Channel
@Efsha_18
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,599subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004329638983 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Efsha_18 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Efsha_18 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 1,599 | -57 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 1,656 | -64 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:48 | 1,720 | -49 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 1,769 | -35 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 1,804 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 1,847 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 1,863 | +43 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 1,820 | -39 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 1,859 | -54 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 1,913 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 1,933 | +198 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 1,735 | +146 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 1,589 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 1,589 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
803 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😡 | 247 | 30.8% | |
| 😁 | 223 | 27.8% | |
| 😱 | 87 | 10.8% | |
| 🗿 | 76 | 9.46% | |
| 🤪 | 75 | 9.34% | |
| 😨 | 29 | 3.61% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 1.74% | |
| 😈 | 11 | 1.37% | |
| 🙉 | 9 | 1.12% | |
| 😘 | 8 | 0.996% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 0.872% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 0.872% | |
| 🤷 | 4 | 0.498% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 0.374% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.125% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.125% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.125% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴دیشب ریحانا، خواننده معروف اهل کالیفرنیای آمریکا🇺🇸 به همراه شوهرش "ایسپ راکی" که اونم رپر معروفیه، رفته بودن کنسرت؛ که یهو تصمیم گرفتن این صحنههای +25 سال رو وسط جمع خلق کنن🔞 + این زوج خوشبخت 3 تا بچه دارن و گویا دیشب داشتن واسه چهارمی اقدام میکردن... 💖ربات دوستیابی 🔹@Efsha_18
🗿11😡7❤🔥3😱3😈2😨1
تو یکی از کوچه پس کوچه های مملکت، یه دختر و پسر شروع کردن بوسه و مالیدن همدیگه یکی از همسایههام وقتی دید داره کار به سکس میکشه، گفت جمع کنین خونواده داره میبینه 💖ربات دوستیابی 🔹@Efsha_18
😁14🤪3😱3❤🔥1
🔴زنگ هشدار چینیها 🇨🇳 اینبار برای خانمها جدیتر شده؛ ویدیوی وایرالشده از یه ربات جنسی که چینیها بهتازگی ازش رونمایی کردن؛ این ربات بیش از 100 نوع پوزیشن رو تو حافظه خودش داره، از انواع فتیشها پشتیبانی میکنه و همچنین از چندین صدا و زبان مختلف هم پشتیبانی میکنه تا استفاده کننده خلأی تو رابطه جنسی احساس نکنه. 🔹@Efsha_18
😨14🫡7😁4❤🔥1🤷1😱1
یه #افشا ناب خیابونی 🔞 🔹@Efsha_18
😁20🗿6🤪6😱5😇1😨1
🔴درحالی که من و شما داریم هرروز اخبار جنگ و ... چک میکنیم تا ببینیم چه اتفاقی قراره سر آینده نداشتمون بیاد؛ یهسری ها تو ایران اصلا نمیدونن جنگ، مذاکره، ترامپ و ... اصلا چی هست : 🔹@Efsha_18
😡34🙉9🗿6❤🔥3😨2
صحبتهای وایرال شده از این دختر (جنده) ایرانیِ ساکن آلمان : من اونلی فنز زدم چون هیچ ایرادی توش نمیبینم، پول کسی رو هم نخوردم. تو آلمان مردم لخت میگردن و لخت همدیگررو میبینن و این یه چیز عادیه، حالا من از این راه دارم پول در میارم، مشکلش چیه؟ 🔹@Efsha_18
🗿35😁13😡7😨4
🔴قیافه بدون سانسورش هم ببینید یکم حالتون خوب بشه. 🔹@Efsha_18
😁39🤝5❤🔥3😈3😇2😎1
🔴دیشب تو یه صحنه از سریال "رویای نیمهشب" که از صداسیما پخش میشه، یه صحنهی فوق هیجانی و اکشن خلق شد که تمام کارگردانهای هالیوود رو انگشت به دهن گذاشت: 🔹@Efsha_18
🤪66😁16🗿11
⭕پرتاب سگ از کوه و حیوان آزاری توسط یه خانم که کلیپش تازه پخش شده: 🔹@Efsha_18
😡150😘8🗿4😱3😁2❤🔥1💘1🤷1
🔴شاید باورتون نشه ولی این فیلم سوپر نیست، تدریس دینیه: + هندزفری 🔞 🔹@Efsha_18
😁37🗿3🤷2😈1
🔴این آقا تو اینستاگرام📱 انقدر قشنگ ادای مهاجرانی، سخنگوی دولت رو درمیاره که همه ویدیوهاش میلیونی ویو میخورن: 🔹@Efsha_18
😁35
ویدیویی که یه خانم منتشر کرده از اینکه نشسته تو اسنپ و راننده آینه رو روی صورت خانم تنظیم کرده و باهاش جق میزنه 🔹@Efsha_18
😱72😡47😁6😈3😨2💊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Efsha_18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“افشا 18” (@Efsha_18), 1,599 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Efsha_18.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.