Channel
@Didyoureallyknow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,620subscribers
-301 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001123420940 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Didyoureallyknow |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Didyoureallyknow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 16,620 | -38 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 16,658 | -18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 16,676 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:24 | 16,684 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:33 | 16,693 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 16,708 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 16,718 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 16,725 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 16,728 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 16,733 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 16,732 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 16,731 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 16,736 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 16,747 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 16,758 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 16,768 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 16,775 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 16,785 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 16,793 | -20 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 16,813 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (3 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 11,603 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
This is a Dubai trader 🤯 He buys signals for $20,000 from Arab informants and shares them for free on his Telegram channel. There are NO other channels like this! Each signal brings in 350% profit; this channel is a gem 💎 ✅ Subscribe - https://t.me/+to68PSiKFzsyYjlk
⚠️THE MARKET HAS COME TO LIFE and I'm shocked 😨how this man senses it... He's currently recruiting a team for a private marathon, where he'll show you that trading is more than just charts ↗️ For those in doubt 🤔 Everything is absolutely free and they'll pull you by the hand to results. One NUANCE I've opened free access to the channel until the morning, and then we'll continue working with those who have already …
#DASH/USDT ANALYSIS DASH has broken out of the descending triangle pattern with significant volume, signaling strong bullish momentum. Currently, it is trading above the 100MA, which is acting as a key support level, while a retest of the breakout level is also expected. A successful retest and hold could trigger a further upward rally.
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin is consolidating within the pennant pattern and is currently trading above the support trendline. Price is also moving inside the Ichimoku cloud, indicating continued uncertainty. A solid breakout above the pennant could trigger a bullish rally, while a breakdown below the support trendline would invalidate the pattern.
#ETH/USDT ANALYSIS ETH has broken out of the descending triangle pattern with significant volume, triggering a strong rally. Currently, it is retesting the breakout level, with the former supply zone now acting as a key demand area. A successful retest could lead to further upside, while a failed retest may trigger a downward move.
#BTC DOMINANCE ANALYSIS BTC.D is rebounding from the support trendline of the rising wedge pattern and is currently trading above the Ichimoku cloud, which is acting as support. A breakout above the wedge resistance trendline would invalidate the pattern and signal further upside. On the other hand, a breakdown below the wedge support would confirm further downside in BTC Dominance. It’s important to note that BT…
#USDT DOMINANCE ANALYSIS USDT Dominance is trading below the resistance trendline of the symmetrical triangle, indicating continued consolidation. The Ichimoku cloud is acting as support below the current price action. We need to wait for a solid breakout or breakdown to confirm the next directional move. It’s important to note that USDT Dominance often exhibits an inverse correlation with the broader cryptocurre…
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin has broken out of the descending triangle with strong volume, signaling a bullish shift in momentum. Price is now moving in for a retest of the Ichimoku cloud and the broken trendline. A successful hold above these levels would confirm bullish continuation, watch price action closely.
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin has broken above the descending triangle resistance trendline, signaling a potential shift in momentum. The 50MA is currently acting as a resistance barrier, limiting further upside. A successful breakout above the 50MA would confirm strength and could trigger a continued upward rally.
#TURBO/USDT ANALYSIS TURBO is consolidating within a falling wedge pattern and is currently holding above the support trendline. This structure suggests a potential bullish setup, where a confirmed breakout could trigger upward momentum. However, a breakdown below the wedge would invalidate the pattern and signal further downside, watch price action closely.
#BTC DOMINANCE ANALYSIS BTC.D is consolidating within a rising wedge while trading inside the Ichimoku cloud, signaling indecision. Price remains in a neutral zone with no clear trend direction.A confirmed breakout or breakdown will determine the next move. It’s important to note that BTC Dominance often shares an inverse relationship with the altcoin market cap.
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin has broken down from the symmetrical triangle with strong volume, indicating bearish momentum. It is currently holding above a horizontal demand zone, while the Ichimoku cloud acts as resistance overhead. A retest of the triangle is likely, and a breakdown below the demand zone would open the door for further downside. Monitor price action closely for confirmation.
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Didyoureallyknow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Did You Know” (@Didyoureallyknow), 16,620 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Didyoureallyknow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.