revenir aux grands savants profondément enracinés dans la science, tout en *appliquant les paroles des salafs aux situations concrètes de façon erronée*. - Une mauvaise compréhension de la manière d'appliquer les règles de la religion aux personnes. - Le fait de *s'attacher aveuglément à des opinions ou à des personnes, au lieu de suivre la v…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC53 viewsread 5 September 2026

*-Cheikh Rabî‘ ibn Hâdî Al-Madkhalî,* qui est l’un de ceux qui ont le plus écrit et parlé pour exposer les erreurs des Hadâdiyya et réfuter leurs ambiguïtés. *-Cheikh ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Abd Allah Al-Jâbirî*, qui a également Prononcé de nombreuses paroles et leçons sur ce sujet. *-Cheikh Muhammad ibn Hâdî Al-Madkhalî*, à travers des cours et des conférences, il explique l’exagération dans la pratique du tabdî‘ (le fait de d…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC35 viewsread 5 September 2026

L’un des plus graves dangers qu'ils représentent est le fait qu'ils se revendiquent de la salafiyya, utilisent les paroles des imams salafs et affichent leur attachement au Coran et à la Sunna selon la compréhension des pieux prédécesseurs. En réalité, ils s’écartent de cette voie. C’est pourquoi les savants contemporains de la Sunna les ont réfutés et ont expliqué qu’ils étaient tombés dans l’exagération dans leur a…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC35 viewsread 5 September 2026

*Le Haddâdisme : un mal et une source de discorde* ✍️ Écrit par : Le noble sheikh: Pr Abdessalâm Ibn Sâlim As-Souhaymî: _Professeur de droit islamique (fiqh) à la Faculté de la Charia de l'Université islamique de Médine et enseignant à la Mosquée du Prophète ﷺ_ _(Qu'Allah lui pardonne ainsi qu'à ses parents et à tous les musulmans)_ *Introduction* Au nom d'Allah, le Tout Miséricordieux, le Très Miséricordieux Le…

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC35 viewsread 5 September 2026

- Le fait de se baser sur sa propre compréhension dans ce domaine sans revenir aux grands savants profondément enracinés dans la science, tout en *appliquant les paroles des salafs aux situations concrètes de façon erronée*. - Une mauvaise compréhension de la manière d'appliquer les règles de la religion aux personnes. - Le fait de *s'attacher aveuglément à des opinions ou à des personnes, au lieu de suivre la v…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Daroul_Quran_Wal_Hadith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تعلم اللغة الفرنسية
@learnfrench2 · 32,198
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dâroul Qur'ân Wal Hadîth” (@Daroul_Quran_Wal_Hadith), 1,147 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Daroul_Quran_Wal_Hadith.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.