Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ارشيف الأدعية

Channel

ارشيف الأدعية

@Duaas_21

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,685subscribers

-110 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437778098
TypeChannel
Username@Duaas_21
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Duaas_21

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Duaas_21/15640 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC@alhawraazinab/594965 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@Duaas_21/15642 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC@alhawraazinab/594995 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@alulbayt_14masom/93945 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC@Duaas_21/15640 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC1.004 minutes
@alulbayt_14masom/93975 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC@Duaas_21/15642 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC1.003 minutes
@Duaas_21/15640 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC@althaqalain21/978575 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@Duaas_21/15642 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC@althaqalain21/978625 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@alhawraazinab7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@alhawraazinab (61)
@alulbayt_14masom7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutes@alulbayt_14masom (61)
@althaqalain217 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@althaqalain21 (61)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @alhawraazinab. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,6855,7955,7406 August 2026 — 5,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,795 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,786 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,772 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,762 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,748 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,737 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,740 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,733 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,722 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,720 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,705 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,699 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,685 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,669–5,812 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:195,685-14
12 Sept 2026, 13:405,699-6
8 Sept 2026, 16:155,705-15
3 Sept 2026, 13:585,720-2
30 Aug 2026, 21:235,722-11
27 Aug 2026, 22:125,733-7
25 Aug 2026, 01:585,740+3
21 Aug 2026, 14:095,737-11
18 Aug 2026, 13:355,748-14
15 Aug 2026, 05:355,762-10
12 Aug 2026, 07:275,772-14
9 Aug 2026, 08:135,786-9
6 Aug 2026, 03:325,795no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:225,795first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 80 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 46 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8780.6%
💔1110.2%
👍109.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🍃 زيارة الامام صاحب الزمان عجل الله تعالى فرجه الشريف ⏬ما يزار به مولانا صاحب الزمان (صلوت الله وسلامه عليه) كلّ يوم بعد صلاة الفجر وهي: 🍃اللهُمَّ بَلِّغ مَولايَ صاحِبَ الزَّمانِ (صلوات الله عليه) عَن جَمِيعِ المُؤمِنِينَ وَالمُؤمِناتِ في مَشارِقِ الأرضِ وَمَغارِبِها وَبَرِّها وَبَحرِها وَسَهلِها وَجَبَلِها، حَيِّهِم وَمَيِّتِهِم وَعَن وَالِدَيَّ وَوُلدي وَعَنّي مِنَ الصَّلَواتِ وَالتَّحياتِ زِنَةَ عَرشِ اللهِ وَمِ

1💔1

12 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🍃 أعمال يوم الاربعاء https://t.me/Duaas_21/8499 👈 انقر على العنوان للانتقال إلى القراءة أن الاستماع إلى الفقرة🍃🍃 🍃 دعاء الزهراء عليها السلام 🍃 زيارة اليوم 🍃 دعاء اليوم 🍃 عوذة اليوم 🍃 تسبيح اليوم 🍃 الصلوات على الأئمة عليهم السلام 🍃 صلوات اليوم 🍃 صلاة الطاهرة فاطمة عليها السلام 🍃 العهد الثابت 🍃 ثواب الاموات 🍃 ذخيرة الآخرة 🍃 ثواب إلى آل الله 🍃صلاة لقضاء الحوائج 🍃 هدية إلى أمام زماننا عج

💔2

11 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @alulbayt_14masomSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

11 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC151 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @alulbayt_14masomPhoto

🔴 سلسلة محاضرات تأريخية بعنوان سورة #ابو_طالب كهف النبي صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم 🟥 تقديم #الاستاذ_محمد_سلمان_زاير ⭕️انقر على العنوان و انتقل للاستماع الى الدرس القرآني⤵️ ١٠ الدين السماوي توقيفي او اجتهادي؟ ٢. عبد مناف و ذريته ٣. بدعة القوم الحُمس ٤. ابو طالب في الروايات ٥. من هو أبو طالب؟ ٦. بعض آباء الصحابة ٧. لامية أبي طالب ٨. وفاة ابو طالب و وصيته ٩. اكذوبة الضحضاح ١٠. أدلة إيمان أبي طالب

