Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ANTIHYIP Trade. Управление капиталом💵💴💶💷

Channel

ANTIHYIP Trade. Управление капиталом💵💴💶💷

@EatFutures

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

674subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577567036
TypeChannel
Username@EatFutures
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EatFutures

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6746906827 August 2026 — 690 subscribers7 August 2026 — 690 subscribers15 August 2026 — 687 subscribers22 August 2026 — 682 subscribers29 August 2026 — 680 subscribers8 September 2026 — 676 subscribers17 September 2026 — 674 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 672–692 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:20674-2
8 Sept 2026, 12:21676-4
29 Aug 2026, 14:28680-2
22 Aug 2026, 23:27682-5
15 Aug 2026, 18:33687-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:33690no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:23690first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 19 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1821.7%
😁1315.7%
👎89.64%
👍67.23%
🥰67.23%
🤣44.82%
🔥33.61%
😭33.61%
🙏33.61%
⚡22.41%
🐳22.41%
👻22.41%
🕊22.41%
🤬22.41%
🌚11.20%
🍌11.20%
👀11.20%
👌11.20%
👏11.20%
👨‍💻11.20%
3 further kinds33.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC82 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️ТРАМП: СЕГОДНЯ МЫ ЖЕСТОКО УДАРИМ ПО ИРАНУ, НАША ОЧЕРЕДЬ

👍3🕊1🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Трамп кстати снова угрожает Ирану и вызывает рост нефтяных котировок,что равно росту инфляции в США Несите таблетки,а лучше дробовик

🥰3⚡1

29 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Трамп критиковал Пауэлла (главу ФРС США) за то,что тот не снижал ставку и говорил об инфляции,хотя инфляции по мнению Трампа не было Трамп меняет Пауэлла на Уорша Уорш в первый месяц главы ФРС : " Мы рассматриваем повышение ставок,ввиду риска роста инфляции из-за высоких нефтяных котировок" Всё,что нужно знать о Трампе

❤3🌚1

27 Jul 2026, 23:21 UTC100 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пост от 12 апреля оказался не шуткой,а пророчеством У нас только за сегодня -анонс переговоров -отмена переговоров -анонс переговоров Это ПИЗДЕЦ ❤️👌

❤1👌1🕊1

23 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC161 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что и требовалось доказать Трамп дал крипте вырасти на 10%,теперь он снова начинает обстреливать Иран,нефть Brent уже выше $100 СНОВА До объявления 347 победы в войне с Ираном и начале переговоров 3...2....1...

❤4👏1

21 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC145 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Крипторынок растёт,значит в ближайшие дни ждём снова вкидов от Трампа,просто смотрите что будет происходить дальше -срыв переговоров -новые торговые претензии к странам -разговоры "крипта это супер"

🔥3🐳1😁1

17 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC199 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Теория уже подтвердилась около шести раз Пока без сбоев,ночью США вновь били по Ирану

❤3🐳1

13 Jul 2026, 22:58 UTC243 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Два танкера атакованы в Ормузском проливе. Погиб член экипажа, еще восемь человек пострадали, сообщило Reuters.

😭2👀1

13 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC209 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Трамп официально уведомил конгресс о возобновлении боевых действий против Ирана Ну что,снова нефть по 100ке и инфляция в США на 40 летних максимумах? 👌

⚡1😭1

13 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC183 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Американский сорт нефти (WTI) Прямо сейчас тестирует поддержку, если США и Иран не договорятся и мы не пробьём "саппорт", то велика вероятность возвращения цены выше $100 за баррель

❤2

13 Jul 2026, 04:06 UTC151 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро,инвесторы👌😊

🤣4😁1

8 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC178 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1.5 года назад совершенно точно был определён хай по BTC на 120к Какой думаете будет следующий хай?

🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EatFutures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ANTIHYIP Trade. Управление капиталом💵💴💶💷” (@EatFutures), 674 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EatFutures.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.