Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 迪迦榜ㅎ 福利

Channel

迪迦榜ㅎ 福利

@DiJaoooo1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,384subscribers

+3,102 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004434604552
TypeChannel
Username@DiJaoooo1
Created23 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DiJaoooo1

Growth

4,2827,4875,884.510 August 2026 — 4,282 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,412 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,995 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,214 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,388 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,801 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,482 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,487 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,384 subscribers7,38410 August 20262 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3,102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,801–7,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 03:317,384-103
30 Aug 2026, 12:537,487+5
27 Aug 2026, 05:287,482+1,681
24 Aug 2026, 02:375,801+413
20 Aug 2026, 06:225,388+174
17 Aug 2026, 13:145,214+219
14 Aug 2026, 13:544,995+583
10 Aug 2026, 19:574,412+130
10 Aug 2026, 09:154,282first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.3%
avg views ÷ 7,384 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,640
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.157%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total40,033
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4679.3%
👍35.17%
🔥35.17%
🥰35.17%
😁23.45%
💯11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC803 viewsread 28 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 巨乳大奶少妇人妻熟女学生少女 📢 大学生爆操视频AV福利 📢 🔞女同百合拉拉 | 蕾丝边 18+ 📢 步兵统领pmv 暴力混剪 📢 恋活频道 | Koikatu Channel 中转频道 📢 自慰自拍反差露出高潮 📢 ai初中 📢 熟女海角少妇 📢 糖心之家 📢 人妻海角乱伦/巨乳少妇熟女 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

25 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

一位喜欢寻求奇异体验的狼友【成都】,点点关注,分享豪赤车车不迷路,麻包谷,甚有 福利直出の频道,找一找,会发现新大陆,一起追求刺激! 小土豆の车库☝️https://t.me/tudoucheku 土豆家族☝️https://t.me/tudoujiazu

21 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈3,040 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#福利姬 艺名:阿雅 车牌:@Yaaaaalisa 频道: https://t.me/+scgWi-hua7VmMGQx 标签🏷️:#嫩妹 #三通 #多p #吞精 #耐桩 #听话 #毒龙 优点 :爱干净 无异味 做前必须过板 听话 【服务顶级 态度极好】口活非常舒服 课表真实度100% 有吞精 【吞下去】 毒龙:区别在别的是给你舔 她是在给你舔干净 缺点:不太会化妆 有点小肚子 阿雅福利视频参考【1】 https://t.me/DijiaEZ_bot?start=8478b02c 阿雅福利视频参考【2】 https://t.me/DijiaEZ_bot?start=c3ccbce2

10🔥3🥰3😁2

19 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC≈3,320 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

⚡️迪迦指南导航 😈小琪。 700p 已上岸 🥵猫教主。 900p 情绪价值高 女友感 日感十足 迪迦心尖尖 🤗成都香菜福利频道 成都靠谱出击 🤗曦曦。 600p 嫩妹 听话 待开发 👅米宝宝。 嫩妹母狗 求着被操 喷水 母狗味 十足 耐桩 🍓阿雅。 嫩妹sm 吞精 福利姬 耐桩 三通 爱干净 尺度大 多p 🥰成都小土豆车库 嫩妹靠谱出击 待更……😆 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱

💯1

18 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈3,430 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

依旧米宝宝 嫩妹中的母狗 车牌:@awmmio988 频道: https://t.me/aioomm08 体验 :有一种力不从心 无法满足的感觉 哇哇哇 👉点击 米宝宝报告链接 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 米宝宝福利视频【1】https://t.me/DijiaEZ_bot?start=759f74e9 米宝宝福利视频【2】https://t.me/DijiaEZ_bot?start=4f5b2daf

7

12 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈5,180 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Telegram 中文圈搜索引擎,积木JIMU 帮你查询任何您想要的群组、频道(不论公开与私密) 👉 助力可提升搜索排名与曝光 🚀

9 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈6,250 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

花名:曦曦 车牌: @jizi2008 频道: https://t.me/wahaha431 服务:具体看频道 体验:总体下来还是可以的 老师很听话 属于真正的刚下海 叫的时候有点害羞 不催不急 不下菜 推荐 :喜欢嫩妹的朋友可以去 毕竟是嫩妹 不太主动 但是指哪儿打哪儿 不推荐: 期望不要抱太高 毕竟刚下水 羞涩很多东西待开发 ⚠️ 妹子属于纯嫩妹 长相不错 吃服务车的就别去了 毕竟是嫩妹 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 小曦福利视频参考:https://t.me/DiJxst_bot?start=cb58ad46

11

9 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈5,640 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

推荐一个可以看成都出击老师实拍福利收录集合频道 成都的嫩妹御姐还是太权威了!看福利视频打飞机就行了 看片出击 两不误 来成都 想出击? 怕踩坑! 来出击福利频道⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 野战后续点这里 看福利实拍关注👉 https://t.me/CDCJFL

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DiJaoooo1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DiJaoooo1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 563,907 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“迪迦榜ㅎ 福利” (@DiJaoooo1), 7,384 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DiJaoooo1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.