Channel
@EFhistory
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,924subscribers
-259 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001184642231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EFhistory |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EFhistory |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 12,924 | -18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 12,942 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 12,945 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 12,953 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 12,956 | -20 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 12,976 | -13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 12,989 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 12,997 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:45 | 13,008 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:49 | 13,018 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 13,021 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 13,036 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 13,041 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 13,052 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 13,059 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 13,069 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 13,073 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 13,078 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 13,089 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 13,100 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 31 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
👆LAST WEEK: +2,750 PIPS✅ 👉 MONDAY +340pips 👉 TUESDAY +440pips 👉 WEDNESDAY +530pips 👉 THURSDAY +740pips 👉 FRIDAY +700pips LOTS / PROFIT ➡️ 0.01lot = $270 profit ➡️ 0.10lot = $2,700 profit ➡️ 1.00lot = $27,000 profit 🗣Clients Feedbacks: T.me/EasyForexPipsTestimonials 4+ YEARS HISTORY: T.ME/EFHISTORY ⭐️⭐️⭐️Become a VIP member => https://easyforexpips.com
Monday 19/05/2025 closed trades: EURJPY SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPUSD SELL TP +50 pips✅ EURUSD SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPCAD SELL TP +50 pips✅ GBPUSD SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPCAD SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPUSD SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPJPY SELL TP +20 pips✅ EURCHF BUY TP +20 pips✅ EURJPY SELL TP +100 pips✅ Tuesday 20/05/2025 closed trades: EURUSD SELL TP +20 pips✅ EURUSD SELL TP +50 pips✅ GBPJPY SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ …
👆LAST WEEK: +3,420 PIPS✅ 👉 MONDAY +510pips 👉 TUESDAY +560pips 👉 WEDNESDAY +900pips 👉 THURSDAY +820pips 👉 FRIDAY +690pips LOTS / PROFIT ➡️ 0.01lot = $340 profit ➡️ 0.10lot = $3,400 profit ➡️ 1.00lot = $34,000 profit 🗣Clients Feedbacks: T.me/EasyForexPipsTestimonials 4+ YEARS HISTORY: T.ME/EFHISTORY ⭐️⭐️⭐️Become a VIP member => https://easyforexpips.com
Monday 12/05/2025 closed trades: USDCAD SELL TP +20 pips✅ USDCAD SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPUSD BUY TP +20 pips✅ EURUSD BUY TP +20 pips✅ GBPJPY BUY TP +20 pips✅ EURUSD SELL TP +150 pips✅ AUDUSD SELL TP +100 pips✅ EURJPY SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPJPY SELL TP +20 pips✅ GBPUSD BUY TP +20 pips✅ USDCAD BUY TP +100 pips✅ USDCAD BUY TP +100 pips✅ Tuesday 13/05/2025 closed trades: GBPJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ GBPJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ GB…
👆LAST WEEK: +3,110 PIPS✅ 👉 MONDAY +740pips 👉 TUESDAY +570pips 👉 WEDNESDAY +520pips 👉 THURSDAY +670pips 👉 FRIDAY +670pips LOTS / PROFIT ➡️ 0.01lot = $310 profit ➡️ 0.10lot = $3,100 profit ➡️ 1.00lot = $31,000 profit 🗣Clients Feedbacks: T.me/EasyForexPipsTestimonials 4+ YEARS HISTORY: T.ME/EFHISTORY ⭐️⭐️⭐️Become a VIP member => https://easyforexpips.com
Monday 05/05/2025 closed trades: GBPJPY SELL TP +100 pips✅ AUDUSD BUY TP +100 pips✅ AUDUSD BUY TP +100 pips✅ GBPJPY SELL TP +100 pips✅ GBPUSD SELL TP +50 pips✅ EURUSD SELL TP +50 pips✅ EURJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ EURJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ GBPJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ EURJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ GBPUSD SELL TP +20 pips✅ EURUSD SELL TP +20 pips✅ Tuesday 06/05/2025 closed trades: GBPJPY SELL TP +50 pips✅ USDCAD BUY TP +20 pips✅…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @EFhistory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EFP History” (@EFhistory), 12,924 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EFhistory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.