Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr Alarcos

Channel

Dr Alarcos

@DrAlarcos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,734subscribers

-99 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001219469414
TypeChannel
Username@DrAlarcos
Created10 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrAlarcos

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,73411,83811,7866 August 2026 — 11,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,830 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,838 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,832 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,826 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,822 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,820 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,815 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,811 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,809 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,808 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,809 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,806 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,805 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,803 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,803 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,800 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,798 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,796 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,795 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,797 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,796 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,790 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,775 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,760 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,756 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,749 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,743 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,734 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,718–11,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:1611,734-9
15 Sept 2026, 22:0111,743-6
14 Sept 2026, 05:1511,749-7
12 Sept 2026, 09:3911,756-4
10 Sept 2026, 06:4111,760-15
6 Sept 2026, 21:1711,775-15
4 Sept 2026, 07:3811,790-6
3 Sept 2026, 00:0511,796-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:4511,797+2
29 Aug 2026, 20:0411,795-1
28 Aug 2026, 19:5211,796-2
27 Aug 2026, 17:2811,798-2
26 Aug 2026, 17:5311,800-3
25 Aug 2026, 20:4311,803+2
24 Aug 2026, 22:0211,801-2
23 Aug 2026, 10:0711,803-2
21 Aug 2026, 21:0611,805-1
19 Aug 2026, 17:1211,806-3
18 Aug 2026, 17:1511,809+1
17 Aug 2026, 17:1611,808first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 31 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈4,420 viewsread 2 September 2026

¿Se acuerdan de esto de febrero?: https://x.com/i/status/2018344314523238906 Pues seguimos exactamente igual.

30 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC≈9,860 viewsread 2 September 2026

Sé que están ustedes cansados y desilusionados, pero si no se depuran responsabilidades sólo queda esperar hasta la próxima, tal como vaticinó esta canción cuando se publicó en 2013: https://youtu.be/BPuMqc_xGqU?is Sólo pagarán si exigimos que paguen. Sólo si pagan evitaremos que lo vuelvan a hacer. No hay más alternativas.

30 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC≈19,700 viewsread 2 September 2026

https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/ La Casa Blanca admite por escrito: 1⃣ Que el SARS-CoV-2 se generó en un laboratorio con una probabilidad altísima. 2⃣ Que todas las COVID19 en humanos parten de un mismo "paciente cero" que probablemente se infectó en el instituto de Virología de Wuhan. 3⃣ Que no existía (ni existe) evidencia científica que avale el uso de las mascarillas. 4⃣ Que no e

19 Jul 2026, 22:17 UTC≈7,050 viewsread 2 September 2026

Un abrazo desde mi guardia a los argentinos y enhorabuena a todos los españoles. ⭐️⭐️

1 Jul 2026, 05:43 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @rubengisbertoficial

EMPIEZA el BLANQUEAMIENTO POLÍTICO de la DANA culpando de la tragedia al Cambio Climático y su agresividad: https://youtu.be/zHOHXA1gCoc?is=82E_DCXqfXOqUfod

13 May 2026, 13:55 UTC≈17,600 viewsread 2 September 2026

Ojo aquí: https://x.com/i/status/2054555219908874587

8 May 2026, 17:42 UTC≈17,900 viewsread 2 September 2026

Por cierto, que se me ha olvidado decirles que como ya he hecho el programa en LocactivaRadio no habrá directo, entiendo que las dudas están resueltas. Son las 20:00, veo que no hay dudas así que voy a descansar que llevo una semana dura y el domingo tengo otra guardia. Un abrazo a todos!

8 May 2026, 11:35 UTC≈16,600 viewsread 2 September 2026
File

Hoy en LocactivaRadio hablamos de la epidemia de falta de vivienda, trabajadores pobres, condiciones de trabajo lamentables y, de paso, de la última filfa que han sacado para tapar todo lo anterior: El Hantavirus. Durante el programa podremos escuchar un fragmento de mi buen amigo y compañero @DrLuisMiguelBenito

8 May 2026, 08:09 UTC≈11,800 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

¿A qué hora les viene mejor el directo de hoy sobre conceptos técnicos del hantavirus y la repercusión político-mediática del incidente del barco?

  1. 17:3013%
  2. 18:008%
  3. 18:307%
  4. 19:0016%
  5. 19:309%
  6. 20:0053%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DrAlarcos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 May 2026, 08:09 UTCAnonymous Poll405 voters

¿A qué hora les viene mejor el directo de hoy sobre conceptos técnicos del hantavirus y la repercusión político-mediática del incidente del barco?

  1. 17:3013%
  2. 18:008%
  3. 18:307%
  4. 19:0016%
  5. 19:309%
  6. 20:0053%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Natalia Prego Cancelo MD, Dra, oficial Canal de difusión
@DraNataliaPrego · 24,594
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
HealthBest Juan Zaragoza
@healthbest · 36,653
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
Akasha Comunidad
@akashacomunidad · 49,959
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
LIBERUM ASOCIACION
@liberumasociscion · 38,102
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr Alarcos” (@DrAlarcos), 11,734 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrAlarcos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.