Channel
@ENARM2022gratis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,989subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001689408735 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ENARM2022gratis |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 December 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ENARM2022gratis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 10,989 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:46 | 10,991 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:52 | 10,986 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:28 | 10,989 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 10,993 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 10,996 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 10,997 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 11,000 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 11,003 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 11,002 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,002 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
¿Cuál es el diagnóstico?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Cuál es la probable técnica quirúrgica ORL a realizar si recidiva esta enfermedad?.
CASO CLÍNICO 3⃣: Paciente masculino, de 20 años de edad, raza blanca. Con antecedentes de amigdalitis aguda diagnosticada hace 6 días y tratada con Cefalexina , pero su evolución no es satisfactoria porque acude hoy a consulta refiriendo fiebre de 39°C, odinofagia derecha intensa, otalgia derecha, trismus e inclinación de la cabeza hacia el lado derecho. Al examen físico, se observa aumento de volumen inflamatorio s…
¿Cuál es el diagnóstico?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
CASO CLÍNICO 2⃣: Lactante, masculino, de 11 meses de edad. Es traído a consulta porque presenta manifestaciones catarrales de 2 días en evolución, anoche presentó fiebre de 40°C, obstrucción nasal, rinorrea purulenta bilateral, ronquidos nocturnos y anorexia. Al examen físico ORL presenta en la rinoscopia anterior rinorrea purulenta bilateral con estrías de sangre y congestión de la mucosa nasal.
¿Cuál es el diagnóstico?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Sticker, posted without a caption
CASO CLÍNICO 1⃣: Paciente femenina, blanca, de 25 años de edad. Antecedentes de sepsis en el 2do y 3er molares inferiores derechos. Acude a consulta refiriendo odinafagia unilateral derecha, halitosis y febrícula de 4 días en evolución. Al examen físico ORL se observa úlcera anfractuosa en amígdala palatina derecha y adenopatía inflamatoria satélite en región cervical lateral derecha.
https://t.me/MedicArte
Estadios de la Sarcoidosis
Precisa tratamiento la sarcoidosis extratorácica y pulmonar en estadío 2-3 con síntomas moderados-graves o progresivos, o con cambios en la radiografía de tórax. No se trata la sarcoidosis en estadío 1. El tratamiento se basa en la administración de corticoides orales (20-40 mgr de prednisona/d). La respuesta se evalúa tras 1-3 meses, de forma que si es positiva, se disminuye la dosis gradualmente hasta una dosis de…
🔺Ante la sospecha de sarcoidosis, ha de derivarse al paciente a la consulta especializada para confirmar el diagnóstico, estadiar la enfermedad y establecer el tratamiento apropiado. Dos tercios de los pacientes presentan resolución espontánea, y el resto evolucionan crónicamente, ya sea de forma activa o con recidivas periódicas. Según el patrón radiológico, se pueden establecer 4 estadíos que van a determinar la e…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ENARM2022gratis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Cuál es el diagnóstico?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Cuál es el diagnóstico?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Cuál es el diagnóstico?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ante la sospecha de Eritema Nodoso, ¿cuál cree usted que sea la causa más probable?
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2021 to 23 December 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENARM Material Gratis” (@ENARM2022gratis), 10,989 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ENARM2022gratis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.