Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دندنة قلم

Channel

دندنة قلم

@Doctorcom1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,931subscribers

-204 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001335901950
TypeChannel
Username@Doctorcom1
Descriptionقناة مختصة بالكتابات والاقتباسات
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Doctorcom1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9316,1356,0337 August 2026 — 6,135 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,135 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,132 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,123 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,117 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,104 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,101 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,096 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,093 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,078 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,065 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,056 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,035 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,018 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,005 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,994 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,986 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,978 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,972 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,965 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,954 subscribers1 November 2026 — 5,939 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,931 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 88 days, net -204. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,900–6,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 02:565,931-8
1 Nov 2026, 07:545,939-15
29 Oct 2026, 15:095,954-11
26 Oct 2026, 06:565,965-7
23 Oct 2026, 01:505,972-6
20 Oct 2026, 06:555,978-8
17 Oct 2026, 00:105,986-8
14 Oct 2026, 09:565,994-11
11 Oct 2026, 01:586,005-13
4 Oct 2026, 23:596,018-17
25 Sept 2026, 20:406,035-21
15 Sept 2026, 17:016,056-9
12 Sept 2026, 00:196,065-13
7 Sept 2026, 10:356,078-15
2 Sept 2026, 09:156,093-3
30 Aug 2026, 12:136,096-5
27 Aug 2026, 04:496,101-3
24 Aug 2026, 11:386,104-13
17 Aug 2026, 18:066,117-6
14 Aug 2026, 16:286,123first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 5,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
848
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held28 (24 June 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total848
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
543
Videos
109
Links
444

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

584 reactions across 27 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤21136.1%
💔16728.6%
😁11018.8%
❤‍🔥233.94%
🌚193.25%
👏193.25%
🕊142.40%
🎉50.856%
💘40.685%
🫡40.685%
👍30.514%
🤔30.514%
😨10.171%
🙈10.171%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Oct 2026, 12:01 UTC848 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026

#رسمياً الحكومة حطت رجلها بالفقير !

😁14💔11👍3❤1😨1

Signed Dr. Ameer Al-Jubouri

12 Sept 2026, 22:24 UTC≈1,350 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026

منذُ أن كنتُ طفلاً سُلِبَ منّي الاندفاع فعشتُ طفولتي بين صوتِ الحرب و رفضِ الأماكن فما عادت حقائبُ المدرسة تُغريني، و لا ملابسُ العيد تُبهج طفولتي. كنتُ أُلقي نظرةً من شُرفة منزلنا كأني شخصٌ بالغ فتقع عيناي على أطفال الحيّ كُلَّاً منهم يعرض ألعابه يتسابقون بكثرتها، فلا يُثير المشهد في عقلي سوى سؤالاً واحداً، كيف نجى هؤلاء الأطفال من الواقع، بينما أنا طُويت طفولتي على رفوفه؟ لماذا لم أكبر مثلهم، و بقيتُ معهم بينَ الأز…

❤10❤‍🔥1

8 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,730 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026

والله العظيم كلي حكم عمي استغلوني قبل متفقدوني

🫡4

Signed Mohammed Al_janabi

7 Sept 2026, 22:31 UTC≈1,300 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @MydoctorA96

#تنويه اي واحد يعاني من مشاكل بالترويج او بحملاته الاعلانية او عنده مشكلة بحسابه الاعلاني يتواصل وياي وبضمان استرجاع المبلغ في حال حصول اي خلل في بنود الاتفاق القانوني الذي سيبرم بين الزبون والمروج . للتواصل : تليكرام >> @karrarpixel واتساب >> 07813309267 انستغرام >> اضغط هنا فيس بوك >> اضغط هنا مكتب #كرار_ميديا للدعاية والترويج وادارة الحملات التسويقية والإعلانية 📍 بغداد - المنصور https://t.me/MydoctorA96

❤2

Signed Dr. Ameer Al-Jubouri

23 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,820 views32 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

أشدُّ ما يوجع في هذه الصورة ليس أنها تقف بين الناس، بل أن وراءها إنسانةً مكسورةً مثقلةً بالوجع والمهانة؛ وكان الأولى بمن أراد لها خيرًا أن يصون سترها، ويحفظ كرامتها، ويبعد ألمها عن أعين المتفرجين، لا أن يأتي بها إلى وسط الناس، ويحوّل انكسارها إلى مشهدٍ تتناقله الأبصار والعدسات. هي ليست بحاجة إلى من يتاجر بضعفها، ولا إلى شهرةٍ تُبنى على دمعتها وانكسارها. فالإنسان حين يرى إنسانًا مكسورًا، لا يعرّضه للأنظار، بل يستره؛ …