1

11 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🏴 بوي يودعك دمع عيوني ياريت وياك يدفنوني عظم الله لكِ الأجر يا مولاتي يا زهراء باستشهاد سفينة الهدى صلى الله عليه و آله و سلم نهدي مولاتنا ثواب الأعمال التالية: ● ١٠ مرات سورة الكوثر المباركة ● ١٠٠ مرة صلوات ● مرة واحدة سبحة الزهراء عليها السلام

💔1

11 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @alHawraaZeinabVideo

#اعلان مسابقة #حملة_حفظ_دعاء_العهد ▫️ انطلاقا من قول الإمام الصادق (عليه السلام): (من دعا إلى الله تعالى أربعين صباحاً بهذا العهد -أي دعاء العهد- كان من أنصار قائمنا...) ▫️ وسعيا منا لترسيخ ما روي عن أهل البيت عليهم السلام في الأذان، يعلن مركز الحوراء زينب عليها السلام التابع للأمانة العامة للعتبة الحسينية المقدسة عن إقامة مسابقة لحفظ دعاء العهد لكافة اعمار الذكور والإناث. ▫️ وتم تخصيص مبلغ قدره عشرون مليون دينار

👍5

11 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC101 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🍃 زيارة الجامعة الصغيرة رابط الزيارة الصوتي🍃 https://t.me/Duaas_21/11715 🍃اَلسَّلامُ عَلى أَوْلِياءِ اللهِ وَأَصْفِيَائِهِ . اَلسَّلامُ عَلى أُمَناءِ اللهِ وَأَحِبَّائِهِ . اَلسَّلامُ عَلى أَنْصارِ اللهِ وَخُلَفائِهِ . اَلسَّلامُ عَلى مَحالِّ مَعْرِفَةِ اللهِ . اَلسَّلامُ عَلى مَساكِنِ ذِكْرِ اللهِ . اَلسَّلامُ عَلى مُظْهِرِي أَمْرِ اللهِ وَنَهْيِهِ . اَلسَّلامُ عَلَى الدُّعاةِ إِلَى اللهِ . اَلسَّلامُ عَلَى المُس

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @Duaas_21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

حَمْلَة عَمُودَ الدِّين

  1. 👤90%
  2. 👤👤5%
  3. 👤👤👤5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

#حملة سَائِرِ الأَشْرَافِ

  1. 👤79%
  2. 👤 👤3%
  3. 👤 👤 👤0%
  4. 👤 👤 👤 👤0%
  5. 👤 👤 👤 👤 👤17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

#حملة سَائِرِ الأَشْرَافِ

  1. 👤 👤0%
  2. 👤 👤 👤0%
  3. 👤 👤 👤 👤0%
  4. 👤 👤 👤 👤 👤0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

#حملة سَائِرِ الأَشْرَافِ

  1. 👤83%
  2. 👤 👤13%
  3. 👤 👤 👤13%
  4. 👤 👤 👤 👤7%
  5. 👤 👤 👤 👤 👤10%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

#حملة سَائِرِ الأَشْرَافِ

  1. 👤92%
  2. 👤 👤13%
  3. 👤 👤 👤8%
  4. 👤 👤 👤 👤17%
  5. 👤 👤 👤 👤 👤13%

The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

#حملة سَائِرِ الأَشْرَافِ

  1. 👤86%
  2. 👤 👤11%
  3. 👤 👤 👤11%
  4. 👤 👤 👤 👤11%
  5. 👤 👤 👤 👤 👤14%

The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

عالم👘 الـ ج ـمـال 👜
@gmalll · 51,464
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
بالقرآن 𓂆 نهتدي•°(؏ العهد مڪملين)
@GANTK3 · 22,779
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ارشيف الأدعية” (@Duaas_21), 5,685 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Duaas_21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.