Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Узник Косого переулка

Channel

Узник Косого переулка

@DiagonAlleyPrisoner

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,175subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001854127085
TypeChannel
Username@DiagonAlleyPrisoner
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DiagonAlleyPrisoner

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1166,2386,1777 August 2026 — 6,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,201 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,204 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,191 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,176 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,161 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,150 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,138 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,136 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,128 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,116 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,167 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,187 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,189 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,181 subscribers2 October 2026 — 6,238 subscribers8 October 2026 — 6,227 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,212 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,211 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,204 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,189 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,177 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,185 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,181 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,175 subscribers6,1757 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,098–6,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 22:516,175-6
2 Nov 2026, 17:156,181-4
30 Oct 2026, 13:496,185+8
27 Oct 2026, 04:116,177-12
23 Oct 2026, 17:486,189-15
20 Oct 2026, 08:046,204-7
17 Oct 2026, 01:306,211-1
13 Oct 2026, 23:066,212-15
8 Oct 2026, 23:376,227-11
2 Oct 2026, 14:376,238+57
16 Sept 2026, 21:376,181-8
12 Sept 2026, 17:006,189+2
8 Sept 2026, 20:586,187+20
3 Sept 2026, 20:166,167+51
31 Aug 2026, 08:246,116-12
28 Aug 2026, 16:576,128-8
26 Aug 2026, 03:286,136-2
23 Aug 2026, 07:256,138-12
20 Aug 2026, 05:466,150-11
17 Aug 2026, 09:386,161first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 6,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
647
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held58 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total18,777
Reactions total1,228
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 28s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,768 reactions across 58 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,65159.6%
❤‍🔥28710.4%
🔥1947.01%
👍1635.89%
😁802.89%
🎉511.84%
🎃491.77%
👎441.59%
💔441.59%
😢311.12%
👀281.01%
💯190.686%
😍190.686%
🤔190.686%
🤗120.434%
👌110.397%
🦄90.325%
⚡70.253%
🍾70.253%
🐳60.217%
15 further kinds371.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,768 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 58 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DiagonAlleyPrisoner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC197 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Экскурсия по магазину Гарри Поттера от Драко Малфоя ⚡️

😁11⚡1❤1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC349 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Том Фелтон (Драко Малфой) на Оксфорд-стрит ⚡️

🔥20❤10😁3

5 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC470 views34 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🪄 В Лондоне открылся самый большой официальный магазин «Гарри Поттера» в Великобритании! 4 ноября на знаменитой Оксфорд-стрит открылся огромный двухэтажный магазин площадью почти 2000 м², оформленный в стиле Косого переулка! Здесь можно увидеть украинского железнобрюхого дракона над Гринготтсом, настоящий трёхэтажный «Ночной рыцарь» в натуральную величину, заглянуть в лавки волшебных товаров и попробовать сливочное…

❤31😍3

5 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC494 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Почему Тома Реддла из "Тайной комнаты" не было в шестом фильме? ⚡️

❤23👍3🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC548 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Какую цитату вы выбрали? ⚡️

😁18❤5❤‍🔥4😍2👀1

5 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC599 views43 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Гарри Поттер и Волан-де-Морт на самом деле родственники! ⚡️ Несмотря на то что Гарри Поттер и Волан-де-Морт были заклятыми врагами, они приходились друг другу дальними родственниками. И связывали их не кто-нибудь, а три брата Певерелла из знаменитой «Сказки о трёх братьях». Гарри был потомком Игнотуса Певерелла — младшего брата, которому принадлежала Мантия-невидимка. Она передавалась из поколения в поколение, пок…

❤33🔥7👍3

4 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC342 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Том Фелтон за кулисами «Гарри Поттера и Проклятого дитя»! ⚡️ Свежие фотографии с бэкстейджа бродвейского спектакля, в котором Фелтон исполняет роль Драко Малфоя.

🎉24❤13💋3🔥1😁1

4 Nov 2026, 17:02 UTC494 views43 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Эванна Линч заранее репетировала разговоры с актёрами «Гарри Поттера» ⚡️ Когда Эванна Линч получила роль Полумны Лавгуд в «Ордене Феникса», она была огромной поклонницей «Гарри Поттера». Поэтому встреча с Дэниелом Рэдклиффом, Рупертом Гринтом и Эммой Уотсон стала для неё настоящим испытанием. В интервью 2021 года Эванна призналась, что настолько волновалась перед общением с Золотым трио, что по дороге на съёмочную…

❤33🤗6❤‍🔥4

4 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC541 views53 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Том Фелтон (Драко Малфой) показывает новый магазин Гарри Поттера на Оксфорд-стрит ⚡️

❤44😍5👍2🐳1😁1

4 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC647 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Звезда «Очень странных дел» Ноа Шнапп (Уилл Байерс) отметил Хэллоуин в Хогвартсе! 🪄 Актёр посетил студию Warner Bros. в Лондоне, посвящённую фильмам о Гарри Поттере. Ноа примерил мантию Гриффиндора, взял волшебную палочку и сфотографировался на фоне Хогвартса. В своём Instagram он написал: «В этом году я отнёсся к Хэллоуину очень серьёзно!» 🎃

❤‍🔥35❤14🔥4😁2

4 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC658 views26 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Питера Клэффи хотят видеть в роли Билла Уизли! ⚡️ Поклонники «Гарри Поттера» предлагают кандидатуру Питера Клэффи на роль старшего брата Рона в новом сериале HBO. Актёр известен по роли Дункана Высокого в сериале «Рыцарь Семи Королевств». Его кандидатуру обсуждают ещё с весны. Одни фанаты считают, что внешне он отлично подходит Биллу, а другие видят в нём скорее Чарли Уизли. В оригинальных фильмах Билла сыграл До…

❤20🤔6

4 Nov 2026, 08:59 UTC601 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Актрисы, игравшие Кэти Белл ⚡️

❤18🔥2❤‍🔥1🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @DiagonAlleyPrisoner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz356 voters

Кто из этих персонажей НЕ присутствовал на первой встрече Отряда Дамблдора в «Кабаньей голове»?

  1. Колин Криви18%
  2. Захария Смит12%
  3. Симус Финниган44%
  4. Энтони Голдштейн26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Узник Косого переулка” (@DiagonAlleyPrisoner), 6,175 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DiagonAlleyPrisoner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.