Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐““๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐”//๐“ฐ๐“ป๐“ธ๐“พ๐“น

Channel

๐““๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐”//๐“ฐ๐“ป๐“ธ๐“พ๐“น

@Delix_group

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

18subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003826924917
TypeChannel
Username@Delix_group
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 17 April 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Delix_group

Growth

182119.57 August 2026 โ€” 21 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 21 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 20 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 19 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 18 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 18โ€“21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 22:1518-1
23 Aug 2026, 10:2419-1
16 Aug 2026, 14:4420-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:0121no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2521first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ’˜1422.6%
๐Ÿ’‹914.5%
๐Ÿ’…812.9%
customย 526964805295986925658.06%
๐Ÿ†’58.06%
๐ŸŒš58.06%
customย 526936432312532557046.45%
๐Ÿ‘ป46.45%
๐Ÿฆ„34.84%
๐Ÿณ23.23%
๐Ÿ•Š23.23%
โ˜ƒ11.61%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

ะ”ะฐะฒะฐะนั‚ะต ะฟะพะดะฐะตะผ!!

12 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC237 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿพ๐ŸŒœ ๐Ÿคฯ…ืื…dition โœจ๐ŸŽ€โฒ‰โณ‘โฒ“โฒญ๐Ÿน ๐ŸŽ€๐Ÿˆโ€โฌ›๐ŸŽ€๐Ÿคelix ๐Ÿ’ค true ๐Ÿ”ซ idle โžฟโž–โžฟโž–๐Ÿฉธโž–โžฟโž–โžฟ๐Ÿช™ ๐ŸŽ€usy : ๐ŸŽ€uqi โœจ๐ŸŽ€huhua ๐Ÿ’™ ๐ŸŽ€iyeon ๐Ÿงช ๐ŸŽ€โœจโค๏ธ๐ŸŽ€ree: OT3 ๐Ÿ–คโœจ โžฟโž–โžฟโž–๐Ÿฉธโž–โžฟโž–โžฟ๐Ÿช™ ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿค ะ‘ะพั‚ ะธ ะพัั‚ะฐะปัŒะฝะพะต ะฒ ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธัั… ๐Ÿ‘€ โžฟโž–โžฟโž–๐Ÿฉธโž–โžฟโž–โžฟ๐Ÿช™ ๐Ÿ’ŽTelegram: @Delix_group ๐Ÿ„ Tik Tok: @delix_group

๐ŸŒš2๐Ÿณ2๐Ÿ‘ป2๐Ÿ•Š2๐Ÿ†’2โ˜ƒ1

11 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC50 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

๐ŸŒš3๐Ÿ†’3๐Ÿ‘ป2

9 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC46 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

เชฝแฅ†แฅ†๊ช€โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿ’…3๐Ÿ’‹2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Delix_group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐““๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐”//๐“ฐ๐“ป๐“ธ๐“พ๐“นโ€ (@Delix_group), 18 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Delix_group.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.