Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DoughNut 🍩

Channel

DoughNut 🍩

@DoughNutDrops

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,953subscribers

+147 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006853846
TypeChannel
Username@DoughNutDrops
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DoughNutDrops

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,8062,9532,879.57 August 2026 — 2,806 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,806 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,807 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,809 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,821 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,833 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,842 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,845 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,922 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,926 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,930 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,947 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,953 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,784–2,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 01:362,953+6
7 Sept 2026, 09:172,947+17
2 Sept 2026, 16:372,930+4
30 Aug 2026, 15:372,926+4
27 Aug 2026, 17:022,922+77
24 Aug 2026, 14:292,845+3
20 Aug 2026, 20:182,842+9
17 Aug 2026, 19:582,833+12
14 Aug 2026, 12:362,821+12
11 Aug 2026, 10:142,809+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:422,807+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:022,806no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:082,806first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4342.6%
2625.7%
🔥1716.8%
🙏1110.9%
🎉21.98%
💯21.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DoughNutDrops. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC367 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @itisnahomPhoto

This is genuinely disheartening. Let's all contribute what we have.

🙏11

17 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC908 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Samuel_DumpsPhoto

New Release BirrJS 0.1.3 Includes - v.odit.et powered receipt-based provider alternative to chapa (Docs) - resend plugin (Docs) - customizable, ready made checkout ui components (Docs) not having a license shouldn't stop you from accepting payments.with this provider you can start accepting immediately. zero human intervention and no manual receipt checking. once you finally get your business license, swapping t

🔥4

16 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC570 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Robi_makes_stuffPhoto

New odit update v1.27 Recurrings are now auto suggested from the transactions you have When creating a new participant , you now get a "same person ?" dialog, that shows you similar items to merge into that person and a few more things i forgot. @oditet by @rb_wk get the update from the play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.robi.odit

16 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC713 viewsread 7 August 2026

Sometimes i regret not using pulumi for managing my severs😭

12 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,210 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

> Sorry it was a mistake of me to tell you to cut through the lungs to see the heart.

😁33

12 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,180 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.birrjs.dev/docs/get-started ❤️

🔥71

11 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,190 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Honestly thinking about cancelling my claude subscription at this point if they dont make fable part of the normal usage😂

💯2

11 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gpt 5.6 sol is sooooooo much better than fable

5

11 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC763 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dagmawi_BabiPhoto

After weeks of work, ScholarXIV Desktop is finally available on all major platforms!!! Extremely happy about this release! But we're just getting started, we've got big plans for the desktop app and we're constantly improving it! Expect great new features every week! ScholarXIV Desktop (public beta) • ScholarXIV.com/desktop Get it on Windows, MacOS, and Linux! And as always try it out and send us your bug reports

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @DoughNutDrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CodeHype 🚀
@codehype · 23,630
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Vent Here
@vent_here · 47,414
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
Programming & AI Tips 💡
@ProgrammingTip · 46,569
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Century Cinema 🌎
@century_cinema · 73,991
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
Maroset News
@MarosetNews · 30,950
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
GAST Cinema 🎥🍿
@gastcinema · 66,621
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 21 August 2026
Hacker News
@hacker_news_feed · 29,682
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
The Devs
@thedevs · 32,129
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Remote Crypto Jobs
@remotejobshg · 33,107
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
AASTU_OFFICIAL
@pir2011 · 25,853
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
ሰሌዳ | Seleda
@seledadotio · 52,821
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
EBM (Ethioblackmarket.com)
@ethioblackmarketcom · 45,778
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
LinkUp Addis
@LinkUpAddis · 25,427
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
GitHub repos
@github_repos · 27,297
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
Maroset
@Maroset · 60,972
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
Afriwork (Freelance Ethiopia)
@freelance_ethio · 276,877
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Future Aviators Channel
@futureEthiopianpilots · 22,909
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
AAU MEREJA
@AAUMEREJA · 37,133
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026
Jimma University Students 🇪🇹
@Jufirstyear · 23,963
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
EOTC Library
@eotcLIBRARY · 39,004
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
Events Ethiopia
@EventsEthiopia · 30,987
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Ethiopian Business Daily
@Ethiopianbusinessdaily · 41,641
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
ሐዋርያዊ መልሶች
@Apostolic_Answers · 72,309
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
Janderebaw Media
@janderebaw_media · 90,203
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DoughNut 🍩” (@DoughNutDrops), 2,953 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DoughNutDrops.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.