SALOMEYA pinned a photo

Channel
SALOMEYA
@ElenaSalomeya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,375subscribers
-157 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001765876705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ElenaSalomeya |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ElenaSalomeya |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 19,375 | -12 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:14 | 19,387 | -10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 19,397 | +3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 19,394 | -23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 19,417 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 19,416 | -19 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:14 | 19,435 | -8 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 19,443 | -16 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 19,459 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 19,457 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:45 | 19,466 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 19,472 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 19,475 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 19,480 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 19,478 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 19,477 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 19,480 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 19,481 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 19,489 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 19,493 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.2%
- avg views ÷ 19,375 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,940
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (16 June 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 29,370 |
| Reactions total | 3,251 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 57s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,512 reactions across 29 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,876 | 40.7% | |
| 😁 | 2,501 | 26.3% | |
| 🙏 | 764 | 8.03% | |
| 🔥 | 653 | 6.87% | |
| 👍 | 499 | 5.25% | |
| 🎉 | 423 | 4.45% | |
| 🤔 | 210 | 2.21% | |
| 😱 | 159 | 1.67% | |
| ✍ | 77 | 0.81% | |
| 🤝 | 75 | 0.788% | |
| 😢 | 71 | 0.746% | |
| 👏 | 62 | 0.652% | |
| 🤯 | 38 | 0.399% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 0.326% | |
| 🥴 | 25 | 0.263% | |
| 🤗 | 21 | 0.221% | |
| 🌚 | 18 | 0.189% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 0.095% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,512 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 13
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 29 we hold a reading for · 24%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ElenaSalomeya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Ой, всех школьников, а особенно их родителей соболезную поздравляю с 1 сентября 😄 #ЧП
😁321😱46🔥18🤝10❤7🙏7🎉6😢5
Подготовка к Причастию – это не вычитывание и не пост (даже 7-ми дневный), это – ожидание Таинства, внутренний настрой на приобщение Христу, размышление, проверка состояния своей души. Подготовка начинается с того момента, когда человек захотел причаститься и не заканчивается всю жизнь, а не ограничивается каким-то определенным временем когда вычитывается обязательный текст. Нельзя жить по принципу в субботу и воскр…
❤250🙏80👏21🤗2
#Новоначалка Итак, в сухом остатке в подготовке: ❗️❗️быть со всеми в мире 📚 Молитвы перед Причастием - можно разделить - можно молиться столько, сколько по силам, нет никакого смысла продолжать бормотать слова с отключенной головой - если вы были на всенощной канон уже был прочитан 🕯️ исповедь нужна обязательно только тогда, когда вы понимаете, что серьезно накосячили 🫖 евхаристический пост (в ночь перед Прич…
❤143🙏24👏13🔥3✍1
О подготовке ко Причастию Главное в подготовке ко Причастию Исповедь и Причастие Пост и Причастие Супружеское воздержание О трехдневном посте перед Причастием Причастие в осуждение Причастие и беременность Ходить на литургии и не причащаться Как причащались в древности Первые христиане были мощные, а мы немощные 🤩🤩🤩🤩 #Новоначалка@ElenaSalomeya
❤130🙏31👏12🔥4✍1
Всем доброе утро 👋🏻😌 Не забудьте помолиться ❤️
🙏196❤92🥰9
Завтра в Новоначалке соберу все, что касается подготовки ко причастию Пожалуйста, не подеритесь до завтра в комментах 😅
😁213👍74🙏51❤22🥰8👏1
Если вдруг кто-то захочет встретиться лично: 5 сентября меня можно будет выловить на фестивале От Марка | от-марка.рф 🌟 в зале Церковных Соборов храма Христа Спасителя. Тем, кто бы меня еще сто лет видеть не хотел, там тоже будет интересно. Обещают: - Концерт живой музыки - Выставку православных художников - Откровенный диалог с протоиереем Артемием Владимировым и др - Православный маркет — десятки производител…
❤116🔥40🙏20👍7😁3
#ЧП Каждый раз, когда собираюсь причаститься в незнакомом храме, а там «обязательные» 3 дня поста, 3 канона, 3 исповеди, 3 танца с бубном и тд Я:
😁305👍43❤23😢6🙏6🤝5😱3🔥2
#ПоФакту Пресвитерисса - от греч. πρεσβυτέρισσα, буквально - «старица» - это такой древний вид женского церковного служения. Его можно поставить в один ряд с другими - диакониссами и вдовицами церковными, впрочем, тоже несколько не современными понятиями. Возможно, слова апостола Павла «чтобы старицы также одевались прилично святым, не были клеветницы, не порабощались пьянству, учили добру» (Тит. 2:3) относились н…
❤159👍28✍20🙏8🤔2👏1😢1
Всем здравствуйте 👋🏻😁 Канал снова начинает свою работу) В этом учебном году каждому дню будет принадлежать определенная рубрика, а именно: Понедельник - #ПоФакту Вторник - #Новоначалка Четверг - #Вопросы Пятница - #ТекстыСП 📚Новоначалка: будем разбирать вопросы, которые чаще всего возникают в начале пути или вообще когда и пути пока на горизонте нет) 🕯️Тексты Священного Писания: будем разбирать некоторые стихи и …
❤422🎉115👍58🙏23🔥21🤗10🤝1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤283👍62🔥43🙏26🤝16🤩5🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @ElenaSalomeya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вернуться на круги своя
- Екклезиаст80%
- Псалтырь20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Выпить чашу до дна
- Ветхий Завет35%
- Новый Завет65%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Волк в овечьей шкуре
- Ветхий Завет37%
- Новый Завет63%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Глас вопиющего в пустыне
- Ветхий Завет42%
- Новый Завет58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кесарю - кесарево, Богу - Божье
- Ветхий Завет12%
- Новый Завет88%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто не работает, тот не ест
- Евангелия22%
- Апостол78%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@otecnikolay_d · 43,874
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
@beregovoymotimotivation · 21,720
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
@georghram · 33,395
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
@nickolaybabkin · 57,938
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@pravoslavieVtelege · 98,483
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
@savvamazhuko · 29,568
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@prostopostno_natalia · 53,474
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
@pravrecept · 23,297
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
@savastyanov_i · 28,348
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@ekzeget · 50,461
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@otchepro0 · 21,664
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
@otec_nikita · 24,716
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
@chto_to_li4noe · 27,885
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
@postnaya_kyhnya · 103,577
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
@igumennektariy · 25,408
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
@sergiybaranov · 30,721
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@molitva_o_semje · 22,359
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
@alinababkinatg · 22,526
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
@pavelostrovski · 231,552
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
@yanochkin_psiholog · 24,168
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
@tetiana_elfimova · 33,351
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
@azbible · 83,192
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@foma_ru_voprosy · 35,079
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@videotca_Andrea · 284,095
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SALOMEYA” (@ElenaSalomeya), 19,375 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElenaSalomeya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.