Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elite Medical physics ☢️

Channel

Elite Medical physics ☢️

@Elphysics

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,201subscribers

+1,740 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668280987
TypeChannel
Username@Elphysics
Descriptionرابط غروب المناقشة 👇 https://t.me/joinchat/P33uPvEo-8NmZjc0
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Elphysics

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

13,000 average views per post against 20,201 subscribers — an engagement rate of 64.4%. Across the 5,494 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,605 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.63% and 13.9%, with a median of 7.06%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 July 2026 30 August 2026)
Posts measured49 of 51 published in the window (0 exact, 49 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled637,440
Mature posts only65.3% over 48 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers20,201 measured 29 August 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 5,494 channels · p10 0.842% · p25 2.63% · p50 7.06% · p75 13.9% · p90 24.2%
Position in cohort99.163th percentile · 9.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.146% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 30 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

18,16920,20119,1857 August 2026 — 18,461 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,492 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,685 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,816 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,887 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,946 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,011 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,066 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,328 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,169 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,239 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,309 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,360 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,485 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,052 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,315 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,663 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,803 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,991 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,085 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,201 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net +1,740. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,864–20,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 12:2420,201+116
28 Aug 2026, 12:3620,085+94
27 Aug 2026, 15:0619,991+188
26 Aug 2026, 18:2219,803+140
25 Aug 2026, 21:3419,663+348
24 Aug 2026, 20:2919,315+263
23 Aug 2026, 06:3719,052+567
21 Aug 2026, 15:0618,485+125
20 Aug 2026, 15:2718,360+51
19 Aug 2026, 12:5318,309+70
18 Aug 2026, 12:4818,239+70
17 Aug 2026, 11:5818,169-159
16 Aug 2026, 02:5818,328-738
14 Aug 2026, 15:5719,066+55
13 Aug 2026, 08:0419,011+65
12 Aug 2026, 08:2218,946+59
11 Aug 2026, 07:2418,887+71
10 Aug 2026, 04:1518,816+131
9 Aug 2026, 02:3118,685+193
8 Aug 2026, 00:2418,492first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.4%
avg views ÷ 20,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,000
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held69 (14 June 202629 August 2026)
Views total637,440
Reactions total22,269
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
768
Videos
48
Links
1,260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
24m 29s
Average length
12m 15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34,620 reactions across 67 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33,12095.7%
🤣1,5004.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,620reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC≈4,440 views158 reactionsread 29 August 2026

صباح الخير جميعاً ❤️ طلاب دمشق الأكابر 🥰❤️ جلسة دمشق غداً الأحد ان شاء الله 📌الساعة : ١٢ 📌المكان : مسرح مدينة الشباب اتستراد المزة رح حاول اجي اذا خلصت من المشفى بكير 😂❤️ نصيحة مني للطلاب الجداد اياك ثم اياك تبلش بالفترة الحالية والله ليجي الوقت الذهبي للدراسة الكل عم يدرس وانت مالل وقرفان وتعبان لانك بلشت بوقت مبالغ فيه (متل الماراثون) لك ارتااااح وريح حالك بكرا رح تتمنى يجيك يوم واحد عطلة وراحة ورح تطلب مني اعطي

158

Signed Nawwar Shaheen

27 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈11,700 views288 reactionsread 29 August 2026

يعطيكم العافية جميعاً ❤️❤️ بعد انتهاء الجلسات التعريفية حابب قول اني نحظيت فيكم وبلقائكم طلاب طرطوس وحماة وحمص بفضل العطلة يلي كانت يوم الثلاثاء قدرت انزل وشوفكم ونتعرف عبعض وأتمنى اللقاء معكم كان مثمر 😂❤️ طلاب حلب واللادقية وادلب صعبة عليي جداً كان النزلة حاولت قد ما فيني انزل وشوفكم .. بس مستحيل لأن كان عندي مقابلات بنفس يوم الجلسة 😂 فصعب عليي الموضوع جداً سامحوني انا يلي خسرت شوفتكم .. انبسطنا بالجلسات وماشاء ا

288

Signed Nawwar Shaheen

23 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC≈13,700 views377 reactionsread 29 August 2026

رحلة جديدة مع الدفعة ١٢ عوشك البدء 🚨 انت كطالب بري١٢ قدامك سنة جديدة عليك بين مواد ضخمة جديد عليها وبين معلومات صعبة وجديدة بين تجربة واماكن جديدة رفقات وزملاء جداد وجو بشكل عام جديد مطالب بالصبر ومطالب بأنك تكون واعي للشي المقبل عليه .. قدامنا مشوار طووووييييل يبدأ بالجلسات التعريفية والتعرف عليكم ومقدمات المواد وينتهي بالحلول والتسجيلات الاسعافية قبل الامتحان بيوم .. وهاد يلي عملناه مع بري١١ (السبت الماضي) ▫️ط

