Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⎯ ”𝕻ℴ𝗋ֺ𝐭︨ 𝕶ℯֺ𝒻ִֺ𝒾𝗋ֺ𝒶„ 𓈒 ּ

Channel

⎯ ”𝕻ℴ𝗋ֺ𝐭︨ 𝕶ℯֺ𝒻ִֺ𝒾𝗋ֺ𝒶„ 𓈒 ּ

@DkmKefir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

341subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002493781572
TypeChannel
Username@DkmKefir
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DkmKefir

Growth

335344339.56 August 2026 — 340 subscribers7 August 2026 — 339 subscribers15 August 2026 — 335 subscribers22 August 2026 — 344 subscribers30 August 2026 — 341 subscribers3416 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 334–345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:04341-3
22 Aug 2026, 13:24344+9
15 Aug 2026, 02:07335-4
7 Aug 2026, 08:55339-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:33340first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 341 subscribers
Avg views / post
86.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
64.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total260
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

894 reactions across 8 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53617828796448625789710.9%
custom 52514770642377441619410.5%
custom 5325924966489684182849.40%
custom 5326027117991849149768.50%
custom 5276240905068633809697.72%
custom 5325967770133756366475.26%
custom 5215228760030214227455.03%
custom 5467804379274836660434.81%
custom 5213004821669380342424.70%
custom 5361792401587349529424.70%
custom 5233548011023398842414.59%
custom 5325565842799228108414.59%
custom 5274220561042534325394.36%
custom 5210900618406821712384.25%
custom 5235644698093185375374.14%
custom 5361869118293189484262.91%
custom 5364003717039301035121.34%
custom 521105244979570168391.01%
custom 523344826899788575370.783%
custom 523344377216712497350.559%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 894 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
151
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
110
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DkmKefir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC15 viewsread 6 August 2026

🥖89 рк. 🤩 следующую работу увидите только когда наберете 160 рк.

6 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC148 views96 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌷🌷ׅ 🤩ew 🤩ork 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 🌷 𓈒 ⎯ 🌷 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ🥖#Practice🤍#Banner. 🥖𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕💕💕 𓈒 ׁ 🌟Я делал этот баннер одному писателю. Banner for @Book_DrRatio 🥖🌟🌟🕯🕯🕯🕯

custom 527422056104253432532custom 532602711799184914931custom 527624090506863380928custom 54678043792748366605

1 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC631 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😀😀😀 ২ׅ 🤩𐐫ℓֺ֪🤩α̫֮֮۫ϐׁ 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 🎁 𓈒 ⎯ 💋 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ 🖤🖤🌟🤍ема: пейринги из геншина ִ ׄ ‌꒱֫ ּ Чтобы участвовать нужно.. 🤍🤍🤩. Репостнуть к себе в канал данный пост (не стикером). 🥖🤩 🤩. Написать свой юз, псевдоним и юз вашего канала. 🤍🔤осле всех этих действий я сам напишу вам и скину ссылку на группу, где будет дополнительная информация. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🌟🌟🥖ִ𝗆ִℯִֺ𝗆ִ𝖻ℯֺ𝗋ֺ:: @tetradbcmertu

custom 52762409050686338093custom 53260271179918491492custom 52742205610425343251

31 Jul 2026, 23:04 UTC523 views125 reactions14 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌷🌷ׅ 🤩ew 🤩ork 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 🌷 𓈒 ⎯ 🌷 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ🥖#Order🤍#Avatar. 🥖𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕💕💕 𓈒 ׁ 🌟Привет, заказ был сделан за спасибо, не удивляйтесь, что он такой всратый. 🥖🌟🌟🕯🕯🕯🕯

custom 532602711799184914943custom 527624090506863380938custom 546780437927483666038custom 52742205610425343256

28 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC423 views166 reactions16 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌹🌹ׅ 🤩ew 🤩ork 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕 𓈒 ⎯ 💕 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ🥖#Order🤍#Banner. 🥖𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕💕💕 𓈒 ׁ 🌟Заказ моей любимой мюсле. Хотел бы поблагодарить Рэй за помощь!!! 🥖🌟🌟🕯🕯🕯🕯

custom 532592496648968418255custom 525147706423774416152custom 536178287964486257851custom 53640037170393010358

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DkmKefir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 48,098 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

ㅤ 𝃜 ⃞࣫ ⃞棚性 ⋮ #𝗴𝕚ְ𝅽⃛ٗ𝐟‌⃪𝙪𝒌̤𝐢⃪⃜ᮬᩙ𝐬⃪︭︭𝐬⃪︭︭𝐞‌𝐫֮﹙𝟲𝇄𝟟﹚
@bann_gifu · 92
2 posts
Итоги (Дом Ани✴️❇️)
@BKDKanswers · 2
2 posts
𝒮 urprise from 𝒜lora||ИКМ༄˖°
@Aloraa_simm · 56
1 post
Архив отца
@apxiBfather
1 post
ㅤ۪ ⎯ ㅤ𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡1𝐯𝐞┊𝐥𝐲𝐧𝐧 𝐩ꪮ𝐫𝐭 ⏜݄͡
@archive_lynn · 1
1 post
α̫۫꯱ֺ֪ჩ᷎︩͘ꪱᩙℓֺ֪ ꪱᩙი๋︩𝗳︫ ๋𐐫
@ASHILinfo · 7
1 post
𝒀𝑶𝑺𝑯𝑰 情報
@bioyoshikiinfo · 4
1 post
Закрыт▌░ུ ̑ꨭ ִֺ۪ 𝓓𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗔𝗡 ݁𝓟𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗼 00:00:01▐
@demianportfolio7 · 18
1 post
[𝑪𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅]Geto cm/cf
@getocf · 12
1 post
𝘐𝘯𝘧𝘰
@info_hurma · 2
1 post
Инфо логова
@info_ot_fishl · 4
1 post
𓈒ㅤׁ ᨦ 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 ::
@Info_SefkasPortfolio · 12
1 post
✄Info Kisusa
@InfoKisusa · 1
1 post
𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨 ꨄ
@infoofdottore_port · 2
1 post
INFO
@irinaM_info · 5
1 post
RAY’S INFO
@jskqldoxiwneb · 7
1 post
[РЕСТ]꒳𝓜𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪|𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽[ᴅᴋᴍ/iᴋʍ/ᴋᴋʍ] Пушин
@melissa_portfolio · 184
1 post
• 𝕽𝐄𝐈𝐊𝐀 ┊ 𝕻𝐎𝐑𝐓’, ㅤ۟ ㅤ ۫ㅤ ‌ུ,
@RE1KAPORT · 63
1 post
//𝖱𝗎𝖻𝗒'𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈.!¡
@rubysp0rt_info · 38
1 post
(закрыто-переезд??)#.𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗛 ⃗ ᵖᵒʳᵗ
@seraphPort02 · 139
1 post
ㅤ░⃝𝙏a͝᪾mːi𝐨'𝐬 ֻ𝙡it!𝖙ؔ𝖑e rࣼ𝑜𝘰𝘮.̼
@simpTamio · 55
1 post
Info VDH
@VDHRay7 · 7
1 post
𝐕𝕴𝐃𝐄𝕺 𝕶𝐌 | 𝗩𝗲𝗶𝗹 𝗢𝗳 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘁愛 #𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍
@vide0_km · 58
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⎯ ”𝕻ℴ𝗋ֺ𝐭︨ 𝕶ℯֺ𝒻ִֺ𝒾𝗋ֺ𝒶„ 𓈒 ּ” (@DkmKefir), 341 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DkmKefir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.