Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 93 days, net -515. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,732–25,401 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 20:09
24,809
-2
5 Nov 2026, 18:15
24,811
-14
4 Nov 2026, 15:05
24,825
+6
3 Nov 2026, 16:49
24,819
-11
2 Nov 2026, 15:09
24,830
-3
1 Nov 2026, 15:55
24,833
-15
31 Oct 2026, 18:57
24,848
-6
30 Oct 2026, 20:01
24,854
-11
29 Oct 2026, 23:30
24,865
-4
28 Oct 2026, 21:05
24,869
-3
27 Oct 2026, 19:37
24,872
+7
26 Oct 2026, 18:58
24,865
+8
25 Oct 2026, 16:46
24,857
-1
23 Oct 2026, 14:26
24,858
+12
22 Oct 2026, 13:11
24,846
+13
21 Oct 2026, 04:17
24,833
-8
18 Oct 2026, 22:46
24,841
-11
18 Oct 2026, 01:40
24,852
-1
17 Oct 2026, 04:58
24,853
-20
16 Oct 2026, 05:11
24,873
first reading
Engagement
377 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.46%
avg views ÷ 24,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
128 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
128
of 377 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 127 of 128 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
377 (30 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
300,360
Reactions total
3,604
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,410
Videos
≈2,690
Links
≈3,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14h 47m
Average length
4m 50s
Measured directly from 184 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,792 reactions across 371 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,616
63.9%
👍
2,418
27.5%
🫡
651
7.40%
👏
65
0.739%
🥰
42
0.478%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 375 of the 377 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,969 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 377 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 128 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
مِــــــن مدى الألف متر المُعتمد للكلاشن
تــــم تخفيض تسع مية وتسعة وتسعين
متـــــــــــــر واحد يكفِّي نقتلك فيه لكن
بعدما نوصل المترس نقل لك #وذلحين!?
كـــــــم نصحناك ترجع يا المغرر مواطن
لا يودف بك الـــــــــداشر محمد أبستين
هكذا هي نهاية كـــــــــــــــل بياع خاين
باع نفسه وخان الأرض والعرض والدين
#ردفان_الرقيمي
#تطهير_سلسلة_جبال_كهبوب
https://t.me/RadfanAlrgimi11
ما اوضح من الشمس غير الموقف الواضح
ذي اتخذنـــــــــــــــاه بالعــــاني وبالمفتوح
شاهــــــد وتابع وركّـــــز واسمع القــــــارح
قبــــــــــاض الارواح في مشهد يـرد الروح
#عبدالرحمن_الريامي
• جودة عالية
🎞 قصيدة (( وفاة السلام ))
• الشاعر | عزيز الردماني
• إنتاج | اتحاد الشعراء والمنشدين
الـتـصعـيـد بـالـتـصعـيـد 1448هـ
؛•••••••••••••••••••
زوامل أنصارالله القناة الرسمية
تنفيذ اتحاد الشعراء والمنشدين
🎵 #زوامل_أنصار_الله_الرسمية 🎵
🌐 T.me/ZawamlAnsarallah
القصيدة التي القيتها في النكف القبلي لإبنـــــا #مديرية_ثلاء_وعزلها محافظة عمران يوم الثلاثاء ٢٣ جماد اول ١٤٤٨ه.. بساحة الجميعة
من #الجميمة هــــــــد ياحادي نكفنا بالعـزوم
واقدم على نجران أرض اجداد الانصار القدام
قد راعي الحـــلات من بدري على ضو النجوم
بـكـر وهـو مشعوف عاصر شاربه صايم صيام
كمـّــن قبيلي من صباح الصبح دافي بالجروم
والمحزم الشكه على حقـويه #والزاكي_كرام
اهــل الجرامل والكند ذي صوتها يجلى الهموم
…
#شواظي_الموت
قوَّات صنعا على ٱلعدوان كَمّ ٱلكَم
شوَاظي الموت عاد الواقع ابدَاها
والزّحف جوِّي وعبر اليابسه واليَم
وبالزرارات من صنعا على ٱعداها
نيران ماتِنطَفِي وانكال ما ترحَم
غبني لمَن ساقها سلمان وٱدَّاها
ودَلَّها بالغرور ابليسها وٱقسَم
لاما خدعها بهذا الشعب وٱرداها
الرُّعب خيّم على نجد البلا وٱلتَم
وحامض الرِّيق عشَّاها وغدَّاها
أبكى مصافي حقول النفط فيها دم
يوم الدفاعات بالحاصل …
الشاعر /علي المغربي
...................ا
بالفَرط صوتي وصارُوخَه
ذي سُرعته تِحتِسِب بالمَاخ
واصمود ذا الشعب واشموخه
وقوة رجاجِيل صُمخ اطنَاخ
عادت لنا (حيس )و(الخوخة)
و(الباب)، و(البير)، و(المِسراخ)
قالوا السقوط خطة مطبوخه
قلنا لهم ياحَلى الطبَّاخ
صِبنا العدو وسط نافُوخَه
ودُسنا على جيشه النَّفاخ
سبعة مطارات مَنجُوخَه
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 377 posts we hold for @Dhaifsalman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @Dhaifsalman as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
25 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Dhaifsalman named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@husyn_altaar named in 5 posts, 5 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
@hamagrabi named in 1 post, 26 October 2026 – 26 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الشاعر بسام شانع @bssamshana · 28,655 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
قناة الشاعر صقر اللاحجي / الشاعر صقر اللاحجي / قناة صقراللاحجي / صقر اللاحجي @saqerallahjy · 31,418 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
قناة الشاعر أمين الجوفي الرسمية @AminAljofe · 35,069 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
زوامل سالم المسعودي 🎵 @salemalmasody · 92,725 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
شبكة المجاهدين الإعلامية @MojahdeenMN · 20,762 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
اتحاد الشعراء والمنشدين الرسمية @UnionofPoetsandMinstrels · 28,696 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
زوامل عيسى الليث @zwamlallaith · 259,642 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
قناة الشاعر عبدالسلام المتميز @Abdessalem7 · 21,087 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
الدكتور أحمد مطهر الشامي @DrAhmedAlshami · 22,388 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 September 2026
💠 قناة حسن الهادي - برنامج رجال الله 💠 @Hassen_Al_hadi · 31,576 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
الشاعر محمد الوظاف @Alwadhaf · 118,275 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
السيد عبدالملك بدر الدين الحوثي @abdulmalikAlhouthi · 19,233 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 September 2026
زوامل المنشد محمد المحفدي @MohammedAlmhfde · 19,373 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
قناة زوامل سالم المسعودي @Zwamlalmasodi · 33,998 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 September 2026
زوامل أنصار الله الرسمية @ZawamlAnsarallah · 138,035 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
شبكة الفرقان @alforgan_net · 32,947 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
حسين الطير @Hussein_Altair · 22,182 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
زوامل وأناشيد أنصار الله @Zwaml100 · 27,355 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 September 2026
زوامل عدي السفياني 2026 @zwamlalsoviany · 162,954 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
️ قناة الشاعر صقر اللاحجي الرسمية️ @saqerallahji12 · 22,188 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 September 2026
محمد عبدالسلام الناطق الرسمي لانصار الله @abdulsalamsalah · 33,998 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
زوامل عدي السفياني الرسمية @OdayAlsoviani · 72,436 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
مؤسسة الإمام الهادي الثقافية @Alhady_co17 · 45,203 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
كونوا أنصار الله @KonoAnsarAllah · 21,719 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الشاعر ضيف الله سلمان” (@Dhaifsalman), 24,809 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dhaifsalman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.