Можно подумать, что я забил на прогу с биомеханикой, но нет, просто небольшая пауза, по работе 24/7 комп пыхтит. Вернусь уже с проверками и корректировками, кстати добавил еще Сириус в список читаемых приборов 🤓
👍5🔥2❤1
Signed Andrey Demchinsky

Channel
@Demchinsky
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,398subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001080182148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Demchinsky |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Demchinsky |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 1,398 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 1,396 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:27 | 1,395 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 1,393 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,392 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 1,390 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 1,385 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 1,384 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 1,385 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 1,383 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 1,383 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 62 | 45.9% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 12.6% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🤓 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.741% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Demchinsky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Можно подумать, что я забил на прогу с биомеханикой, но нет, просто небольшая пауза, по работе 24/7 комп пыхтит. Вернусь уже с проверками и корректировками, кстати добавил еще Сириус в список читаемых приборов 🤓
👍5🔥2❤1
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
ИИ всё чаще с удовольствием показывают в двух крайностях: либо как замену человеку, либо как бесполезную игрушку. Это называется технология в пубертате. Новое исследование в Натуре - хороший пример того, как ИИ приносит пользу. В описанном варианте он не изобретал лекарство, а помогал исследователям за короткое время проанализировать огромный массив научных публикаций, сформулировать перспективные гипотезы и сузить …
❤4👍2
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Вчера общались с Екатериной Шаталовой по поводу программы с биомеханикой, она резонно подсветила, что нужен простой вариант для хирургов, который будет без моей взрывбашкилюбви к дотошной детализации 😇 В общем начал добавлять такой раздел, в нем предусмотрено три практических сценария: 1. Прогнозирование «че будет при операции со временем» 2. Сравнение нескольких видов операции при одинаковом рефракционном запросе …
❤4🔥2😁2
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Video, posted without a caption
👏5🤗2🔥1
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Вчера добавил чтение нового прибора - MediWorks ScanSys. У него оказался такой большой диаметр покрытия, что пришлось переделывать модуль профиля утолщения роговицы. Между прочим у меня удобно смотреть конус, потому что прям на срезе роговицы виден коридор нормы и реальный профиль, а не как в белин-амброзио. Потом пошел дальше и сделал инвертированный график, чтобы нагляден был эктатический процесс, покажу. Короче…
🔥8❤1
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Ну вот, оптику поправили. У нее есть ограничения конечно, потому что в расчетах пентакама нет реальных параметров хрусталика, длины глаза. Хруст вставлен идеализированный, длина глаза стандартная, поэтому назвал функцией рассеяния точки РОГОВИЦЫ, так будет правильнее. Если я найду информацию по ИОЛ, то можно будет моделировать оптические эффекты и с ними, прога и так уже довольно много умеет, как будет свободное вр…
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Пожалуй на сегодня с меня хватит, у меня кровь из глаз от этого шедевра 😅 Так плюс минус выглядит каждый этап на старте - кесямеся непонятная, а потом либо нормально, либо в мусорку 🤔
🔥10❤1
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Продолжаю развлекать, но теперь тех, кто кольца ставит
🔥4
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Тут изолированы те зоны, в которых обнаружено напряжение выше нормы, можно смотреть что происходит внутри и на каких уровнях
🔥7
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Закончил, теперь эта прога делает все, что нужно. Кто статью совместную с Андреем хочет? Для этого нужны данные для экспериментов по расчету кератоконуса. Пентакам и ВГД.
🔥6❤1
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Прогнозирование биомеханики роговицы Ну, считайте закончил, это 71 итерация уже, кажется постоянно, что чего-то не хватает, где-то логика рушится, приходится переделывать. Но сейчас модель работает хорошо, осталось провести эксперименты с реальными парами данных и откалибровать.
❤6
Signed Andrey Demchinsky
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Demchinsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Андрей Демчинский” (@Demchinsky), 1,398 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Demchinsky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.