Channel
@Editorial_burdock
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
357subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002102512144 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Editorial_burdock |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Editorial_burdock |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 357 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 356 | +8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 348 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 347 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 347 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
156 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 35.9% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 19.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 16.0% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 7.69% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 7.69% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 4.49% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 2.56% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 2.56% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 1.92% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.28% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжаю испытывать свои навыки геймдизайна. Позвольте представить — Лавка алхимика! Это тяжело назвать НРИ, наверное, больше подойдёт слово «головоломка», в которой вам потребуется путём математических вычислений и капли удачи изготавливать различные зелья привередливым покупателям. Попробуйте, если устали бесконечно листать ленту.
❤🔥8🔥3
Мы просто обязаны поделиться этим замечательным подкастом, потому что в нём обсуждается тема, которую нам тоже хотелось осветить. К счастью, «Сказки из темноты» нас опередили, и теперь у нас будет чуть меньше работы. Наслаждайтесь!
😁6❤4
⠀✨ 🌬️➿🩶 🪦🖤 🗡️🕸️ 🌟тличается ли игра, 🦇⚔️ подготовленная ГМ-ом женщиной, от игры мастера-мужчины? 🌟 если это игрок? Правда ли, что мужчины в хобби ищут крутых моментов и самопрезентации, пока девушки выжимают из сюжетов эмоции, любовь и драму? 🌫️🌫️🌫️🌙🌫️🌫️🌫️ 🌟летела в обсуждение всего этого и влюбила нас своей ⚔️лучезарной харизмой Оля, ⚔️не только мастер со стажем, но и создательница студенческого НРИ-клуба и фес…
❤7🔥6💅3
Вот и отгремел DiceFest IV, и пора подводить его итоги Мы поговорили с Дюной, организатором «главного ролевого фестиваля Петербурга», и узнали: — DiceFest I и DiceFest IV: что изменилось? — Кто дороже: работники за деньги или люди за идею? — Сколько можно заработать на фестивале? — Существует ли «фестивальный плагиат» и нужно ли с ним бороться? — Ждать ли DiceFest в Москве? И многое другое. 👉 читать 👈 Не буд…
🔥15❤7👍3🤝1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥6👍2🕊2
Кстати, вот и мнение участницы эпика, которая приехала в Питер аж из Саратова!
❤5👍2😁1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6🥰2👍1
Что о дайсфесте думают волонтёры? Уже узнали.
🥰5❤1👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6👍1
Тренинг: ролевиков учат умирать.
🤯4👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤9
Как прошёл эпик? А шут его знает.
😁5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Editorial_burdock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Редакция «Подтаявший лопух»” (@Editorial_burdock), 357 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Editorial_burdock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.