377

Signed Nawwar Shaheen

18 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈9,190 views80 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Pre12EPhoto

اهلنا بمحافظة إدلب #تذكير_سريع ❤️👀 بكرة موعدنا 19/8 الساعة 10 ونصف صباحاً 🫰 🔴 العنوان : ادلب_حي الجامعة_مقابل كلية الطب البشري_ضمن حديقة سيتي روز بانتظاركم .. كونوا كتار 🤩 االي ماسجل يجي في مكان إن شاء الله سجل عالجلسة 👇 @Elite112_bot

80

Signed Mohamad Dalate

15 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈22,100 views674 reactionsread 29 August 2026

بعد ما رتحتوا وصلحتوا حابب تعطوني رأيكم بالشغل يلي اشتغلناه من اول السنة لآخرها النا سنة كاملة تقريباً من وقت المقدمات بدون كلل وبدون ملل سواء بالفيزيا او الفيزيولوجيا ✅ من دعم نفسي لخطط لاتمتات لملاحظات لمكثفات لحلول اسعافية لحل اسئلة ومتابعتا مع الدكاترة اذا كان فيا اشكال ..الخ حابب خلي هالرسالة وتعليقاتا بمثابة ارشيف للدفعة القادمة 👇🏻 عذروني اذا ما عم اقدر رد عليكم كلكم تعبان كتير وعندي مقابلة عينية التلاتا

674

Signed Nawwar Shaheen

15 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈25,400 views541 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

▫️تقييم الاسئلة وشو العلامة المنيحة والممتازة اليوم ؟ وشو الاسئلة الخلافية يلي اجت ؟ وكيف رح نتعامل معا وشو النكشات يلي اجت بهالدورة وطبيعة الاسئلة والخيارات يلي اجت .. بالنهاية هاد رأيي ومنتمنى نكون عملنا يلي علينا لآخر لحظة❤️ الحمدلله الاسئلة كلا اظن من الحلول الاسعافية والاهم من ذلك انو مأكدين عليها مراراً وتكراراً وفي اسئلة هي وخياراتا بالحرف اجت من نموذج مبارح .. وسؤال دخول البيكربونات بالنبيبات الكلوية جدا

541

Signed Nawwar Shaheen

15 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈27,400 views191 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

تجميع طلابي دورة 2026 فيزيولوجيا السؤال 22 كلهن باثرو عالتخثر الا الجواب A باثر عالنزف فغالبا هنن مخربطين بدال ما يكتبوا تخثر ما عدا كاتبين نزف ما عدا https://t.me/Elphysics

191

Signed Mohamad Dalate

15 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈16,400 views757 reactionsread 29 August 2026

يعطيكم العافية الاسئلة كلمحة أولية ليست سهلة اطلاقاً وبنفس الوقت مانا تعجيزية في دقة كبيرة بطرح بعض الاسئلة وفي كم سؤال خلافي كل سنة هيك بالفيزيو الكل بيطلع مبسوط لان آخر مادة ما بحس بصعوبتا غير وقت العلامات 😂 بس لا تخاف مو صعبة جدا جدا يلي دارس ومارر عكل المعلومات بصراحة بجيب +٩٠ بس شوفا بشكل كامل منحكم عليها .. وبحاول نزل الحل بأسرع ما يمكن ارتاحوا حالياً ولا تنقوا 👍🏻✅ ومبروك انتهاءكم من السنة التحضيرية وشكرا

757

Signed Nawwar Shaheen

15 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈15,300 views478 reactionsread 29 August 2026

الف مبروك الخلاص من السنة التحضيرية كاملةً ❤️🔥 طنوني كيف مستوى الاسئلة يا وحوش ❤️❤️ الي متذكر اسئلة يبعت عالبوت👇 @Elitephysics11_bot

478

Signed Mohamad Dalate

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @Elphysics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTCAnonymous Poll5,070 voters approx.

وين وصلتو بالمراجعة يا اكابر ؟

  1. التاني14%
  2. الخامس9%
  3. السادس12%
  4. التامن16%
  5. السابع25%
  6. التالت11%
  7. متفرج13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,864 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

وزارة التعليم العالي والبحث العلمي السورية
@SyMOHEASR · 148,026
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elite Medical physics ☢️” (@Elphysics), 20,201 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elphysics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.