2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–8 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 14:14
7
no change
26 Aug 2026, 18:46
7
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
La femme aux multiples faces Amina la mythomane et ses frères perfides
Quand la calomniatrice rejettée "Sahra Sahra" était parti faire ses allusions de perfides sous un groupe
Amina s'est précipité pour saisir l'occasion et calomnier en anonyme
Comme vous pouvez lire sur cet échange elle tenait la face amicale en face et le dos tourné elle se mordait les doigts par haine et rage
Tout comme elle le faisait en mêm…
Ghir el khir veut dire avec quel bien viens tu ?
Lisez ce qu'ils avaient dit ces perfides calomniateurs " ne fais pas l'idiote si non tu va te faire v..."
Que Dieu abatte sur vous sa malédiction dans votre vie et apres la mort
Observez le mensonge manifeste et la falsification de cet perfide anonyme
Ils disent une femme Algérienne que j'ai menacé de violer ! fait un appel au secours en commentaire arabe
Ci joint :
https://t.me/Elhaqq_N/12
Y a pas d'entre ces traînées parmi les mâles et les femelles de 4 pattes, un seul, qui a un grain de virilité ou d'honneur
Ils parlent en anonymes et en plus que cachés derriere les écrans
Comme Dieu a décrit les impies juifs :
Ils ne vous combattent que dans dans citadelles renforcées ou de derrière des murs !
Toujours cachés car ils sont sur la fausseté et la lachèté, ils sont sans honneur et sans noms ! et ce…
La grossièreté du mensonge
Qui va imaginer qu'une personne saine et une soeur accepterait qu'un homme reste avec elle dans la maison et pire ils disent, il viole !
Quelle femme se fait violer sans deposer plainte ? Sans aller au médecin légiste !
Et encore pire ils disent " sous les yeux de ses enfants "
maudits soient les calomniateurs !
même une prostituée des trottoirs si tu lui loues un appartement elle ne va …
SAHRA LA PERFIDE TRAÎNÉE MYTHOMANE QUARANTAINAIRE RÉPUDIÉE
QUAND JE L'AI INSULTÉ PAR CE QU ELLE DIT " SE METTRE À 4 PATTES " HABITUÉE...
COMME VOUS POUVEZ VOIR SUR LA CONVERSATION EN VIDEO
ET JE LUI AI DIS QUE CEST UNE MYCHTONEUSE QUI CHERCHE UN RICHE
ELLE EST PARTIE MENTIR ET DIRE QUE
NIDAL LA HARCÈLE ! HA HA
DEPUIS QUAND NIDAL HARCELE LES CHIENNES ERRANTES SANS HONNEUR !?
EN PLUS ELLE A DEUX ENFANTS !
Si ell…
Je laisse aux perfides calomniateurs dont le caecum traine par terre de jalousie, un autre témoignage d'une étrangère que j'avais complètement oublié qui m'a appelé d'elle même le 3 août pour travailler, cest une anglophone elle parle mal le français.
que meurent la traînée calomniatrice et ses chiens batards avec elle
"فلما آسفونا انتقمنا منهم فأغرقناهم أجمعين" الزخرف ٥٥
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Elhaqq_N. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Elhaqq_N named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bint_israil named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LA VÉRITÉ” (@Elhaqq_N), 7 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elhaqq_N.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.