Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Morteza's Junkyard 🍁

Channel

Morteza's Junkyard 🍁

@DiabolicalMaterialism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002136139570
TypeChannel
Username@DiabolicalMaterialism
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DiabolicalMaterialism

Growth

727975.512 August 2026 — 79 subscribers13 August 2026 — 79 subscribers19 August 2026 — 77 subscribers25 August 2026 — 78 subscribers2 September 2026 — 75 subscribers10 September 2026 — 72 subscribers18 September 2026 — 73 subscribers7312 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:3773+1
10 Sept 2026, 10:1772-3
2 Sept 2026, 02:5275-3
25 Aug 2026, 20:5378+1
19 Aug 2026, 11:1377-2
13 Aug 2026, 02:2379no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:4879first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 15s
Average length
6m 15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭1441.2%
926.5%
🙏514.7%
🔥411.8%
🕊25.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC23 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

نکته جالب اینه که من خر بعد از اینکه اینو نوشتم بازم یادم نبود درستش کنم! (الان کردم)

😭6

10 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lesbiangodard

Mahasti gotta be one of the most exploited women ever why is she still forced to sing every song on earth through generative bullshit. Let the poor woman rest

🙏5

9 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Okay so instead of playing Return to Salem's Gate, I played Last Hour. Some mistakes are waiting for anyone brave enough to listen but overall I guess it's fine for a song which I hadn't played for months, maybe even a year.

4🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026

It's fine I shall put my phone's stupid mic to use and see how it goes

9 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I WILL post a cover (I don't like calling them "covers" technically because it's just me playing along to the original track but I don't know a better word) of Early Moods' "Return to Salem's Gate" tonight and I WILL try not to mess it up too much (I already know I'm gonna be playing horribly AND consistently off the beat)

1

9 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Wasn't in the mood for much exploration this week in terms of music besides that Parquet Courts (which was recommended by a friend; I enjoyed it a lot, especially the post-punkier bits). I just went through the first 4 Riot albums and I gotta say, these guys sure knew how to switch up their style. First album is just in the vein of earlier Heavy Metal inspired by those proto-metal bands of the 70's; then they suddenl

3

8 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC43 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

تازه دیدم دوتا کلمه توی Description چنلم جا گذاشته بودم و خبر نداشتم از این غلط‌های فاحش. ایشالا به حق علی جوری کشته بشم که بمیرم.

😭8🔥1🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC44 viewsread 12 August 2026

I believe these two quotes showcase [some of] his ideas on the matter: The usual reproach against the essay, that it is fragmentary and random, itself assumes the giveness of totality and thereby the identity of subject and object, and it suggests that man is in control of totality. But the desire of the essay is not to seek and filter the eternal out of the transitory; it wants, rather, to make the transitory eterna

8 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC41 viewsread 12 August 2026

I forgot to share something that I really loved about Adorno's Essay as Form which I mentioned a couple of nights ago. As you can probably guess from the title, he's gonna discuss many aspects of Essays and why they are relatively special/unique. What I really enjoyed was his perspective regarding the essay's non-identity; the essay not conforming to the idea of totality and continuity; that it must necessarily exist

7 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC49 viewsread 12 August 2026

Anyways, the introduction Engels wrote for this in 1888 (around I think 41 years after the speech was given initially), is incredibly insightful. Definitely recommend reading this to anyone interested because it's very short and straight-forward!

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DiabolicalMaterialism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Morteza's Junkyard 🍁” (@DiabolicalMaterialism), 73 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DiabolicalMaterialism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.