Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elladodelmal

Channel

Elladodelmal

@Elladodelmal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,591subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001050399065
TypeChannel
Username@Elladodelmal
CreatedBetween 1 April 2016 and 31 December 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Elladodelmal

Growth

7,5697,5937,5815 August 2026 — 7,569 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,569 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,579 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,575 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,578 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,575 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,581 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,587 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,593 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,591 subscribers7,5915 August 202631 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,565–7,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 17:077,591-2
28 Aug 2026, 06:177,593+6
25 Aug 2026, 08:247,587+6
22 Aug 2026, 14:587,581+6
19 Aug 2026, 08:437,575-3
16 Aug 2026, 08:287,578+3
12 Aug 2026, 16:147,575-4
9 Aug 2026, 16:317,579+10
6 Aug 2026, 03:067,569no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:077,569first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 7,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
882
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
29
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held47 (21 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total25,575
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC234 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://mypublicimpact.com/2026/08/28/ruben-turienzo-y-el-cambio-como-oficio/

28 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC298 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - El AIBot de la Universidad que ayuda no sólo a los estudiantes https://elladodelmal.com/2026/08/el-aibot-de-la-universidad-que-ayuda-no.html #IA #AI #ChatBot #LLM #Misalignment #LLM #Jailbreak #Hacking #Gemma

27 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC459 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - Cloudflare Connect 2026 en San Francisco: Fórmate, Certificate y Lidera la Transformación. https://www.elladodelmal.com/2026/08/cloudflare-connect-2026-en-san.html #Cloudflare #Connect #Ciberseguridad #InteligenciaArtificial #Internet #Innovación #Formación

26 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC565 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - El Smishing de la Seguridad Social y cómo protegerte Cloudflare ONE https://elladodelmal.com/2026/08/el-smishing-de-la-seguridad-social-y.html #sms #phishing #smishing #estafas #ciberestafas #Cloudflare #SeguridadSocial #TGSS

25 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC670 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - Septiembre: Media Party Barcelona, Cancún Latam CISO Summit & Barcelona AI Summit https://elladodelmal.com/2026/08/septiembre-media-party-barcelona-cancun.html #eventos #charlas #conferencias #Hacking #Ciberseguridad #IA #AI #Barcelona #Cancún #México

24 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC742 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - Tempos por Tweets: Tempos para tu Comunidad, y Tempos por apoyar perfiles en X https://www.elladodelmal.com/2026/08/tempos-por-tweets-tempos-para-tu.html #mypublicinbox #tempos #0xWord #Twitter #X

23 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC779 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - Cómo funcionan los ataques de "Enjambre" de los C2C Traders en Wallapop o Ebay https://www.elladodelmal.com/2026/08/como-funcionan-los-ataques-de-enjambre.html #curiosidades #C2C #IngenieriaSocial #Macintosh

22 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC788 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - Cómo se desmontó el algoritmo que amenazaba a la Criptografía Post Cuántica 9 días después https://www.elladodelmal.com/2026/08/como-se-desmonto-el-algoritmo-que.html #quantum #PQC #criptografia #criptoanalisis

21 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC740 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://mypublicimpact.com/2026/08/21/oscar-cavaller-y-el-oficio-de-contar-historias-en-todos-los-formatos/

21 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC723 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - El algoritmo que amenazó a la Criptografía Post-Cuántica https://www.elladodelmal.com/2026/08/el-algoritmo-que-amenazo-la.html #Quantum #PQC #Criptografía #Criptoanálisis #Cifrado #Algoritmica

20 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC840 viewsread 28 August 2026

La inteligencia artificial se ha consolidado como una de las herramientas más potentes para incrementar la eficiencia operativa, diseñar servicios digitales disruptivos y asegurar ventajas competitivas sostenibles a largo plazo. Sin embargo, las enormes expectativas depositadas por el tejido empresarial en la automatización y la toma de decisiones basada en datos suelen chocar con una realidad desalentadora, donde lo

20 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC725 viewsread 28 August 2026

El lado del mal - Guía de Seguridad de un Hacker para personas que no quieren ser Víctimas https://elladodelmal.com/2026/08/guia-de-seguridad-de-un-hacker-para.html #libro #grautito #hacker #ciberseguridad #estafas #protección

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @Elladodelmal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,497,861 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GUIAS GRATIS 📖
@guiasgratis · 103,213
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 25 August 2026
Tokin Privacy
@TokinPrivacy · 50,564
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Vacantes Remotas | Trabajos Remotos
@vacantesremotas · 128,839
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Forocoches
@forocoches_oficial · 41,882
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
Xataka
@xataka · 49,442
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elladodelmal” (@Elladodelmal), 7,591 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elladodelmal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.