Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
38,900 average views per post against 8,931 subscribers — an engagement rate of 435.6%. Across the 1,118 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,470–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 12.8% and 36.4%, with a median of 22.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
8 of 8 published in the window (0 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
311,200
Mature posts only
435.6% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,597–8,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 10:01
8,931
-12
1 Nov 2026, 02:08
8,943
+271
28 Oct 2026, 18:39
8,672
+23
25 Oct 2026, 13:35
8,649
+7
22 Oct 2026, 14:54
8,642
-7
19 Oct 2026, 02:50
8,649
-3
16 Oct 2026, 07:05
8,652
-4
13 Oct 2026, 15:37
8,656
-16
7 Oct 2026, 08:20
8,672
-11
30 Sept 2026, 04:36
8,683
-26
15 Sept 2026, 19:59
8,709
+65
12 Sept 2026, 02:01
8,644
-19
7 Sept 2026, 21:59
8,663
-10
2 Sept 2026, 22:06
8,673
-12
31 Aug 2026, 01:23
8,685
-13
28 Aug 2026, 05:17
8,698
-8
25 Aug 2026, 14:17
8,706
-11
22 Aug 2026, 05:29
8,717
-14
18 Aug 2026, 19:36
8,731
-10
15 Aug 2026, 17:38
8,741
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
460.8%
avg views ÷ 8,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
41,200
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
29 (2 August 2025 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
329,200
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 22:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
124
Videos
38
Links
20
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
41s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Останній, четвертий літак приземлився в Гомелі (Білорусь). Уже за кілька годин усі громадяни України, евакуйовані з Олешок, разом з українською делегацією будуть на території України.
Українська делегація разом з евакуйованими мешканцями Олешок вирушила до Анапи. Звідти вони вилетять літаками до Білорусі, а далі автобусами дістануться додому.
Українська делегація уже безпечно дісталась до Олешків. Розпочалась евакуація і роздача гуманітарної допомоги. Режим тиші продовжується. Подробиці згодом.
Делегація з представників України, США та РФ дісталася до пункту, з якого завтра буде доставлятися допомога в Олешки.
На місці присутні представники ЗМІ трьох країн для забезпечення максимально прозорого проведення чергового етапу гуманітарної місії.
Українська делегація на чолі з омбудсменом Дмитром Лубінцем сьогодні виїхала в напрямку Олешки.
Будемо спостерігати і повідомляти про хід операції, щойно з'являтиметься зв'язок.
Бережіть себе, хлопці. 🇺🇦
В рамках ініціативи Першої Леді США Меланії Трамп по розблокуванню Олешок, сьогодні о 3:00 годині за київським часом розпочався наймасштабніший режим тиші на найбільшій ділянці фронту на півдні України.
Це найбільша деескалація з 2022 року.
Режим тиші триватиме з 27 жовтня до 22:59 години 1 листопада.
Кожне подібне деескалаційне зусилля наближає довгоочікуваний мир в Україні.
Найближчим часом розпочнеться операція з деблокування населеного пункту Олешки та його околиць.
Її метою є створення постійно діючих гуманітарних коридорів для безпечної евакуації цивільних людей і доставки допомоги.
Для досягнення цієї мети в найближчий час буде досягнуто режиму припинення вогню, про що повідомила перша леді США Меланія Трамп.
Це був тривалий процес, у якому взяли участь багато людей на різних …
До Верховної Ради надійшло подання Президента про звільнення Генерального прокурора Кравченка.
Протягом найближчих годин документ буде розглянутий на засіданні профільного комітету, після чого завтра його буде винесено на розгляд у сесійній залі парламенту.
Фракція зустрілася з Андрієм Сибігою та Євгенієм Хмарою.
Внесення кандидатів Міністра оборони та Міністра закордонних справ України - це виключна компетенція Президента України. Фракція підтримує Володимира Зеленського і запропонованих ним кандидатів.
Андрій Сибіга - досвідчений дипломат, потужний член команди, якого ми всі добре знаємо. Він не потребує додаткових рекомендацій, важливо продовжувати роботу, яку він …
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @David_Arakhamia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇺🇦Давид Арахамія/David Arakhamia🇺🇦” (@David_Arakhamia), 8,931 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/David_Arakhamia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
