Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دروس عسكرية للمجاهدين

Channel

دروس عسكرية للمجاهدين

@DuroosAskariya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,122subscribers

+722 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002349928103
TypeChannel
Username@DuroosAskariya
Descriptionقناة تهتم بنشر كل ما يخص العلوم العسكرية بشكل عام و العلوم التي تُفيد المجاهدين بشكل خاص الإعداد العسكري أمر رباني يقول تعالى ﴿ وَأَعِدُّوا لَهُم مَّا اسْتَطَعْتُم مِّن قُوَّةٍ وَمِن رِّبَاطِ الْخَيْلِ ﴾ لـ الإشتـراگ بقناتنا (ج.ن)👈🏼( @JidarNari )
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DuroosAskariya

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,40010,1229,7616 August 2026 — 9,400 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,402 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,467 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,470 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,661 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,712 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,755 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,787 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,788 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,793 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,808 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,814 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,826 subscribers1 October 2026 — 9,896 subscribers8 October 2026 — 9,887 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,948 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,989 subscribers19 October 2026 — 9,992 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,991 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,985 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,975 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,979 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,992 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,089 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,115 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,122 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net +722. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,292–10,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 08:0110,122+7
7 Nov 2026, 01:4710,115+26
6 Nov 2026, 03:1610,089+97
3 Nov 2026, 04:269,992+13
30 Oct 2026, 21:089,979+4
28 Oct 2026, 01:079,975-10
24 Oct 2026, 23:389,985-6
22 Oct 2026, 07:219,991-1
19 Oct 2026, 10:559,992+3
16 Oct 2026, 09:469,989+41
13 Oct 2026, 14:279,948+61
8 Oct 2026, 02:379,887-9
1 Oct 2026, 17:219,896+70
16 Sept 2026, 15:599,826+12
12 Sept 2026, 14:409,814+6
8 Sept 2026, 02:389,808+15
2 Sept 2026, 21:559,793+5
30 Aug 2026, 10:289,788+1
27 Aug 2026, 00:249,787+32
23 Aug 2026, 14:159,755first reading

Engagement

115 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 10,122 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 115 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held115 (26 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total83,826
Reactions total1,008
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 22:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈257
Videos
≈1,510
Links
≈2,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 44m
Average length
3m 55s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,052 reactions across 115 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,79944.4%
👍1,47736.5%
🔥41810.3%
🫡1904.69%
🤣872.15%
🕊541.33%
👌70.173%
💯50.123%
⚡40.099%
👎40.099%
🙏40.099%
🤔20.049%
😢10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,052 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 115 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DuroosAskariya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 115 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (27.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 19:14 UTC520 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

الرشاش الروسي عيار 14.5 ملم.. وحش الميدان وقوة الردع المضاعفة #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

❤6🫡5👍3

8 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC886 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026

قصيدة رائعة للشاعر الرائع محمد عبد الكريم النعمي ؛ t.me/moacvzjakav تابعوا قناته #يستحق

👍3❤2

7 Nov 2026, 19:49 UTC≈1,240 views37 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

تعلم كيف تقود دبابة 🛰 #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

👍33❤4

7 Nov 2026, 18:24 UTC≈1,320 views29 reactionsread 8 November 2026

يخرج من تحت الغارة كانه اسد لا تهزه غارات الاعداء بل هو فوق الغارة رباطة جأش وثبات انفعالي عظيم هذا هو الجيل الذي سوف يحرر ارض الحرمين من الاحتلال السعودي الغاشم #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

❤16🫡12😢1

7 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,470 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

🗒 كتاب | التصدي لخـطر المسيرات #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

❤8👍1

7 Nov 2026, 05:07 UTC≈1,630 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

📸الطيران السعودي يستهدف تحشيداته.. مشاهد كهبوب المنشورة مؤخراً ولقطات الساحل الغربي التي تُعرض لأول مرة تقدم ما يجب أن يراه ويعرفه كل يمني - #تقرير #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

🔥13❤4👍1

6 Nov 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,640 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

#كيف يتم تٌطِبيَقُ تكتيكات الدفاع السلبي ضد التهديدات الجوية؟ #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

❤14👍4

6 Nov 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,820 views44 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

