Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЭПОХА ДЕРЗКИХ

Channel

ЭПОХА ДЕРЗКИХ

@EPOHA_DERZKIH

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,682subscribers

-2,149 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002037886653
TypeChannel
Username@EPOHA_DERZKIH
Description🔥СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВО лс - @Reutov_KPZ 🔥ССЫЛКА ДЛЯ ДРУГА https://t.me/EPOHA_DERZKIH 🔥ЭПОХА ЧАТ - https://t.me/EPOHADERZKIH_CHAT
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/EPOHA_DERZKIH

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

34,68236,83135,756.57 August 2026 — 36,831 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,808 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,776 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,750 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,714 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,681 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,655 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,605 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,555 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,521 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,482 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,462 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,438 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,415 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,363 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,337 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,419 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,399 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,396 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,372 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,364 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,333 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,306 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,279 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,293 subscribers3 September 2026 — 36,254 subscribers5 September 2026 — 36,220 subscribers9 September 2026 — 36,179 subscribers11 September 2026 — 36,268 subscribers13 September 2026 — 36,301 subscribers15 September 2026 — 36,270 subscribers17 September 2026 — 36,204 subscribers19 September 2026 — 36,131 subscribers26 September 2026 — 35,963 subscribers4 October 2026 — 35,717 subscribers9 October 2026 — 35,549 subscribers13 October 2026 — 35,427 subscribers14 October 2026 — 35,366 subscribers15 October 2026 — 35,292 subscribers16 October 2026 — 35,262 subscribers17 October 2026 — 35,232 subscribers18 October 2026 — 35,195 subscribers19 October 2026 — 35,161 subscribers20 October 2026 — 35,096 subscribers21 October 2026 — 35,026 subscribers23 October 2026 — 34,971 subscribers23 October 2026 — 34,946 subscribers24 October 2026 — 34,913 subscribers25 October 2026 — 34,888 subscribers26 October 2026 — 34,858 subscribers27 October 2026 — 34,875 subscribers28 October 2026 — 34,876 subscribers30 October 2026 — 34,852 subscribers31 October 2026 — 34,830 subscribers1 November 2026 — 34,803 subscribers2 November 2026 — 34,777 subscribers3 November 2026 — 34,768 subscribers4 November 2026 — 34,741 subscribers5 November 2026 — 34,714 subscribers6 November 2026 — 34,682 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -2,149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,360–37,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:1934,682-32
5 Nov 2026, 07:2834,714-27
4 Nov 2026, 06:4934,741-27
3 Nov 2026, 06:3934,768-9
2 Nov 2026, 07:2634,777-26
1 Nov 2026, 05:1834,803-27
31 Oct 2026, 02:0034,830-22
30 Oct 2026, 02:3834,852-24
28 Oct 2026, 23:5634,876+1
27 Oct 2026, 20:4434,875+17
26 Oct 2026, 18:5634,858-30
25 Oct 2026, 21:2834,888-25
24 Oct 2026, 20:4834,913-33
23 Oct 2026, 23:2734,946-25
23 Oct 2026, 01:1734,971-55
21 Oct 2026, 22:3835,026-70
20 Oct 2026, 15:2735,096-65
19 Oct 2026, 12:4535,161-34
18 Oct 2026, 12:0935,195-37
17 Oct 2026, 14:5935,232first reading

Engagement

1,014 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 202 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.67%
avg views ÷ 34,682 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,350
420 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.787%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
423
of 1,014 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 410 of 420 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held1,014 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total1,408,367
Reactions total10,825
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,350
Videos
≈3,310
Links
≈4,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 124 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

32,417 reactions across 969 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣19,79361.1%
🔥4,21513.0%
❤3,64411.2%
😁1,8455.69%
👍9933.06%
😱4541.40%
😈2890.892%
🎃2800.864%
🤔2450.756%
😡1760.543%
👏1680.518%
😐1550.478%
💯1360.42%
😢180.056%
⚡60.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 972 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
52
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 993 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EPOHA_DERZKIH. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 423 posts held from the last 30 days (4.02%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 18:48 UTC960 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

❗️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❗️ 🔥ПЕРЕЗАПУСК🔥 🔥УЖЕ НАЧАЛИ БУХАТЬ 🔥 🟡ВСЕ НА СТРИМ ГАЗЗЗЗЗЗЗ🟡 ▶️ЗАЛЕТАЙ▶️ 👇👇👇 📺СТРИМ ТУТ ➡️https://kick.com/epoha_derzkih

❤2😈2🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,330 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

ОБЗОР НА БАНЮ 📺СТРИМ БУДЕТ ТУТ ➡️https://kick.com/epoha_derzkih ✈️ССЫЛКА ДЛЯ ДРУГА - https://t.me/EPOHA_DERZKIH

🔥9❤2🤣2💯1

6 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC751 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @KPZYoyTubeVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥6❤4👏4

6 Nov 2026, 18:17 UTC715 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @KPZYoyTubeVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8❤3🤣1

6 Nov 2026, 18:17 UTC717 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @KPZYoyTubeVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8❤2🤣1

6 Nov 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,510 views134 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥71🤣27❤18👏5😁5👍3💯3😈2

6 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,740 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥17🎃4😈3❤1

6 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,810 views42 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

ЗАКУП С ВИТАЛЕЙ. ПОДГОТОВКА ИДЕТ ПОЛНЫМ ХОДОМ 📺СТРИМ БУДЕТ ТУТ ➡️https://kick.com/epoha_derzkih

❤21🎃10🔥7💯3👍1

6 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,990 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤15🤣10🔥5😈1

6 Nov 2026, 04:01 UTC≈3,740 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣22❤4🎃4🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC≈3,670 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣20❤6🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,014 posts we hold for @EPOHA_DERZKIH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@EPOHA_DERZKIH edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 59 posts on @EPOHA_DERZKIH as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
20

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Sept 2026, 02:42 UTCAnonymous Poll2,890 voters approx.

Меняем название канала с Epoha Derzkih на Freak house?

  1. ДА67%
  2. НЕТ34%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTCAnonymous Poll1,830 voters approx.

⁉️Как оцените работу Кащея⁉️

  1. Отлично11%
  2. Нормально13%
  3. Такое себе6%
  4. Ну пойдёт16%
  5. Хуета28%
  6. Лучшее бы вообще не приезжал,носатая бабка26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КТО ПО ЖИЗНИ
@KPZYoyTube · 68,772
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭПОХА ДЕРЗКИХ” (@EPOHA_DERZKIH), 34,682 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EPOHA_DERZKIH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.