💔19👏7❤6

Signed Dr. Ameer Al-Jubouri

19 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,620 views44 reactionsread 5 November 2026

سامح والديك. فهم أيضا مروا بطفولة لم يتعافوا منها بعد، ولم يتعلموا كيف يقدمون حبا غير مشروط لأنهم لم يعيشوه هم أنفسهم. لم يكونوا يعرفون دائماً ما يفعلونه، ولم يقصدوا إيذاءك كما تتصوّر. لا تحاول تغييرهم، بل كن أنت المختلف اقطع حلقة الألم المتوارثة، واصنع جيلاً جديداً يتعلم الحب والرعاية دون جراح الماضي.

❤35💔4🕊4💘1

Signed Mohammed Al_janabi

19 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈2,480 views16 reactionsread 5 November 2026

لماذا تنجذب دائما إلى النمط نفسه في العلاقات رغم أنه يؤلمك؟ الوعي هو المفتاح فبدون وعي يتحرك الإنسان بدوافع خفية لا يدركها، فیکرر جرح الطفولة القديم بحثا عن نتيجة مختلفة. مثال واضح من نشأ وهو يشعر بالتقليل، ينجذب لاحقا لشريك يكرر معه الشعور نفسه، ظنا منه أنه سيغير النهاية هذه المرة الانجذاب اللحظى وخفقان القلب من أول نظرة غالبا ليسا حبًا، بل صدى الحرمان قديم يعاود الظهور. حين تعي هذا النمط تصبح حرًا في اختيارك، وتب…

❤16

Signed Mohammed Al_janabi

15 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,940 views23 reactionsread 5 November 2026

هل تساءلت يوما كيف تعرف أنك نضجت عاطفيا؟ النضج لا يعني أن تصبح مثاليا، بل أن تتصالح مع نقصك ونقص الآخرين. مثلا تتوقف عن انتظار الاعتذار الكامل من والديك وتدرك أنهم كانوا فقط بشرا حائرين مثلك. الغضب يتحول تدريجيا إلى تفهم ورحمة. وتتعلم أن الصداقة الحقيقية ليست تبادل أخبار سعيدة، بل مشاركة الهموم والضعف. الدرس الأهم النضج هو أن تصبح صديقا لنفسك أولا.

❤23

Signed Mohammed Al_janabi

4 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC≈2,240 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026

وفي كل فرصة وكل مناسبة لازلت اصرخ بدعاء من اعماق قلب كوته نيران الفراق لتحيل السنتها ملكهم وسبع اجيال من ذراريهم الى رماد فلا تكون لهم قوة لدفعها ولا مواجهتها... اللهم لا تمكنهم ولا ترحمهم وانزل عليهم بلائك وانزل عليهم غضبك ولا تدخلهم في رحمتك وامنع عنهم رزقك واكسر قلوبهم وشتت شملهم ولا توفقهم ولا تعتق ذممهم واهلكهم يا شديد يا قوي. اللهم وان كان بينهم وبين دخول الجنة كلمه مني لا ترحمني ولا تدخلني جنتك ان عفوت عنهم. ا…

❤9💔1

Signed Mohammed Al_janabi

3 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,900 views31 reactionsread 5 November 2026

عدنا سبلت كاعد ويانا على المبردة 💔

😁24💔6👏1

Signed Dr. Ameer Al-Jubouri

1 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,330 views48 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

حتى الذكاء الاصطناعي وياهن 🤣💔

😁41👏3🤔3💘1

Signed Dr. Ameer Al-Jubouri

31 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @MydoctorA96Photo

#تحذير ⚠️ هذه رسالة اختراق احذرو الدخول عليها ! بدأت تصل الى آلاف المستخدمين على منصة التيلكرام ، مجرد الضغط على زر الاشتراك سيتم اختراق حسابكم على منصة التيلكرام ، يرجى مشاركة التحذير هذا لجميع الاصدقاء كما يرجى تفعيل المصادقة ذات العاملين لضمان عدم قدرة اي شخص من الوصول لمحادثاتكم الشخصية https://t.me/MydoctorA96

Signed Dr. Ameer Al-Jubouri

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Doctorcom1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بـــغـــداد 🎈
@xbaghdad · 28,371
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
باب الطوب
@babaltoob · 25,264
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دندنة قلم” (@Doctorcom1), 5,931 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Doctorcom1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.