ANY ONE WITH WHATSAPP BOT SERVERS CONTACT ME FOR BUSINESS π₯πͺπͺπͺπͺ 0746527403

Channel
E.S solutions πΊπ¬
@Eansensor1
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
4,995subscribers
-228 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001803173783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Eansensor1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2022 and 31 October 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Eansensor1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 4,995 | -19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 5,014 | -24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 5,038 | -37 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 5,075 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 5,097 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 5,119 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 5,136 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 5,150 | -16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 5,166 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 5,180 | -26 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 5,206 | -18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 5,224 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 5,223 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 30 | 46.2% | |
| π | 17 | 26.2% | |
| π | 7 | 10.8% | |
| π₯ | 6 | 9.23% | |
| π | 5 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Audio from Eansensor Eβ’S Solutions πΊπ¬
ποΈ ποΈ π π Welcome to New Apps π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ For personal accounts π π₯πͺπͺπͺπͺ 0746527403 Regards Eansensor ES solutions πΊπ¬
β€1
User Details Username : ANGELTUNNE Password : 22222 Subscription : normal
π3β€2
ANGEL TUNNEL VPN_11.apk
β€1
ANGEL TUNNEL VPN_1.apk
ποΈ ποΈ π π Welcome to New Apps π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ For personal accounts π π₯πͺπͺπͺπͺ 0746527403 Regards Eansensor ES solutions πΊπ¬
π3β€1
VPN udp unlock π Drop your Airtel phone number we do activation at 28k π₯πͺπͺπͺπͺ 0746527403 Regards Es solutions πΊπ¬
β€6π1
Zimbabwe Econet is Back
π1
good Working vpn * 1 ROBOT 5G SPEED PROπ¨ * 2 IPHONE SPEED PROπ¨ * 3 MY LOVE SPEED PRO π¨ * 4 DRAGON SPEED PRO π¨ * 5 TIGER SPEED PRO π¨ * 6 MEGA SPEED PROπ¨ * 7 KING SPEED PRO π¨ * 8 5G SPEED PRO π¨ β ACCOUNT INFORMATION β π€ USERNAME: 06664 π PASSWORD: 33221 π SUBSCRIPTION: Premium β³ EXPIRATION: 407121 seconds
β€7π₯1
VPN udp unlock π Drop your Airtel phone number we do activation at 28k Regards Es solutions πΊπ¬
π6π₯2β€1
The show begins now Now u can get connected without id photo or owner of id photo just only phone number π₯πͺπͺπͺπͺ 0746527403 Regards Eansensor Es solutions πΊπ¬
β€4π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Eansensor1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βE.S solutions πΊπ¬β (@Eansensor1), 4,995 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eansensor1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.