Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дядюшка Скрудж(Vlad1k)

Channel

Дядюшка Скрудж(Vlad1k)

@DyadushkaScrooge

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,892subscribers

-462 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002508047024
TypeChannel
Username@DyadushkaScrooge
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 21 June 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DyadushkaScrooge

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,89212,35412,1237 August 2026 — 12,354 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,353 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,335 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,326 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,319 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,311 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,303 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,296 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,290 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,281 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,269 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,252 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,247 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,242 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,233 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,218 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,212 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,196 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,190 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,175 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,169 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,152 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,143 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,124 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,121 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,108 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,098 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,977 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,951 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,930 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,918 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,901 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,892 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -462. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,823–12,423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:5711,892-9
16 Sept 2026, 20:1611,901-17
14 Sept 2026, 22:4011,918-12
13 Sept 2026, 06:5611,930-21
11 Sept 2026, 12:5811,951-26
8 Sept 2026, 17:2011,977-121
5 Sept 2026, 10:1812,098-10
3 Sept 2026, 16:1712,108-13
2 Sept 2026, 12:3312,121-3
1 Sept 2026, 15:3412,124-19
31 Aug 2026, 17:5712,143-9
30 Aug 2026, 20:3612,152-17
29 Aug 2026, 18:3512,169-6
28 Aug 2026, 20:3312,175-15
27 Aug 2026, 18:5312,190-6
26 Aug 2026, 17:3412,196-16
25 Aug 2026, 15:5312,212-6
24 Aug 2026, 13:4812,218-15
22 Aug 2026, 20:1212,233-9
21 Aug 2026, 10:0412,242first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

593 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22337.6%
🔥15125.5%
😁8915.0%
👍437.25%
🤯366.07%
🎉172.87%
🏆132.19%
❤‍🔥111.85%
👏81.35%
🥰20.337%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 593 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2025 to 10 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DyadushkaScrooge. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2025 to 10 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Oct 2025, 17:45 UTC≈3,670 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Куплю аккаунты со статуэтками предложения в лс - @xean1t

❤6

10 Oct 2025, 15:36 UTC≈3,910 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

куплю у вас фигурку дурова предложения в лс - @xean1t @DyadushkaScrooge

❤3🥰2😁1

19 Jul 2025, 22:03 UTC≈7,330 views38 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @PalaceNFTPhoto

🪙 Huuuge news for today’s night! 🐸 We’ve rebuilt the core of Palace — this is the first step in a major update cycle. New wallet system Connect your main wallet via TON Connect. Deposits and withdrawals are now lightning-fast and more reliable. Account activity history Track all your actions: buys, deposits, withdrawals, and more — finally! Partner integrations Access holders chats via @stickers_holders_bot, get …

🔥15👍13❤10

9 Jul 2025, 19:58 UTC≈7,870 views75 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🫠Скупили за секунды, после уведомления от гифт детектора зашел в подарки и их уже не было в наличии @DyadushkaScrooge

❤53🔥13🤯9

9 Jul 2025, 19:37 UTC≈6,920 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⬆️ Подарки сегодня? В описании под клипом Snoop Dogg заметили фразу «Gifts OUT NOW», что переводится как «Уже доступно или Уже вышло». Возможно, Старина Снуп выложил клип раньше положенного времени. 🎁 @GiftNews • Buy/Sell Gifts

❤10🔥6🤯4

5 Jul 2025, 19:38 UTC≈7,520 views73 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🫠 Крупнейший telegram бот для авто-скупки подарков удалён владельцем @AutoGiftsBot - вернул большую часть звезд клиентам и завершил существование проекта @DyadushkaScrooge

😁50🤯22👍1

4 Jul 2025, 18:54 UTC≈5,320 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @PalaceNFTPhoto

To the Moonbirds 🚀 🏴 Buy on Palace

😁30❤5🔥5🎉2

2 Jul 2025, 14:53 UTC≈6,360 views48 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Судя по всему Telegram подгружает новые подарки Возможно готовятся ко дню Америки, 4 Июля @DyadushkaScrooge

❤21🔥15😁7🎉4🤯1

30 Jun 2025, 10:40 UTC≈5,200 views28 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @sticker_communityVideo

Sticker Pack Upgraded 😎 What's new: 💎 Join launches with your TON wallet 🤝 Fair sale via raffle among participants (one pack per user) 🕵️ Cut off scripts and empty accounts ⚡ Trading starts immediately after the launch With that, al deposit transactions will be traceable on-chain. There is no advantage to being fast (bye, scripts), while real users will have more chances and enough time to join. You can try it with…

❤14👍6🔥6👏2

29 Jun 2025, 09:23 UTC≈5,470 views37 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚀 На Palace и других маркетах уже начали откупать большинство стикеров перед завтрашним MINT, ведь в таймере осталось чуть более суток Рост за последние дни на многие из коллекций составил ~ от 30 до 100% @DyadushkaScrooge

🔥17❤11🎉5👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DyadushkaScrooge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дядюшка Скрудж(Vlad1k)” (@DyadushkaScrooge), 11,892 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DyadushkaScrooge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.