То ли угроза, то ли комплимент. Сразу не понять 😂
😁7🤣3

Channel
@DavidSSarkisyan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
631subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001604381395 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DavidSSarkisyan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DavidSSarkisyan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 631 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 643 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:31 | 646 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 June 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 173 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
242 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 137 | 56.6% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 18.6% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 6.61% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 6.20% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 4.96% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.89% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.826% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.826% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.413% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.413% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.413% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DavidSSarkisyan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
То ли угроза, то ли комплимент. Сразу не понять 😂
😁7🤣3
Новый психологический разбор Менталиста готов🔥 Пришлось его перемонтировать практически с нуля. "Это вы убили свою дочь?" — Как Менталист читает людей. Психологический разбор 👇 🌐 Смотреть разбор
❤4🔥4
Собирался еще 2 дня назад выложить новый разбор из менталиста, но Youtube решил заблочить ролик по авторским правам. И сколько я не пытался изменить очередность кадров, чтобы обойти ограничения и Contect ID, это машина не так глупа :) Придется пересобирать ролик почти заново. На это уйдет еще какое-то время. Да, кстати, вижу ваши комменты и реакции на Youtube. Всем спасибо 🔥
🔥8❤1
Наконец вышел из запоя. Шучу, я не пью ) Работы в последнее время стало ещё больше, проекты слегка усложнились. Но успешно довели до результата два из них. Поэтому скоро вернусь с новой порцией интересного контента 🔥 Да, кстати, обновили сайт и сделали его наконец понятным (во всяком случае на эту надеюсь). Если найдите что не работает - дайте знать. Буду признателен ❤️ https://davidsarkisyan.com/
🔥9❤3
Вот кто придумал Газлайтинг 😂 https://youtube.com/shorts/6pLknnq3dEo?feature=share
😁5👍1💯1🔥1
Мастерство управления комплексами. Метод менталиста 🌐 Смотреть разбор
🔥9❤2💯2
Вам это точно понравится 😉 🌐 Смотреть разбор
🔥7❤2💯1
Чьими мыслями ты на самом деле думаешь? Голос человека лишь озвучивает мысли человека, а мысли его зависят от лидеров его группы, которым он верит, а также от людей, которые умеют манипулировать общественным мнением. Эдвард Бернейс, «Пропаганда» (вырезка из книги) Другими словами, то, во что вы верите, или думаете, что правильно — когда-то кем-то было сказано или сделано. И вот главный вопрос, который отсюда вытек…
🔥7❤2👌1
Человеку, который пришёл узнать результаты анализов, могут сказать: «Не переживайте, 90% пациентов с таким диагнозом выздоравливают, и дальше у них всё хорошо». А могут сказать иначе «Вероятность худшего варианта у вас всего 10%». Смысл один и тот же. Но рамка восприятия совсем другая. В первом случае внимание человека направляют на шанс, восстановление и благоприятный исход. Во втором акцент идет на угрозу, риск …
🔥9❤2👏1
Продавец →Консультант → Менеджер → Продаван → Предприниматель → Мошенник Слова вроде бы рядом, но оттенок у каждого совершенно разный. И именно этот оттенок и ярлык влияют на отношение к человеку, профессии или предложению. 👉 Темы разбора: — почему слово «продавец» часто воспринимается негативно; — чем отличается продавец от «продавана» в восприятии людей; — почему каждый из нас в определённом контексте что-то прод…
❤7🔥2🤝1
🔥 Переговоры с клиентом на тему «Я подумаю» ( Аудиоразбор ) В комментариях спросили, можно ли возражение “мы подумаем” отработать через каскадную методику. Конечно, но продуктивнее сначала понять, что на самом деле стоит за этой фразой. Потому что “я подумаю” может означать что угодно: сомнение в цене, недоверие к менеджеру, отсутствие ценности, желание сравнить с другим решением, реальную паузу на анализ или мягки…
🔥7👍4👏2❤1💯1
Разбор #4. Мастерство холодных звонков в B2B-продажах. Темы разбора: — почему перед звонком важно разогнать своё состояние; — как выиграть первые секунды внимания клиента; — зачем в холодном звонке нужен лёгкий разрыв шаблона; — почему время разговора снижает сопротивление клиента; — как понять, что клиент стал мягче по тону голоса; — почему важно спрашивать, что клиенту важно при выборе подрядчика; — как не решать …
🔥7❤3👍3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DavidSSarkisyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Давид Саркисян” (@DavidSSarkisyan), 631 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DavidSSarkisyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.