تسلل صامت يباغت العدو من مسافة صفر انتهى بالسيطرة على رأس قمة سلسلة من جبال كهبوب الاستراتيجي من مشاهد سلسلة جبال كهبوب الاستراتيجية - 6نوفمبر 2026م #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

❤36🔥6👍1🫡1

6 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,670 views20 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

📸 مشاهد نوعية من العمليات الواسعة لطرد التحشيدات التابعة للعدو السعودي بقيادة الضابط السعودي بدر الحربي من عدد من المواقع في سلسلة جبال كهبوب الاستراتيجية شرق باب المندب - 6 نوفمبر 2026م #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

❤14👍3🔥2🫡1

6 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,540 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🏅 قائمة الشرف: تحية إجلال لشركاء النجاح. 🏅 🗂 نُقدم لكم قائمة القنوات التي كانت سنداً وعوناً لنا، والتي ساهمت بفاعلية في إثراء قناتنا ودعم رسالتنا. هذه القنوات هي عماد التفاعل وشركاء النجاح الذين نعتز بهم ونقدر جهودهم الجبارة. _ مؤسسة جهاد الثقافية ؛ t.me/jehadyeorg _ محمد عبدالكريم النعمي ؛ t.me/moacvzjakav _ منصة اتقان الثقافية ؛ t.me/ItqanCultural _المنشد علي الديلمي ؛ https://t.me/ail_al_dailami _ قناة زوامل عيسى…

🫡9❤4👍1

6 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,560 views11 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

#كيف يتم استخدام التمويه، لتحديد الهدف ومباغتته في الميدان ؟ #وأعدوا_لهم #دروس_عسكرية_للمجاهدين 🔗 https://t.me/DuroosAskariya

❤9👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @DuroosAskariya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DuroosAskariya edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @DuroosAskariya as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
25 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz589 voters

ما المقصود بـ ( مسرح العمليات ) في المفهوم العسكري؟

  1. أ) مكان إقامة الجنود فقط.2%
  2. ب) المنطقة الجغرافية التي تجري فيها العمليات العسكرية أو تُخطط لها.96%
  3. ج) مركز الاتصالات وحده.2%
  4. د) منطقة تخزين المعدات فقط.1%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

جبهة الوعـي✌🏼
@Kaian_Kowkabah · 6,462
5 posts
أثر
@Athar_Idea · 2,659
3 posts
محمد عبدالكريم النعمي
@moacvzjakav · 345
2 posts
إذاعة سام 2 ( برامج و ترويجات ) www.samyemen.fm
@SAMredio · 2,100
2 posts
كتابات علي صومل
@a7l733i · 2,292
1 post
عبدالله عبدالوهاب العوامي
@Abdullahalawami · 1,447
1 post
المنشد علي الديلمي Ali Al-Dailami
@ail_al_dailami · 275
1 post
شبكة اليقين
@AliyaqinNet · 10,908
1 post
قناة المصمم مرعب الاعداء
@AlmeyedIn · 4,149
1 post
قناة القاضي عبدالفتاح غلاب
@alqady_abdalfatah_galab · 5,719
1 post
عين اليقين
@AuyinAliyaqin · 3,557
1 post
معركة الـوعـي
@Axis_Truth_Book · 1,602
1 post
توعية أمنية | شروحات تقنية
@cyber_almot · 13,731
1 post
❌قاطع 🇺🇸🇮🇱 Boycott❌
@HNNet1 · 1,613
1 post
حسن داود عامر
@Hsan_Dawd · 10,032
1 post
مؤسسة جهاد الثقافية التعبوية
@jehadyeorg · 12,496
1 post
🍃»رؤيَة..👁‍🗨
@OneYemenVision · 3,210
1 post
༄ ميـدان 𓂆 قـرآن ࿐
@QURAAN_MAIDAN · 4,108
1 post
مكتبة الثقافة القرآنية
@Quran_Library_ye · 4,264
1 post
صادق قباص
@sadeq223sadeg · 1,979
1 post
حروف مبعثرة
@Thewoundedhomeland · 799
1 post
قناة زوامل جلسات جهادية
@Too00l · 24,968
1 post
قناة زوامل عيسى اليث2026
@zwamelalleth · 227,534
1 post
قناة زوامل عيسى الليث 2026
@zwamlAllaitw · 133,966
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دروس عسكرية للمجاهدين” (@DuroosAskariya), 10,122 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DuroosAskariya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.