Les dejo este vídeo con la triste realidad de España y el enlace directo al mismo. https://youtu.be/nLhiMWeG-W8?is

Channel
Dr Alarcos
@DrAlarcos
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,612subscribers
-221 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001219469414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrAlarcos |
| Created | 10 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrAlarcos |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:56 | 11,612 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:39 | 11,613 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:01 | 11,617 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:58 | 11,621 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:29 | 11,625 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:01 | 11,628 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 11,633 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:02 | 11,634 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 11,636 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:48 | 11,639 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:01 | 11,643 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 11,646 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:01 | 11,648 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 11,652 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 11,654 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 11,657 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 11,660 | -4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 11,664 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:09 | 11,667 | -4 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:25 | 11,671 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 65.5%
- avg views ÷ 11,612 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,610
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (31 January 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 22,830 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 18:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 21s
- Average length
- 1m 11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://x.com/A_Alarcos/status/2108080410466861136
Buenas tardes. Les informo que el MCRC (Movimiento de Ciudadanos hacia la República Constitucional) facilitará eludir la obligación de acudir a la mesa electoral y, de esa manera, no tener que participar en la estafa masiva convocada para sostener este sistema vomitivo. Sólo tienen que, en caso de que les llegue la carta con la que les pretenderán obligar a echar el domingo para mayor gloria de los políticos corrup…
Les dejo un hilo sobre las posibles consecuencias médicas de la violencia policial extrema y desproporcionada ejercida sobre un detenido en la manifestación de ayer, no en apoyo a la indiscutible españolidad de Ceuta, sino en repulsa al abandono que están sufriendo los ceutíes por parte del Estado. https://x.com/A_Alarcos/status/2095532292156309574
¿Se acuerdan de esto de febrero?: https://x.com/i/status/2018344314523238906 Pues seguimos exactamente igual.
https://x.com/i/status/2082781878193389904
https://x.com/i/status/2082778926825251082
Sé que están ustedes cansados y desilusionados, pero si no se depuran responsabilidades sólo queda esperar hasta la próxima, tal como vaticinó esta canción cuando se publicó en 2013: https://youtu.be/BPuMqc_xGqU?is Sólo pagarán si exigimos que paguen. Sólo si pagan evitaremos que lo vuelvan a hacer. No hay más alternativas.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/ La Casa Blanca admite por escrito: 1⃣ Que el SARS-CoV-2 se generó en un laboratorio con una probabilidad altísima. 2⃣ Que todas las COVID19 en humanos parten de un mismo "paciente cero" que probablemente se infectó en el instituto de Virología de Wuhan. 3⃣ Que no existía (ni existe) evidencia científica que avale el uso de las mascarillas. 4⃣ Que no e…
Un abrazo desde mi guardia a los argentinos y enhorabuena a todos los españoles. ⭐️⭐️
EMPIEZA el BLANQUEAMIENTO POLÍTICO de la DANA culpando de la tragedia al Cambio Climático y su agresividad: https://youtu.be/zHOHXA1gCoc?is=82E_DCXqfXOqUfod
¿Qué tal el Hantavirus?
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @DrAlarcos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿A qué hora les viene mejor el directo de hoy sobre conceptos técnicos del hantavirus y la repercusión político-mediática del incidente del barco?
- 17:3013%
- 18:008%
- 18:307%
- 19:0016%
- 19:309%
- 20:0053%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@BeaTalegonOficial · 14,0572 postsperfilfalsooficial
@PerfilFalsoOficial · 11 postSanta Paciencia Podcast - (Antivacunas Info)
@antivacunas · 1,5341 post⚔️ Contra Anglo-Sionismo Geo Matrix >>>
@contrainformacionmatrix · 2531 postGuerreros Estoicos 🏹
@guerrerosestoicos · 37,8161 postKasny's
@kasnys · 7881 postMÉDICOS POR LA VERDAD España (Oficial)
@medicosporlaverdadESP · 12,8051 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DraNataliaPrego · 24,413
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
@healthbest · 36,487
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
@akashacomunidad · 49,375
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@liberumasociscion · 37,704
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr Alarcos” (@DrAlarcos), 11,612 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrAlarcos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.